Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and BIAsp 30 in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01513590)

NCT ID: NCT01513590

Last Updated: 2019-03-26

Results Overview

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

394 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 0, week 26

Results posted on

2019-03-26

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at 47 sites in 10 countries: Algeria (4), Bulgaria (7), Croatia (5), Czech Republic (4), Germany (5), Poland (5), Romania (5), Slovakia (3), Turkey (2), and Ukraine (7).

Subjects continued their metformin monotherapy or metformin in any combination with one of the following OADs: insulin secretagogue (sulphonylurea or glinide), dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor, α-glucosidase inhibitors for at least 12 weeks prior to randomisation.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
IDegAsp BID
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Overall Study
STARTED
197
197
Overall Study
Exposed
196
195
Overall Study
COMPLETED
187
184
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
IDegAsp BID
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
3
Overall Study
Withdrawal Criteria
3
0
Overall Study
Unclassified
5
10

Baseline Characteristics

A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and BIAsp 30 in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=197 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=197 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Total
n=394 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=7 Participants
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
96 Participants
n=7 Participants
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants
n=5 Participants
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
203 Participants
n=5 Participants
Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
8.5 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
8.3 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=7 Participants
8.4 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
10.5 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=5 Participants
10.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=7 Participants
10.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=5 Participants
Body Weight
88.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=5 Participants
88.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=7 Participants
88.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=197 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=197 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
-1.85 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.97
-1.73 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. At baseline 195 subjects each in IDegAsp BID and BIAsp 30 BID treatment group were analysed.

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) after 26 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=195 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-4.44 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.97
-3.03 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.90

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after last exposure to investigational product

Population: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.

The pool of severe and minor hypoglycaemic episodes was referred to as confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes, which is presented here. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as occurring between 00:01 and 05:59 am.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal (00:01-05:59 am) Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
60 episodes
260 episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after last exposure to investigational product

Population: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.

The pool of severe and minor hypoglycaemic episodes was referred to as confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes, which is presented here. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Number of Severe and Minor Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes
553 episodes
1221 episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
2.8 kg
Standard Deviation 4.1
2.0 kg
Standard Deviation 4.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Data for 15 subjects were excluded, as only subjects exposed for at least 12 weeks were included in this measurement.

Responder for HbA1c (\<7.0%) without severe and minor treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment. Severe + minor hypoglycaemic episodes = confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes: requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes: able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=192 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=187 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Responder for HbA1c (Below 7.0%) Without Severe and Minor Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment Including Only Subjects Exposed for at Least 12 Weeks
77 participants
59 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after exposure to investigational product

Population: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. Severity was assessed by investigator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Events
197 events
137 events
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Serious
20 events
12 events
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Severe
13 events
8 events
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Moderate
45 events
27 events
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Mild
139 events
102 events
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Fatal
2 events
2 events

Adverse Events

IDegAsp BID

Serious events: 13 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

BIAsp 30 BID

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 participants at risk
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery insufficiency
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
1.0%
2/195 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness neurosensory
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Eye disorders
Optic ischaemic neuropathy
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic stenosis
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia, obstructive
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Infections and infestations
Meningitis pneumococcal
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Infections and infestations
Peritonsillar abscess
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
1.0%
2/196 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer stage I
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Nervous system disorders
Hypoglycaemic unconsciousness
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
IDegAsp BID
n=196 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 participants at risk
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
7.7%
15/196 • Number of events 17 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
3.6%
7/195 • Number of events 10 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.

Additional Information

Public Access to Clinical Trials

Novo Nordisk A/S

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Novo Nordisk maintains the right to be informed of any Investigator plans for publication and to review any scientific paper, presentation, communication or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol. Any such communication must be submitted in writing to the Novo Nordisk trial manager prior to submission for comments. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the planned communication.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER