Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-03-31
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Standardized Nutrient Management on Clinical Outcomes of Hematopoientic Stem Cell Transportation Patients
NCT04591340
Intratumoral Cancer Chemotherapy Through a Flexible Bronchoscope as an Adjunct to Brachytherapy
NCT00379665
Pharmacogenomic Testing to Personalize Supportive Oncology
NCT04500301
A Pilot, Feasibility Study of Intermittent Caloric Restriction Plus Plant-based Diet in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
NCT05359848
A Study of Tesetaxel Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Solid Tumors
NCT01315431
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women who are pregnant, or could become pregnant, may not participate in the study.
* Patients 18 years of age or older
* Patients have to be able and willing to complete the various QoL instruments, which will be given upon enrollment and at designated follow-up intervals.
* Patients must have either had the benefits of standard, appropriate therapy and have had that fail, or refuse to receive these therapies after having been informed of the standard of care for their particular stage and diagnosis. This criteria is included for ethical, not clinical reasons.
* In addition, other criteria may be developed that more specifically address: The type, stage, location of the cancer/metastasis. The length of time since diagnosis. Previous treatments attempted and their outcome, Length of time since last treatment and concurrent conventional treatments. Nutritional approaches, other cam treatments, factors that may confound the study results.
* Ability, commitment of patient to follow IPTLD protocol
* Best Answer for Cancer Foundation and Kotsanis Institute do intend to draw subjects only from within the pool of patients who have elected to undergo IPTLD and nutrition therapy as their treatment of choice; limiting the universe of subjects to IPTLD patients removes the confounding effects of patient treatment choice and possible consideration of other treatment arms from the design.
* The focus is simple: it is to follow IPTLD patients and determine longitudinal impacts of treatment on quality of life experienced by IPTLD patients as a treatment group.
* It is to allow comparison with well-documented QoL results from conventional chemotherapy. This is the original intent, and recruitment efforts for participants will remain within those who are IPTLD patients.
* The initial, baseline QoL testing of IPTLD patients who choose to be in the study will include some questions designed to elicit the reasons the patient decided on IPTLD and nutrition therapy. Documenting these choices can serve two purposes; correlations between reasons, and the attitudes they reveal about factors known to impact QoL, such a positive sense of controlling one's health choices, can be drawn. Further, once these factors are accounted for, some inferences about the extent to which IPTLD and nutrition therapy are responsible for impacts on QoL can be derived.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Best Answer for Cancer Foundation
OTHER
Constantine A. Kotsanis
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Constantine A. Kotsanis
Principle Investigator, M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Constantine A. Kotsanis, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Kotsanis Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Kotsanis Institute
Grapevine, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10.03.0010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.