Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of LCQ908 in Subjects With Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (NCT NCT01514461)

NCT ID: NCT01514461

Last Updated: 2015-06-03

Results Overview

Blood samples were collected for a fasting lipid panel, including triglycerides. If the 12-week value was missing, the measurement value at 12 weeks or the last available post-baseline measurement value during the double-blind treatment period was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the average of fasting triglyceride values taken at day -3 and day 1. Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressing as a percentage change from baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

45 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to 12 weeks

Results posted on

2015-06-03

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Overall Study
STARTED
15
15
15
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
12
11
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
3
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
1
3
Overall Study
Physician Decision
1
1
0
Overall Study
Patient/guardian decision
1
1
1
Overall Study
Death
1
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of LCQ908 in Subjects With Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Total
n=45 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61 • n=7 Participants
42.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94 • n=5 Participants
45.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63 • n=4 Participants
Age, Customized
< 65 years
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized. The number of randomized patients with non-missing fasting triglycerides values at baseline and Week 12 are included in this analysis.

Blood samples were collected for a fasting lipid panel, including triglycerides. If the 12-week value was missing, the measurement value at 12 weeks or the last available post-baseline measurement value during the double-blind treatment period was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the average of fasting triglyceride values taken at day -3 and day 1. Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressing as a percentage change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides From Baseline to 12 Weeks
45.6 percent change
Interval 6.8 to 98.7
3.7 percent change
Interval -24.3 to 42.1
-13.9 percent change
Interval -38.9 to 21.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.

Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
14.3 Percentage of participants
21.4 Percentage of participants
50.0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
30.8 Percentage of participants
35.7 Percentage of participants
33.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
18.2 Percentage of participants
21.4 Percentage of participants
27.3 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.

Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
14.3 Percentage of participants
14.3 Percentage of participants
33.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
30.8 Percentage of participants
14.3 Percentage of participants
16.7 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
18.2 Percentage of participants
14.3 Percentage of participants
18.2 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.

Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
0.0 Percentage of participants
14.3 Percentage of participants
25.0 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
15.4 Percentage of participants
28.6 Percentage of participants
16.7 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
0.0 Percentage of participants
14.3 Percentage of participants
27.3 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.

Percentage of patients reaching target values of \<1000 mg/dL or target values of \< 2000 mg/dL for fasting triglycerides is reported. Pecentage calculated as (m/n)\*100; where 'm' The number of patients who reach target values for fasting triglyceride, 'n' the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 12 (n=14,14,12)
14.3 Percentage of patients
21.4 Percentage of patients
33.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 24 (n=13,14,12)
30.8 Percentage of patients
21.4 Percentage of patients
25.0 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 52 (n=11,14,11)
27.3 Percentage of patients
14.3 Percentage of patients
36.4 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 12 (n=14,14,12)
35.7 Percentage of patients
50.0 Percentage of patients
83.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 24 (n=13,14,12)
38.5 Percentage of patients
57.1 Percentage of patients
58.3 Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 52 (n=11,14,11)
36.4 Percentage of patients
50.0 Percentage of patients
63.6 Percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides
Week 24 (n=13, 14, 12)
4.9 Percent change
Interval -26.6 to 50.1
-15.8 Percent change
Interval -40.5 to 19.3
5.5 Percent change
Interval -28.0 to 54.5
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides
Week 52 (n=11, 14, 11)
15.2 Percent change
Interval -23.0 to 72.5
-6.7 Percent change
Interval -36.4 to 36.9
4.9 Percent change
Interval -31.2 to 60.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-24 hours at Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized. For each category, the number of randomized patients who have non-missing values are included in this analysis.

Post prandial peak triglycerides - maximum triglyceride value over 0-24 hours Post prandial triglycerides AUC0-24 - area under the time curve for triglycerides over 0-24 Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressed as a percentage change from baseline. hours

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Percent Change From Baseline for Postprandial Triglycerides Following the Standardized Meal Tolerance Test at Week 12
Triglycerides (Peak 0-24h) [n=12, 12, 11)
56.9 Percent change
Interval 6.9 to 130.2
8.6 Percent change
Interval -24.8 to 56.8
6.3 Percent change
Interval -30.3 to 62.2
Percent Change From Baseline for Postprandial Triglycerides Following the Standardized Meal Tolerance Test at Week 12
Triglycerides (AUC 0-24h) [n=12, 12, 11)
44.5 Percent change
Interval -1.3 to 111.5
0.8 Percent change
Interval -30.1 to 45.1
2.8 Percent change
Interval -32.4 to 56.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12

Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment

Lowest observed blood concentration (Cmin) and observed maximum blood concentration (Cmax) following drug administration derived from non-compartmental analysis using scheduled sampling time for the whole dataset.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908 - Trough Concentration (Cmin) and Observed Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax)
Cmin
312 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 120
426 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 224
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908 - Trough Concentration (Cmin) and Observed Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax)
Cmax
603 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 244
745 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 408

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12

Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment

The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours after drug administration was calculated by using linear trapezoidal rule.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve AUC (0-24hour)
11000 ng/mL *hr
Standard Deviation 4100
14300 ng/mL *hr
Standard Deviation 7390

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12

Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Time to Reach Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration Tmax (Hours)
6 hours
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
8 hours
Interval 0.0 to 24.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12

Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Average observed blood concentration measured by (AUC0-24)/24.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Average Observed Blood Concentration (Cavg)
459 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 171
597 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 308

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 52 weeks

Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
At least one adverse events
15 Participants
15 Participants
14 Participants
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
At least one serious adverse event
6 Participants
6 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
Death
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

LCQ908 20 mg

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

LCQ908 40 mg

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen will follow. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet will be followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ARREST
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDER
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS ACUTE
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HYPERTRANSAMINASAEMIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
INCISIONAL HERNIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MALIGNANT PALATE NEOPLASM
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
FEMORAL ARTERY OCCLUSION
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen will follow. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet will be followed and recorded in patient diary.
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LEUKOPENIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
THROMBOCYTOPENIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ARREST
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
PALPITATIONS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
SUPRAVENTRICULAR EXTRASYSTOLES
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
DEAFNESS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
BLEPHARITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
CONJUNCTIVAL HAEMORRHAGE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL DISTENSION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
46.7%
7/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL RIGIDITY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
BARRETT'S OESOPHAGUS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CHANGE OF BOWEL HABIT
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DEFAECATION URGENCY
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DENTAL CARIES
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
66.7%
10/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
80.0%
12/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
71.4%
10/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIVERTICULUM
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DRY MOUTH
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPEPSIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ENTERITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FAECES DISCOLOURED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FAECES SOFT
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FLATULENCE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FREQUENT BOWEL MOVEMENTS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
HYPERCHLORHYDRIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
INGUINAL HERNIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
33.3%
5/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
RECTAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
TOOTHACHE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
40.0%
6/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
CYST
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
FATIGUE
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
MALAISE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
PYREXIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLELITHIASIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
ALLERGY TO ARTHROPOD STING
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
ALLERGY TO PLANTS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
FOOD ALLERGY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
CONJUNCTIVITIS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
CYSTITIS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
EAR INFECTION
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
ERYSIPELAS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS VIRAL
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
HAND-FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
HORDEOLUM
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
JOINT ABSCESS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
LARYNGITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
LOCALISED INFECTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PHARYNGITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
RHINITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
SUBCUTANEOUS ABSCESS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
TINEA INFECTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
TOOTH ABSCESS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
TOOTH INFECTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
CHEST INJURY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
CONTUSION
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIGAMENT SPRAIN
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIMB INJURY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MUSCLE RUPTURE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
POST PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
RIB FRACTURE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SCAR
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPORTS INJURY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
TOOTH FRACTURE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
BLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
CAROTID BRUIT
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
HAEMOGLOBIN DECREASED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
WEIGHT INCREASED
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DIABETES MELLITUS
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOCALCAEMIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOGLYCAEMIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
IRON DEFICIENCY
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
21.4%
3/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BURSITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCLE FATIGUE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCLE SPASMS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYOPATHY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
NECK PAIN
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SJOGREN'S SYNDROME
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
TENDONITIS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
LIPOMA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NEOPLASM SKIN
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
PAPILLOMA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
DYSGEUSIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
26.7%
4/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
LETHARGY
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
SCIATICA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
STRESS
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
DYSURIA
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE ACUTE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA EXERTIONAL
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
NASAL CONGESTION
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
SINUS CONGESTION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ACNE
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ALOPECIA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ROSACEA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN LESION
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
XANTHOMA
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
HOT FLUSH
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Additional Information

Study Director

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Phone: 862-778-8300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER