Peak Impact Forces and Metabolic Cost During Mid-Forefoot Striking in Shod Versus Barefoot Runners

NCT ID: NCT01536171

Last Updated: 2014-04-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This experimental study will compare impact forces and metabolic cost in runners (N=20; ages 18-45 years, who already use a forefoot strike running gait) in two treadmill running test sessions (shod vs barefoot running)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aim 1: To identify if differences in metabolic cost exist between barefoot versus cushioned shod FM strikers during an acute bout of running exercise. Hypothesis: The metabolic cost will be higher in the cushioned shod runners with forefoot and midfoot strike compared to the barefoot runners.

Specific Aim 2: To identify if differences in peak impact forces exist between barefoot versus cushioned shod runners in forefoot-midfoot (FM) strikers.

Hypothesis: Peak impact forces will be higher in the barefoot runners with a forefoot and midfoot striking running style compared to the cushioned shod runners with a forefoot and midfoot striking running style.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shod versus Barefoot Running

two running conditions, with normal running shoes and barefoot

running with normal running shoes and barefoot

Intervention Type OTHER

shod condition: normal running shoes barefoot condition: running with no shoewear

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

running with normal running shoes and barefoot

shod condition: normal running shoes barefoot condition: running with no shoewear

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* trained runners with a running foot striking style of either initial forefoot or midfoot strike.
* run on average at least 20 miles/week
* be able to run for at least 20 minutes at one session
* free of any orthopedic limitation

Exclusion Criteria

* history of lower extremity injury within the last 6 months prior to testing
* rear-foot strike running style
* does not run in a cushioned shoe on any occasion
* runs on average \< 20 miles/week
* unable to run for 20 minutes or greater
* presence of any open wound or deformity on the feet which would prevent participant from running barefoot
* neurologic injury that would preclude normal running activity.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heather K Vincent, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UF&Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

497-2010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Effect of Insoles in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT06563492 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Footwear Minimalism Study
NCT01334346 COMPLETED PHASE2