Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO) (NCT NCT01521559)
NCT ID: NCT01521559
Last Updated: 2014-11-13
Results Overview
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
183 participants
Baseline to week 24
2014-11-13
Participant Flow
Participants with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) involving the center of the macula in the study eye were eligible to participate in the study.
Of 281 participants who were screened for inclusion in the study, 183 were enrolled (started) and 183 received treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants received treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Participants received 2 milligrams (mg) Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group could receive laser rescue at week 36.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
92
|
91
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Week 24
|
83
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Week 52
|
77
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
77
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
18
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants received treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Participants received 2 milligrams (mg) Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group could receive laser rescue at week 36.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
9
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=90 Participants
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants received treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 Participants
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group could receive laser rescue at week 36.
|
Total
n=181 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.37 • n=5 Participants
|
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=7 Participants
|
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24Population: FAS
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=90 Participants
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 Participants
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 - LOCF
|
24 participants
|
48 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24Population: FAS
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24 - Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=90 Participants
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 Participants
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in BCVA Score - LOCF
|
6.9 letters correctly read
Standard Deviation 12.91
|
17.0 letters correctly read
Standard Deviation 11.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24Population: FAS
CRT was evaluated at every visit from baseline through week 24 using spectral domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=90 Participants
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 Participants
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF
|
-128.0 microns
Standard Deviation 195.02
|
-280.5 microns
Standard Deviation 189.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24Population: FAS
The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales that are all scored from 0-100. Near activities are defined as reading ordinary print in newspapers, performing work or hobbies requiring near vision, or finding something on a crowded shelf.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=87 Participants
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=88 Participants
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF
|
6.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
7.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.08
|
Adverse Events
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=92 participants at risk
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants received treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 participants at risk
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group could receive laser rescue at week 36.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
2.2%
2/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cataract traumatic
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Cervical spinal stenosis
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
2.2%
2/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
General disorders
Hernia
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal fistula
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
2.2%
2/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
0.00%
0/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
1.1%
1/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)
n=92 participants at risk
Participants received macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants received treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.
|
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
n=91 participants at risk
Participants received 2 mg Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group could receive laser rescue at week 36.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
5.4%
5/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
4.4%
4/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.2%
2/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
6.6%
6/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
15.2%
14/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
24.2%
22/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
1.1%
1/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
7.7%
7/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
7.6%
7/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
5.5%
5/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
16.3%
15/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
9.9%
9/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.7%
8/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
8.8%
8/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
7.6%
7/92 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
3.3%
3/91 • Through Week 52 (end of study)
The safety analysis set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received any investigational product; it is based on the treatment received (as treated).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Without the prior written agreement of the Sponsor, the Institution (I) shall not publish, submit or present for publication, directly or indirectly, any Manuscript (M) prior to publication of an article in a peer-reviewed scientific journal summarizing data generated by all Study centers, unless no such article is so published before the first anniversary of the finalization of the clinical study report, in which case the (I) may publish or submit for publication a (M) without further delay.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER