Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of LCQ908 in Subjects With Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome (NCT NCT01514461)
NCT ID: NCT01514461
Last Updated: 2015-06-03
Results Overview
Blood samples were collected for a fasting lipid panel, including triglycerides. If the 12-week value was missing, the measurement value at 12 weeks or the last available post-baseline measurement value during the double-blind treatment period was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the average of fasting triglyceride values taken at day -3 and day 1. Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressing as a percentage change from baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
45 participants
Baseline to 12 weeks
2015-06-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
12
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Patient/guardian decision
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of LCQ908 in Subjects With Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
Total
n=45 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
|
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61 • n=7 Participants
|
42.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94 • n=5 Participants
|
45.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
< 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized. The number of randomized patients with non-missing fasting triglycerides values at baseline and Week 12 are included in this analysis.
Blood samples were collected for a fasting lipid panel, including triglycerides. If the 12-week value was missing, the measurement value at 12 weeks or the last available post-baseline measurement value during the double-blind treatment period was analyzed. Baseline is defined as the average of fasting triglyceride values taken at day -3 and day 1. Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressing as a percentage change from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides From Baseline to 12 Weeks
|
45.6 percent change
Interval 6.8 to 98.7
|
3.7 percent change
Interval -24.3 to 42.1
|
-13.9 percent change
Interval -38.9 to 21.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.
Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
21.4 Percentage of participants
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
|
30.8 Percentage of participants
|
35.7 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline or Final Fasting TG < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
|
21.4 Percentage of participants
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.
Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
|
30.8 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Final Fasting Triglycerides < 8.4 mmol/L (750 mg/dL)
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.
Percentage calculated as (m/n)\*100 where m = number of patients who respond; n = the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 12 (n = 14, 14, 12)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 24 (n = 13, 14, 12)
|
15.4 Percentage of participants
|
28.6 Percentage of participants
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients Responding to Investigational Treatment by Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) of at Least 40% From Baseline
Week 52 (n = 11, 14, 11)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.
Percentage of patients reaching target values of \<1000 mg/dL or target values of \< 2000 mg/dL for fasting triglycerides is reported. Pecentage calculated as (m/n)\*100; where 'm' The number of patients who reach target values for fasting triglyceride, 'n' the number of patients with non-missing fasting triglyceride.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 12 (n=14,14,12)
|
14.3 Percentage of patients
|
21.4 Percentage of patients
|
33.3 Percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 24 (n=13,14,12)
|
30.8 Percentage of patients
|
21.4 Percentage of patients
|
25.0 Percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 1000 mg/dL, week 52 (n=11,14,11)
|
27.3 Percentage of patients
|
14.3 Percentage of patients
|
36.4 Percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 12 (n=14,14,12)
|
35.7 Percentage of patients
|
50.0 Percentage of patients
|
83.3 Percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 24 (n=13,14,12)
|
38.5 Percentage of patients
|
57.1 Percentage of patients
|
58.3 Percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving Fasting Triglycerides (TG) Target Thresholds
TG < 2000 mg/dL, week 52 (n=11,14,11)
|
36.4 Percentage of patients
|
50.0 Percentage of patients
|
63.6 Percentage of patients
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeksPopulation: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides
Week 24 (n=13, 14, 12)
|
4.9 Percent change
Interval -26.6 to 50.1
|
-15.8 Percent change
Interval -40.5 to 19.3
|
5.5 Percent change
Interval -28.0 to 54.5
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides
Week 52 (n=11, 14, 11)
|
15.2 Percent change
Interval -23.0 to 72.5
|
-6.7 Percent change
Interval -36.4 to 36.9
|
4.9 Percent change
Interval -31.2 to 60.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-24 hours at Baseline, Week 12Population: Full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients, except for those who were mis-randomized. For each category, the number of randomized patients who have non-missing values are included in this analysis.
Post prandial peak triglycerides - maximum triglyceride value over 0-24 hours Post prandial triglycerides AUC0-24 - area under the time curve for triglycerides over 0-24 Adjusted geometric means are calculated by back-transforming the adjusted means from the model and expressed as a percentage change from baseline. hours
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline for Postprandial Triglycerides Following the Standardized Meal Tolerance Test at Week 12
Triglycerides (Peak 0-24h) [n=12, 12, 11)
|
56.9 Percent change
Interval 6.9 to 130.2
|
8.6 Percent change
Interval -24.8 to 56.8
|
6.3 Percent change
Interval -30.3 to 62.2
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline for Postprandial Triglycerides Following the Standardized Meal Tolerance Test at Week 12
Triglycerides (AUC 0-24h) [n=12, 12, 11)
|
44.5 Percent change
Interval -1.3 to 111.5
|
0.8 Percent change
Interval -30.1 to 45.1
|
2.8 Percent change
Interval -32.4 to 56.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
Lowest observed blood concentration (Cmin) and observed maximum blood concentration (Cmax) following drug administration derived from non-compartmental analysis using scheduled sampling time for the whole dataset.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908 - Trough Concentration (Cmin) and Observed Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax)
Cmin
|
312 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 120
|
426 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 224
|
—
|
|
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908 - Trough Concentration (Cmin) and Observed Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax)
Cmax
|
603 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 244
|
745 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 408
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours after drug administration was calculated by using linear trapezoidal rule.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve AUC (0-24hour)
|
11000 ng/mL *hr
Standard Deviation 4100
|
14300 ng/mL *hr
Standard Deviation 7390
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Time to Reach Maximum Concentration Following Drug Administration Tmax (Hours)
|
6 hours
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
|
8 hours
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours at Week 12Population: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Average observed blood concentration measured by (AUC0-24)/24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=9 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics of LCQ908- Average Observed Blood Concentration (Cavg)
|
459 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 171
|
597 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 308
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 weeksPopulation: Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20mg
n=15 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 Participants
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
At least one adverse events
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
At least one serious adverse event
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Patients Reported With Any Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event and Death
Death
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
LCQ908 20 mg
LCQ908 40 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen will follow. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet will be followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ARREST
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDER
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS ACUTE
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
HYPERTRANSAMINASAEMIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
INCISIONAL HERNIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MALIGNANT PALATE NEOPLASM
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
FEMORAL ARTERY OCCLUSION
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 20 mg
n=15 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen will follow. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 10 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet will be followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
LCQ908 40 mg
n=14 participants at risk
In period II (0-12 weeks) double-blind treatment: one LCQ908 40 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 20mg tablet, once daily. No dose titration allowed. In period III (12-52 weeks) double blind treatment: Without down titration, the period II dosing regimen was followed. Following decision to down titrate: one LCQ908 20 mg active tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 40 mg tablet + one LCQ908 placebo matching to 10mg tablets, once daily. A low fat diet was followed and recorded in patient diary.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LEUKOPENIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
THROMBOCYTOPENIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC ARREST
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
PALPITATIONS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
SUPRAVENTRICULAR EXTRASYSTOLES
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
DEAFNESS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
BLEPHARITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
CONJUNCTIVAL HAEMORRHAGE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL DISTENSION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
46.7%
7/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL RIGIDITY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
BARRETT'S OESOPHAGUS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
CHANGE OF BOWEL HABIT
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DEFAECATION URGENCY
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DENTAL CARIES
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
|
66.7%
10/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
80.0%
12/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
71.4%
10/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIVERTICULUM
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DRY MOUTH
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPEPSIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ENTERITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
FAECES DISCOLOURED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
FAECES SOFT
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
FLATULENCE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
FREQUENT BOWEL MOVEMENTS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
HYPERCHLORHYDRIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
INGUINAL HERNIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
33.3%
5/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
RECTAL HAEMORRHAGE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
TOOTHACHE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
40.0%
6/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
ASTHENIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
CYST
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
FATIGUE
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
MALAISE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
PYREXIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLELITHIASIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
ALLERGY TO ARTHROPOD STING
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
ALLERGY TO PLANTS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Immune system disorders
FOOD ALLERGY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
CONJUNCTIVITIS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
CYSTITIS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
EAR INFECTION
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
ERYSIPELAS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS VIRAL
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HAND-FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
HORDEOLUM
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
JOINT ABSCESS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
LARYNGITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
LOCALISED INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PHARYNGITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
RHINITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
SUBCUTANEOUS ABSCESS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
TINEA INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
TOOTH ABSCESS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
TOOTH INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
CHEST INJURY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
CONTUSION
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIGAMENT SPRAIN
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LIMB INJURY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MUSCLE RUPTURE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
POST PROCEDURAL COMPLICATION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
RIB FRACTURE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SCAR
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPORTS INJURY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
TOOTH FRACTURE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
BLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
CAROTID BRUIT
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
HAEMOGLOBIN DECREASED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
14.3%
2/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
WEIGHT INCREASED
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DIABETES MELLITUS
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOCALCAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOGLYCAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
IRON DEFICIENCY
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
21.4%
3/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BURSITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCLE FATIGUE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCLE SPASMS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYOPATHY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
NECK PAIN
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
SJOGREN'S SYNDROME
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
TENDONITIS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
LIPOMA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NEOPLASM SKIN
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
PAPILLOMA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
DYSGEUSIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
26.7%
4/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
LETHARGY
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
SCIATICA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
STRESS
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
DYSURIA
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE ACUTE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
28.6%
4/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
|
20.0%
3/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA EXERTIONAL
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
NASAL CONGESTION
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
|
13.3%
2/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
SINUS CONGESTION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ACNE
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ALOPECIA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
7.1%
1/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ROSACEA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN LESION
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
XANTHOMA
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
HOT FLUSH
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
|
6.7%
1/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/15
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
0.00%
0/14
Safety set (SAF) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER