Hyperopia Treatment Study 1 (HTS1) - Glasses vs Observation

NCT ID: NCT01515475

Last Updated: 2019-07-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

249 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-23

Study Completion Date

2018-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare visual acuity outcomes and development of strabismus after a 3-year follow-up period in children age 12 to \<72 months with moderate hyperopia (spherical equivalent +3.00D to +6.00D) who are prescribed glasses either immediately or only after confirmation of pre-specified deterioration criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Moderate and high hyperopia are associated with the development of strabismus and amblyopia. The primary aims of treatment for asymptomatic moderate and high hyperopia in preschool children are to facilitate the development of normal visual acuity and to prevent the development of esotropia and amblyopia. Treatment consists of optical correction, typically using glasses. For children with high hyperopia (\>+5.00D) and without strabismus or amblyopia, there is general consensus that a correction should be prescribed. Nevertheless, for children with moderate hyperopia (+3.00D to +5.00D) without strabismus or amblyopia, there is less consensus among pediatric eye care professionals. A survey by Lyons et al found that for a 2-year-old child with hyperopia greater than +3.00D, 65% of optometrists would prescribe glasses compared to 25% of ophthalmologists; for a 4-year old with hyperopia greater than +3.00D, 67% of optometrists would prescribe compared with 42% of ophthalmologists. The American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) recommends correcting +4.00D or more in 2 to 7 year olds and the American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends a threshold of +4.50D for correction in 2-to 3-year olds. Unlike ophthalmology, optometry does not provide specific recommendations based on age and level of refractive error. Such variation in practice highlights the lack of rigorously collected scientific evidence for the management of this condition. Across all levels of hyperopia, most ophthalmologists and optometrists usually prescribe less than the full cycloplegic refraction (71% in the Lyons survey) when no strabismus or amblyopia is present.

The rationale for proactively correcting moderate hyperopia in an asymptomatic child is the prevention of esotropia, amblyopia, or asthenopia. The argument against correcting moderate hyperopia in an asymptomatic child is the expense and inconvenience of glasses that might be unnecessary and the potential disruption of emmetropization in infants and toddlers. At present, it remains uncertain whether correction of moderate hyperopia is beneficial in terms of visual acuity outcomes or strabismus development. There is some evidence that using partial correction of hyperopia allows emmetropization to take place.

If refractive correction of moderate hyperopia does not reduce the incidence of amblyopia and/or esotropia compared to no refractive correction, then glasses can be avoided. However, if correcting moderate hyperopia does reduce the development of amblyopia and/or esotropia, then the benefits of preemptive refractive correction will have been identified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Glasses

Glasses are prescribed at enrollment and worn per protocol throughout the duration of the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glasses

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.

Observation

Glasses will not be prescribed unless the patient has confirmation of one or more deterioration criteria as described in the protocol.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Glasses

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Glasses

Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 12 to \< 72 months
2. Refractive error between +3.00D and +6.00D SE (by cycloplegic refraction) in either eye
3. Astigmatism \< 1.50D in both eyes
4. Spherical equivalent anisometropia ≤ +1.50D
5. For children 36 to \<72 months of age:

1. No evidence of subnormal visual acuity - Uncorrected monocular visual acuity in both eyes of 20/50 or better for age 36 to \<48 months,20/40 or better for age 48 to \<60 months, and 20/32 or better for ages 60 to \<72 months measured without cycloplegia using the ATS-HOTV© visual acuity testing protocol
2. Zero (0) or 1 logMAR line interocular difference (IOD) in uncorrected visual acuity measured without cycloplegia using the ATS-HOTV© visual acuity testing protocol
3. Age-normal stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Stereotest (see Table 2 of protocol)
6. Gestational age \>32 weeks
7. Investigator is willing to prescribe glasses per protocol or observe the hyperopia untreated for 3 years unless specific criteria for deterioration outlined in section 3.3.3 are confirmed.
8. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization to either glasses or no glasses initially, and is willing to wear glasses as prescribed or accept that glasses will not be prescribed by the investigator unless specific deterioration criteria outlined in section 3.3.3 are confirmed.
9. Parent has phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff.
10. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study within the next 36 months is not anticipated.

Exclusion Criteria

A patient is excluded for any of the following reasons:

1. Any measurable heterotropia at distance (3 meters) or at near (1/3 meter) by cover/uncover testing. Note that patients with heterophoria are eligible.
2. Previous documented strabismus (parental report must be confirmed by investigator)
3. Manifest or latent nystagmus evident clinically
4. Previous treatment of refractive error with glasses or contacts unless duration of glasses or contacts wear was one week or less and occurred more than 2 months prior to enrollment.
5. Previous intraocular, refractive, or extraocular muscle surgery
6. Previous amblyopia treatment
7. Previous vergence/accommodative therapy
8. Parental concerns over learning or development
9. Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce visual acuity
10. Symptoms of blur or asthenopia
11. Developmental delay diagnosed by pediatrician or Individualized Education Program (IEP)
12. Known neurological anomalies (e.g. cerebral palsy, Down syndrome)
13. Inability to perform visual acuity ATS-HOTV testing if ≥ 36 months of age
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

71 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jaeb Center for Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marjean Kulp, OD, MS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Jaeb Center for Health Research

David Petersen, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Jaeb Center for Health Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University College of Optometry

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Eye Care Associates

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Clinical factors associated with moderate hyperopia in preschool children with normal stereopsis and visual acuity. J AAPOS. 2016 Oct;20(5):455-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27663627 (View on PubMed)

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Kulp MT, Holmes JM, Dean TW, Suh DW, Kraker RT, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Cotter SA, Manny RE, Superstein R, Roberts TL, Avallone JM, Fishman DR, Erzurum SA, Leske DA, Christoff A. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in 1- and 2-Year-Olds. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.049. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30615896 (View on PubMed)

Holmes JM, Kulp MT, Dean TW, Suh DW, Kraker RT, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Lorenzana IJ, Ticho BH, Verderber LC, Weise KK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in Children 3 to 5 Years of Age. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:145-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31255587 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2U10EY011751

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

HTS1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Control of Myopia Using Novel Spectacle Lens Designs
NCT03623074 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA