Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Double Blind Study Comparing Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid and Placebo During Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Dysfunction (NCT NCT01524913)

NCT ID: NCT01524913

Last Updated: 2017-05-05

Results Overview

The change in pain level was assessed using a single-item visual analogue pain scale at Baseline (preoperatively) and at Month 1. Participants indicate their level on pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The right and left side of each participant's jaw was evaluated separately. The change in pain score was obtained by subtracting the Month 1 score from the Baseline score and a negative value indicates a reduction in pain level.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

102 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (preoperation), Month 1

Results posted on

2017-05-05

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from patients referred to the oral and maxillary surgery services at Emory University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of California - Los Angeles, the University of Cincinnati, and the Oregon Health Science University. All patients were referred for management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain.

A total of 105 patients were screened; three did not meet inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 102 participants who were randomized and began the study treatment.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Corticosteroid
Participants in this group received 1 milliliter (mL) of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
Participants in the group received 1milliliter (mL) of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
Participants in this group received 1 milliliter (mL) of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Overall Study
STARTED
35
36
31
Overall Study
COMPLETED
31
36
31
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Corticosteroid
Participants in this group received 1 milliliter (mL) of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
Participants in the group received 1milliliter (mL) of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
Participants in this group received 1 milliliter (mL) of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Double Blind Study Comparing Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid and Placebo During Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Dysfunction

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Corticosteroid
n=35 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
n=36 Participants
Participants in the group received 1mL of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Total
n=102 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4 • n=5 Participants
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=7 Participants
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=5 Participants
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
76 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants
n=5 Participants
36 participants
n=7 Participants
31 participants
n=5 Participants
102 participants
n=4 Participants
Headache
Yes
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=4 Participants
Headache
No
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=4 Participants
Migraine
Yes
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
Migraine
No
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
74 Participants
n=4 Participants
Prior TMJ Surgery
Yes
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
Prior TMJ Surgery
No
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
92 Participants
n=4 Participants
Capsular Pain
Yes
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
78 Participants
n=4 Participants
Capsular Pain
No
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
Myofascial Pain
Yes
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
Myofascial Pain
No
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
Cervical Pain
Yes
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
33 Participants
n=4 Participants
Cervical Pain
No
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
69 Participants
n=4 Participants
Clicking Jaw
Yes
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
Clicking Jaw
No
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
65 Participants
n=4 Participants
Crepitus
Yes
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
Crepitus
No
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (preoperation), Month 1

Population: The population at this time point consists of study participants who received their assigned intervention and were not lost to follow up by the Month 1 assessment.

The change in pain level was assessed using a single-item visual analogue pain scale at Baseline (preoperatively) and at Month 1. Participants indicate their level on pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The right and left side of each participant's jaw was evaluated separately. The change in pain score was obtained by subtracting the Month 1 score from the Baseline score and a negative value indicates a reduction in pain level.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Corticosteroid
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
n=36 Participants
Participants in the group received 1mL of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Change in Pain Between Baseline and Month 1 Scores
Change in Pain - Left Side
-2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
-2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
-2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
Change in Pain Between Baseline and Month 1 Scores
Change in Pain - Right Side
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
-1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
-2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (preoperation), Month 1, Month 3

Population: The population for MIO analysis consists of participants having a measurement at each specified time point. The decline in the number of participants over time is due to participants who were lost to follow-up as the study progressed and one participant who attended the Month 3 visit but did not provide data for the MIO assessment.

Range of motion was assessed at Baseline (preoperatively) and again at Months 1 and 3 using a millimeter ruler for maximum incisal opening. MIO was measurements were taken for maximum opening without and with pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Corticosteroid
n=35 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
n=36 Participants
Participants in the group received 1mL of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Baseline MIO maximum
37.0 millimeters
Standard Deviation 8.5
33.9 millimeters
Standard Deviation 10.3
34.1 millimeters
Standard Deviation 7.8
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Month 1 MIO without pain
35.0 millimeters
Standard Deviation 9.4
31.7 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.4
29.6 millimeters
Standard Deviation 10.6
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Month 3 MIO maximum
37.8 millimeters
Standard Deviation 15.0
38.3 millimeters
Standard Deviation 13.2
39.3 millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.3
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Baseline MIO without pain
28.3 millimeters
Standard Deviation 8.4
27.9 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.2
25.7 millimeters
Standard Deviation 7.5
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Month 1 MIO maximum
39.0 millimeters
Standard Deviation 10.5
36.8 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.2
37.4 millimeters
Standard Deviation 6.7
Change in Maximum Incisal Opening (MIO) Between Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3
Month 3 MIO without pain
36.1 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.3
33.9 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.7
35.7 millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 1

Population: The population at this time point consists of study participants who received the intervention they were randomized to and were not lost to follow-up before the Month 1 visit.

The Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) is an 8 item survey where respondents indicate the presence or absence of problems with chewing, drinking, eating hard food, eating soft food, smiling or laughing, yawning, swallowing, and talking. Responses of "no" are scored as "0" and responses of "yes" are scored as "1". The total score categorizes jaw limitation as: none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-8).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Corticosteroid
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
n=36 Participants
Participants in the group received 1mL of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
None
3 Participants
5 Participants
6 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Mild
18 Participants
14 Participants
14 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Moderate
9 Participants
14 Participants
9 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Severe
1 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 3

Population: The population at this time point consists of study participants who received the intervention they were randomized to, were not lost to follow-up before the Month 3 visit, and completed assessments at the Month 3 visit (one participant did not provide JFLS data at the Month 3 time point).

The Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) is an 8 item survey where respondents indicate the presence or absence of problems with chewing, drinking, eating hard food, eating soft food, smiling or laughing, yawning, swallowing, and talking. Responses of "no" are scored as "0" and responses of "yes" are scored as "1". The total score categorizes jaw limitation as: none (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-8).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Corticosteroid
n=19 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of Celestone (6mg/mL) injected into the the superior joint space.
Hyaluronic Acid
n=17 Participants
Participants in the group received 1mL of Hyalgan (10 mg/mL) injected into the superior joint space.
Saline Placebo
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received 1mL of lactated Ringer's solution injected into the superior joint space.
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Moderate
5 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
None
5 Participants
5 Participants
6 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Mild
8 Participants
7 Participants
5 Participants
Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) Score
Severe
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Corticosteroid

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Hyaluronic Acid

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Saline Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Gary Bouloux, MD, DDS

Emory University

Phone: 404-778-4500

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place