Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and BIAsp 30 in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01513590)
NCT ID: NCT01513590
Last Updated: 2019-03-26
Results Overview
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
394 participants
Week 0, week 26
2019-03-26
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 47 sites in 10 countries: Algeria (4), Bulgaria (7), Croatia (5), Czech Republic (4), Germany (5), Poland (5), Romania (5), Slovakia (3), Turkey (2), and Ukraine (7).
Subjects continued their metformin monotherapy or metformin in any combination with one of the following OADs: insulin secretagogue (sulphonylurea or glinide), dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor, α-glucosidase inhibitors for at least 12 weeks prior to randomisation.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
197
|
197
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed
|
196
|
195
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
187
|
184
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal Criteria
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Unclassified
|
5
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart and BIAsp 30 in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=197 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=197 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
Total
n=394 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=7 Participants
|
58.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
102 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
203 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
8.5 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
|
8.3 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=7 Participants
|
8.4 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
|
10.5 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=5 Participants
|
10.0 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=7 Participants
|
10.2 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Weight
|
88.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=5 Participants
|
88.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=7 Participants
|
88.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=197 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=197 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
|
-1.85 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
-1.73 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. At baseline 195 subjects each in IDegAsp BID and BIAsp 30 BID treatment group were analysed.
Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) after 26 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=195 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-4.44 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.97
|
-3.03 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after last exposure to investigational productPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
The pool of severe and minor hypoglycaemic episodes was referred to as confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes, which is presented here. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as occurring between 00:01 and 05:59 am.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal (00:01-05:59 am) Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
60 episodes
|
260 episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after last exposure to investigational productPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
The pool of severe and minor hypoglycaemic episodes was referred to as confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes, which is presented here. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Severe and Minor Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
553 episodes
|
1221 episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26Population: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
|
2.8 kg
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
2.0 kg
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Data for 15 subjects were excluded, as only subjects exposed for at least 12 weeks were included in this measurement.
Responder for HbA1c (\<7.0%) without severe and minor treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment. Severe + minor hypoglycaemic episodes = confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes: requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes: able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=192 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=187 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Responder for HbA1c (Below 7.0%) Without Severe and Minor Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Last 12 Weeks of Treatment Including Only Subjects Exposed for at Least 12 Weeks
|
77 participants
|
59 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Onset on or after the first day of exposure to investigational product and no later than 7 days after exposure to investigational productPopulation: The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. Severity was assessed by investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 Participants
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 Participants
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Events
|
197 events
|
137 events
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Serious
|
20 events
|
12 events
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Severe
|
13 events
|
8 events
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Moderate
|
45 events
|
27 events
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Mild
|
139 events
|
102 events
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)
Fatal
|
2 events
|
2 events
|
Adverse Events
IDegAsp BID
BIAsp 30 BID
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 participants at risk
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
1.0%
2/195 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Deafness neurosensory
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Eye disorders
Optic ischaemic neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colonic stenosis
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia, obstructive
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis pneumococcal
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonsillar abscess
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
1.0%
2/196 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer stage I
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoglycaemic unconsciousness
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 2 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.51%
1/196 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.00%
0/195 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/196 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
0.51%
1/195 • Number of events 1 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IDegAsp BID
n=196 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. IDegAsp was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
BIAsp 30 BID
n=195 participants at risk
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) was given subcutaneously twice daily (BID) with metformin. BIAsp 30 was given with the breakfast meal and main evening meal.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.7%
15/196 • Number of events 17 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
3.6%
7/195 • Number of events 10 • From the first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the informed consent (Week -1) and until post-treatment follow-up period (Week 27).
The safety analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product or its comparator.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Novo Nordisk maintains the right to be informed of any Investigator plans for publication and to review any scientific paper, presentation, communication or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol. Any such communication must be submitted in writing to the Novo Nordisk trial manager prior to submission for comments. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the planned communication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER