A Prospective Study Evaluating The Utility of Transnasal Endoscopy With Roux en Y Gastric Bypass
NCT ID: NCT01526772
Last Updated: 2017-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
11 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-09-30
2014-07-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
EGD in post bariatric patients is a safe procedure. However it typically requires deep sedation administered by an anesthesiologist to overcome the patient's gag reflex and discomfort. Sedation in obese patients can be challenging due to the risks of apnea and challenges of tracheal intubation. For the procedure to be performed the patient must take the day off from work and bring a driver to take them home, thus there are significant direct and indirect costs to the procedure.
Improvements in imaging technology have allowed for the development of small endoscopes ("slim scopes") half the size of a typical endoscope. These small endoscopes can be passed transnasally into the esophagus and stomach with only local anesthesia to the nasal passage without the need for deep sedation. They have been used in the detection of diseases of the esophagus and stomach,3,4 but have not been used in the detection of complications in the post bariatric population
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients who have undergone RYGB
Patients who have undergone RYGB and have been referred for an EGD
Endoscopy
Transoral endoscopy versus transoral endoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopy
Transoral endoscopy versus transoral endoscopy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects have undergone Roux en Y gastric bypass
* Subjects report any of the following symptoms that would prompt investigation and referral for an upper endoscopy; abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting or problems swallowing
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John O Evans, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Baptist Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00018487
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id