Trial Outcomes & Findings for Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain (NCT NCT01515540)
NCT ID: NCT01515540
Last Updated: 2013-07-30
Results Overview
the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
38 participants
2 weeks
2013-07-30
Participant Flow
38 patients were recruited for the brain imaging and treatment study. Data from 7 subjects was not analyzed due to failure to attend the repeat sessions for non specific reasons and data from 1 subject was excluded from analysis due to technical faults. Thus, data from a total of 30 subjects was included in the brain imaging analysis.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lidocaine
5% lidoderm patch
|
Control
placebo patch
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Brain Imaging of Lidoderm for Chronic Back Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lidocaine
n=20 Participants
5% lidoderm patch
|
Control
n=18 Participants
placebo patch
|
Total
n=38 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=5 Participants
|
49.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.27 • n=7 Participants
|
51.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksPopulation: based on a literature search.
the primary hypothesis was that the lidoderm 5% patch was expected to decrease pain intensity post treatment greater than placebo patch. A lower value on the 0-100 scale is considered to represent less pain. Higher values represent more pain. Greater than 20%-30% decrease in pain is considered clinically meaningful.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lidocaine
n=15 Participants
5% lidoderm patch
|
Control
n=15 Participants
placebo patch
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) The Scale Had Values From 0-100, Where 0 Represents "no Pain" and 100 Was the "Worst Pain Imaginable".
|
51.0 peak pain intensity
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
51.6 peak pain intensity
Standard Deviation 7.1
|
Adverse Events
Lidocaine
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place