Hyperopia Treatment Study 1 (HTS1) - Glasses vs Observation
NCT ID: NCT01515475
Last Updated: 2019-07-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
249 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-23
2018-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhancement of Emmetropization in Hyperopic Infants
NCT00574717
Bifocal Spectacles vs. Single Vision Spectacles for Esotropia Greater at Near
NCT05527015
Characterization of the Central and Peripheral Wavefront Aberration Profile in Pediatric Myopic Subjects
NCT06075576
Correction of Farsightedness in Children Study
NCT00472212
Effect of Light-Blocking Lenses on Pediatric Hyperopia
NCT07142915
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The rationale for proactively correcting moderate hyperopia in an asymptomatic child is the prevention of esotropia, amblyopia, or asthenopia. The argument against correcting moderate hyperopia in an asymptomatic child is the expense and inconvenience of glasses that might be unnecessary and the potential disruption of emmetropization in infants and toddlers. At present, it remains uncertain whether correction of moderate hyperopia is beneficial in terms of visual acuity outcomes or strabismus development. There is some evidence that using partial correction of hyperopia allows emmetropization to take place.
If refractive correction of moderate hyperopia does not reduce the incidence of amblyopia and/or esotropia compared to no refractive correction, then glasses can be avoided. However, if correcting moderate hyperopia does reduce the development of amblyopia and/or esotropia, then the benefits of preemptive refractive correction will have been identified.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Glasses
Glasses are prescribed at enrollment and worn per protocol throughout the duration of the study.
Glasses
Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.
Observation
Glasses will not be prescribed unless the patient has confirmation of one or more deterioration criteria as described in the protocol.
Glasses
Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Glasses
Glasses will be prescribed at enrollment with the sphere cut symmetrically by 1.00D and full cylinder correction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Refractive error between +3.00D and +6.00D SE (by cycloplegic refraction) in either eye
3. Astigmatism \< 1.50D in both eyes
4. Spherical equivalent anisometropia ≤ +1.50D
5. For children 36 to \<72 months of age:
1. No evidence of subnormal visual acuity - Uncorrected monocular visual acuity in both eyes of 20/50 or better for age 36 to \<48 months,20/40 or better for age 48 to \<60 months, and 20/32 or better for ages 60 to \<72 months measured without cycloplegia using the ATS-HOTV© visual acuity testing protocol
2. Zero (0) or 1 logMAR line interocular difference (IOD) in uncorrected visual acuity measured without cycloplegia using the ATS-HOTV© visual acuity testing protocol
3. Age-normal stereoacuity on the Randot Preschool Stereotest (see Table 2 of protocol)
6. Gestational age \>32 weeks
7. Investigator is willing to prescribe glasses per protocol or observe the hyperopia untreated for 3 years unless specific criteria for deterioration outlined in section 3.3.3 are confirmed.
8. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization to either glasses or no glasses initially, and is willing to wear glasses as prescribed or accept that glasses will not be prescribed by the investigator unless specific deterioration criteria outlined in section 3.3.3 are confirmed.
9. Parent has phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff.
10. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study within the next 36 months is not anticipated.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Any measurable heterotropia at distance (3 meters) or at near (1/3 meter) by cover/uncover testing. Note that patients with heterophoria are eligible.
2. Previous documented strabismus (parental report must be confirmed by investigator)
3. Manifest or latent nystagmus evident clinically
4. Previous treatment of refractive error with glasses or contacts unless duration of glasses or contacts wear was one week or less and occurred more than 2 months prior to enrollment.
5. Previous intraocular, refractive, or extraocular muscle surgery
6. Previous amblyopia treatment
7. Previous vergence/accommodative therapy
8. Parental concerns over learning or development
9. Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce visual acuity
10. Symptoms of blur or asthenopia
11. Developmental delay diagnosed by pediatrician or Individualized Education Program (IEP)
12. Known neurological anomalies (e.g. cerebral palsy, Down syndrome)
13. Inability to perform visual acuity ATS-HOTV testing if ≥ 36 months of age
12 Months
71 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
NETWORK
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marjean Kulp, OD, MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Jaeb Center for Health Research
David Petersen, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ohio State University College of Optometry
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Rocky Mountain Eye Care Associates
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Clinical factors associated with moderate hyperopia in preschool children with normal stereopsis and visual acuity. J AAPOS. 2016 Oct;20(5):455-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Kulp MT, Holmes JM, Dean TW, Suh DW, Kraker RT, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Cotter SA, Manny RE, Superstein R, Roberts TL, Avallone JM, Fishman DR, Erzurum SA, Leske DA, Christoff A. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in 1- and 2-Year-Olds. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):876-887. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.049. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Holmes JM, Kulp MT, Dean TW, Suh DW, Kraker RT, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Lorenzana IJ, Ticho BH, Verderber LC, Weise KK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in Children 3 to 5 Years of Age. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:145-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HTS1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.