Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Observational Study of Peginterferon (e.g. Pegasys)-Based Direct Acting Antiviral Triple Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 (NCT NCT01508130)
NCT ID: NCT01508130
Last Updated: 2017-04-10
Results Overview
Time to premature treatment discontinuation for any reason (weeks) was calculated as follows: date of treatment discontinuation for any reason - first treatment administration date + 1/7. The estimated survivorship curves were obtained from Kaplan-Meier maximum likelihood estimates for each treatment group. Participants who completed the study treatment (including those who shorten the treatment based on response-guided therapy) were censored on their last dosing date.
COMPLETED
672 participants
Up to the treatment discontinuation or the date of the last dosing for participants who were ongoing or completed the study treatment (including those who shorten the treatment based on response-guided therapy)
2017-04-10
Participant Flow
A total of 672 participants were enrolled at 64 study sites in the U.S between 20 January 2012 and 8 February 2013.
Out of 672 participants, one was not eligible to receive triple therapy (pegylated interferon alfa \[PegIFN\], ribavirin \[RBV\], and telaprevir or boceprevir) and 17 who received only dual therapy (PegIFN + RBV) were excluded from all analyses. A total of 635 participants were included in modified all treated (mTRT) population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received PegIFN + RBV + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
493
|
142
|
|
Overall Study
mTRT
|
493
|
142
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
266
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
227
|
69
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received PegIFN + RBV + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
81
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
25
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Subject's substantial non-compliance
|
25
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Insufficient therapeutic response
|
74
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative
|
14
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Observational Study of Peginterferon (e.g. Pegasys)-Based Direct Acting Antiviral Triple Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
Total
n=635 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=7 Participants
|
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
209 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
265 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
284 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
370 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to the treatment discontinuation or the date of the last dosing for participants who were ongoing or completed the study treatment (including those who shorten the treatment based on response-guided therapy)Population: modified all-treated (mTRT) population: It included all enrolled participants who had an hepatitis C Virus Ribo Nucleic Acid (HCV RNA) of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start chronic hepatitis C (CHC) therapy, received 1 triple therapy (PegIFN, RBV, and TEL or BOC), and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups.
Time to premature treatment discontinuation for any reason (weeks) was calculated as follows: date of treatment discontinuation for any reason - first treatment administration date + 1/7. The estimated survivorship curves were obtained from Kaplan-Meier maximum likelihood estimates for each treatment group. Participants who completed the study treatment (including those who shorten the treatment based on response-guided therapy) were censored on their last dosing date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Premature Treatment Discontinuation Due to Any Reason
|
40.0 weeks
Interval 34.0 to
An upper limit of CI was non-estimable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
40.6 weeks
Interval 32.3 to 48.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks or later post-completion of the treatment periodPopulation: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups.
SVR rate defined as the number of participants with undetectable HCV RNA (i.e., HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL) at 12 weeks or later post-completion of the treatment period
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) at 12 Weeks or Later After Completion of the Treatment Period
|
160 participants
|
39 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48; and 12 weeks post-completion of treatment periodPopulation: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
VR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA (i.e.,HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 16, n= 266, 91
|
244 participants
|
86 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 2, n= 479, 138
|
104 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 4, n= 446, 137
|
348 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 6, n= 397, 128
|
327 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 8, n= 383, 125
|
349 participants
|
87 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 12, n= 359, 113
|
337 participants
|
102 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 20, n= 224, 80
|
209 participants
|
75 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 24, n= 190, 70
|
176 participants
|
67 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 28, n= 115, 29
|
105 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 32, n= 84, 23
|
78 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 36, n= 60, 16
|
56 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 40, n= 35, 10
|
33 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 44, n= 24, 6
|
23 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
Week 48, n= 13, 1
|
13 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Virologic Response (VR)
12 weeks post-completion, n= 187, 53
|
160 participants
|
39 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
VRVR was defined as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at treatment Week 2; RVR as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL by treatment Week 4, but no HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at Week 2; Week 8 VR as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL by study Week 8 but no HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at Weeks 2 to 4; cEVR as HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL by treatment Week 12 but no HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at Weeks 2 to 8; and pEVR as at least a 2 log10 decrease in HCV RNA by treatment Week 12 but no HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at Weeks 2 to 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
VRVR, Week 2, n= 479, 138
|
104 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
RVR, Week 4, n= 446, 137
|
252 participants
|
16 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
VR Week 8, n= 383, 125
|
28 participants
|
56 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
cEVR, Week 12, n= 359, 113
|
17 participants
|
18 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
pEVR, Weeks 2 to 12, n= 359, 113
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With VR by Categories of Very Rapid VR (VRVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), VR Week 8, Early Virological Response (cEVR), Partial Virological Response (pEVR), and None of the Above
None of above, Weeks 2 to 12, n= 359, 113
|
7 participants
|
7 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
The extended VR is defined as initial HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL during Weeks 2 to 24 and remaining HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at all subsequent assessments; virologic breakthrough/rebound is defined as detectable HCV RNA during the treatment period in participants with prior non-detectable HCV RNA or increase of HCV RNA by \>=1 log10 above nadir for direct-acting antiviral (DAA) tripe therapies (PegIFN + RBV + TEL or PegIFN + RBV + BOC); virologic relapse is defined as detectable HCV RNA during the treatment-free follow-up period in participants with HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at EoT; non-responder is defined as participants who never achieved undetectable HCV-RNA during the 48 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Extended VR, Virologic Breakthrough/Rebound, Virologic Relapse, and Who Were Non-responder
Extended VR, n= 491, 142
|
159 participants
|
39 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Extended VR, Virologic Breakthrough/Rebound, Virologic Relapse, and Who Were Non-responder
Virologic breakthrough/rebound, n= 491, 142
|
52 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Extended VR, Virologic Breakthrough/Rebound, Virologic Relapse, and Who Were Non-responder
Virologic relapse, n= 491, 142
|
174 participants
|
52 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Extended VR, Virologic Breakthrough/Rebound, Virologic Relapse, and Who Were Non-responder
Non-responders, n= 479, 138
|
34 participants
|
16 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
SVR rate defined as the number of participants with undetectable HCV RNA (i.e., HCV RNA less than 50 IU/mL) at 12 weeks or later post-completion of the treatment period. The predictors defined as participants with virological response (HCV RNA \< 50 IU/mL at any visit), or with virological response at Week 12 (HCV-RNA \< 50 IU/mL or unquantifiable or HCV-RNA \>=2 log10 drop from baseline). Positive predictive value is the probability that participants with a positive screening test truly have the disease. Negative predictive value is the probability that participants with a negative screening test truly don't have the disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 2, positive predictors, n=104, 3
|
43 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 4, positive predictors, n=350, 19
|
138 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 6, positive predictors, n=336, 33
|
142 participants
|
17 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 8, positive predictors, n=355, 88
|
147 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 12, positive predictors, n=348, 102
|
146 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
VR, Week 12, positive predictors, n=347, 106
|
146 participants
|
37 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 2, negative predictors, n=375, 135
|
258 participants
|
97 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 4, negative predictors, n=96, 118
|
74 participants
|
89 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 6, negative predictors, n=61, 95
|
50 participants
|
74 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 8, negative predictors, n=28, 37
|
24 participants
|
32 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
Week 12, negative predictors, n=11, 11
|
11 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Predictors of Sustained Virologic Response by Week
VR, Week 12, negative predictors, n=12, 7
|
12 participants
|
6 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
Participants for VR to prior therapy (PegIFN + RBV) were categorized as: relapse (who completed the previous treatment with HCV RNA undetectable, but relapsed with detectable HCV RNA once treatment was discontinued), breakthrough (HCV RNA undetectable, followed by detectable HCV RNA during on-treatment period), null responder (completed at least 12 weeks of treatment with HCV RNA decrease \< 2 log10 at Week 12), partial responder (HCV RNA decrease \> 2 log10 by Week 12 of treatment and HCV RNA remained detectable), unknown response (completed previous treatment, but treatment response based on HCV RNA determinations was not available), and prior intolerant (treated previously, but discontinued due to adverse event or participant's choice prior to completion of therapy). Participants categorized into 3 genotypes (CC, CT and TT) based on single nucleotide polymorphism in the Interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Sex : Female, n = 209, 56
|
76 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Sex: Male, n = 284, 86
|
84 participants
|
17 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Age: < 50 years, n = 144, 47
|
49 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Age: >= 50 years, n = 349, 95
|
111 participants
|
25 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Race: White, n = 336, 102
|
112 participants
|
31 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Race: non-white, n = 157, 40
|
48 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino, n = 42, 11
|
21 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Ethnicity: Not Hispanic or Latino, n = 450, 128
|
139 participants
|
36 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
Ethnicity: Unknown, n = 1, 3
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
HCV Genotype: 1a, n = 350, 94
|
109 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
HCV Genotype: 1b, n = 96, 30
|
43 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
HCV Genotype: Other(2,3,4) , n = 45, 17
|
7 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
HCV Genotype: missing, n = 2, 1
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
IL28B Genotype: CC, n = 37, 12
|
17 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
IL28B Genotype: CT, n = 85, 31
|
28 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
IL28B Genotype: TT, n = 24, 6
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
IL28B Genotype: not available, n = 347, 93
|
110 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: relapser, n = 64, 21
|
26 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: breakthrough, n = 3, 2
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: null responder, n = 62, 10
|
11 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: partial responder, n = 29, 7
|
8 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: unknown response, n = 21, 1
|
11 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: prior intolerant, n = 22, 14
|
5 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With SVR by Subgroups (Demographic and Baseline Factors)
VR to Prior Therapy: missing, n = 291, 87
|
97 participants
|
28 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups.
The undetectable HCV RNA means HCV RNA values less than 50 IU/mL. This outcome measure was calculated as the duration of participant's first date of undetectable HCV RNA and the date of the participant's last dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=159 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=39 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Viral Undetectability During Treatment for Participants With HCV RNA Undetectable During Treatment by Trial Treatment
|
22.1 weeks
Interval 0.0 to 52.0
|
23.0 weeks
Interval 5.0 to 44.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups.
The participants discontinued the study treatment due to lack of efficacy of study treatment. Time to premature treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy (weeks) = (date of treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy - first treatment administration date + 1)/7. Participants who were ongoing or completed the study treatment (including those who shortened the treatment based on response-guided therapy) were censored at the date of their last dosing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Premature Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
NA Weeks
Interval 0.1 to 64.3
Median was non-estimable due to insufficient number of participants with premature treatment discontinuation.
|
NA Weeks
Interval 3.9 to 50.7
Median was non-estimable due to insufficient number of participants with premature treatment discontinuation.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: mTRT population: It included all enrolled participants with HCV RNA of 50 IU/mL or more just prior to start CHC therapy, received 1 triple therapy, and treatment documentation was sufficient for assignment to treatment groups.
The participants discontinued the study treatment due to intolerance of the study treatment. Time to premature treatment discontinuation due to intolerance (weeks) = (date of treatment discontinuation due to lack of intolerance - first treatment administration date + 1)/7. Participants who were ongoing or completed the study treatment (including those who shortened the treatment based on response-guided therapy) were censored at the date of their last dosing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Premature Treatment Discontinuation Due to Intolerance
|
NA Weeks
Interval 0.1 to 64.3
Median was non-estimable due to insufficient number of participants with premature treatment discontinuation.
|
NA Weeks
Interval 3.9 to 50.7
Median was non-estimable due to insufficient number of participants with premature treatment discontinuation.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of the study drug up to withdrawal/study completion (up to Study Week 48)Population: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
Extent of exposure is defined as the duration of the treatment administered during the study. The mean duration of exposure to PegIFN alfa-2a, PegIFN alfa-2b, ribavirin, telaprevir, and boceprevir is calculated as the number of weeks between the start and end of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Duration, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2a, n = 465, 127
|
26.0 Weeks
Standard Error 0.71
|
26.8 Weeks
Standard Error 1.16
|
|
Treatment Duration, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2b, n = 28, 15
|
23.2 Weeks
Standard Error 2.58
|
34.0 Weeks
Standard Error 3.12
|
|
Treatment Duration, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Ribavirin, n = 490, 142
|
26.1 Weeks
Standard Error 0.69
|
27.6 Weeks
Standard Error 1.11
|
|
Treatment Duration, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Telaprevir, n = 490, NA
|
13.4 Weeks
Standard Error 0.39
|
NA Weeks
Standard Error NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Treatment Duration, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Boceprevir, n = NA, 142
|
NA Weeks
Standard Error NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
22.1 Weeks
Standard Error 1.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of the study drug up to withdrawal/study completion (up to Study Week 48)Population: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
Extent of exposure is defined as the duration of the treatment administered during the study. The mean cumulative doses of PegIFN alfa-2a, PegIFN alfa-2b, ribavirin, telaprevir, and boceprevir were presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Cumulative Dose, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Boceprevir, n = NA, 142
|
NA Micrograms
Standard Deviation NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
52979.7 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 30728.6
|
|
Mean Cumulative Dose, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2a, n = 465, 127
|
4504.5 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 2679.7
|
4478.1 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 2275.6
|
|
Mean Cumulative Dose, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2b, n = 28, 15
|
3234.5 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 2008.5
|
4239.1 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 1723.5
|
|
Mean Cumulative Dose, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Ribavirin, n = 490, 142
|
24991.1 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 16058.1
|
26215.9 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 14292.7
|
|
Mean Cumulative Dose, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Telaprevir, n = 490, NA
|
29734.2 Micrograms
Standard Deviation 18776.5
|
NA Micrograms
Standard Deviation NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of the first dose of the study drug up to withdrawal/study completion (up to Study Week 48)Population: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
Extent of exposure is defined as the duration of the treatment administered during the study. Degree of dose reduction was calculated as actual exposure/target exposure × 100%. Target exposure was defined as the actual received treatment duration multiplied by the initial assigned dose. Actual exposure was defined as cumulative dose during the treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Dose Reduction, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2a, n = 465, 127
|
102.5 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
104.8 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
|
Percentage of Dose Reduction, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
PegIFN alfa-2b, n = 28, 15
|
101.2 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
111.7 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 23.6
|
|
Percentage of Dose Reduction, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Ribavirin, n = 490, 142
|
116.8 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 26.6
|
118.2 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
|
Percentage of Dose Reduction, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Telaprevir, n = 490, NA
|
100.0 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
NA Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Dose Reduction, as Measure of Extent of Exposure to Study Medication
Boceprevir, n = NA, 142
|
NA Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation NA
Not applicable for this group.
|
99.8 Percentage of dose reduction
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24Population: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
Compliance was assessed based on the number of participants who received the planned study treatment (PegIFN alfa-2a, PegIFN alfa-2b, ribavirin, telaprevir, and boceprevir) during the treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Boceprevir Week 12; n = NA, 101
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
89 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
PegIFN Week 4; n = 345, 114
|
342 participants
|
113 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
PegIFN Week 8; n = 319, 107
|
312 participants
|
103 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
PegIFN Week 12; n = 310, 106
|
304 participants
|
101 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
PegIFN Week 24; n = 265, 88
|
259 participants
|
83 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Ribavirin Week 4; n = 337, 111
|
331 participants
|
105 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Ribavirin Week 8; n = 293, 101
|
281 participants
|
100 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Ribavirin Week 12; n = 288, 98
|
279 participants
|
93 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Ribavirin Week 24; n = 187, 77
|
180 participants
|
69 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Telaprevir Week 4; n = 340, NA
|
329 participants
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Telaprevir Week 8; n = 309, NA
|
289 participants
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Telaprevir Week 12; n = 273, NA
|
255 participants
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Telaprevir Week 24; n = 68, NA
|
67 participants
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Boceprevir Week 4; n = NA, 34
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
33 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Boceprevir Week 8; n = NA, 103
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
93 participants
|
|
Compliance of Study Treatment
Boceprevir Week 24; n = NA, 82
|
NA participants
Not applicable for this group.
|
70 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks (included 12 weeks of triple therapy + additional 12/36 weeks of dual therapy)Population: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
As per the U.S. labeling, participants with treatment-naive, prior relapse (TN-PR) and prior partial or null responder (PP/NR) received PegIFN + RBV + TEL (triple therapy) for 12 weeks; followed additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and TEL as Per the U.S. Label
TN-PR, 12 weeks, n = 352
|
190 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and TEL as Per the U.S. Label
TN-PR, additional 12 weeks, n = 352
|
75 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and TEL as Per the U.S. Label
TN-PR, additional 36 weeks, n = 352
|
8 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and TEL as Per the U.S. Label
PP/NR, 12 weeks, n = 90
|
58 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and TEL as Per the U.S. Label
PP/NR, additional 36 weeks, n = 90
|
25 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks (included 4 weeks of dual therapy + additional 28/36 weeks of triple therapy and/or additional dual therapy up to Week 48)Population: The safety population was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
As per the U.S. labeling, participants with cirrhosis (C); non-cirrhotic/treatment-naïve (NC/TN); and non-cirrhotic/previous partial responders or relapsers (NC/PPR or R) received first 4 weeks of dual therapy, followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + BOC (triple therapy) and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/TN, 4 weeks, n = 60
|
59 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/TN, additional 28 weeks, n = 24
|
15 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/TN, additional 36 weeks, n = 7
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/TN, dual therapy through 48 week, n = 7
|
2 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/PPR or R, 4 weeks, n = 17
|
17 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/PPR, additional 36 weeks, n = 7
|
3 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
NC/PPR, dual therapy through 48 week, n = 3
|
1 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Treated With PegIFN, RBV, and BOC as Per the U.S. Label
C, completed 44 weeks, n = 34
|
1 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeksPopulation: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
The dose reduction was done because of safety-related reasons (AEs) including alanine aminotransferase disorder, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and rash.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Safety-related Dose Reductions
|
190 participants
|
70 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeksPopulation: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered to be related to the medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Premature Treatment Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
|
80 participants
|
28 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks post-treatmentPopulation: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. All 671 participants received at least one dose of study drug; however, 632 of these participants were included in the safety population.
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered to be related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any AEs and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any AEs
|
470 participants
|
142 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Any AEs and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any SAEs
|
76 participants
|
16 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 ), Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 12 weeks post-treatmentPopulation: Safety population: It included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. "n" denotes number of participants who were available at the indicated time points for each arm.
WPAI-AS is a 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to ankylosing spondylitis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). Each sub-scores was scaled as 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired). Higher scores indicated greater impairment and less productivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=493 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 Participants
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 6, Overall work impairment (n = 25, 4)
|
32.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.02
|
24.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 15.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 6, Activity impairment (n = 75, 29)
|
17.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.76
|
21.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 8, Work Time Missed (; n = 48, 10)
|
24.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.03
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 11.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 2, Work Time Missed, n = 37, 7
|
14.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.09
|
13.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 2, Impairment While Working (n = 36, 8)
|
9.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.79
|
19.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 8.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 2, Overall work impairment (n = 35, 7)
|
11.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.31
|
26.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 2, Activity impairment (n = 93, 33)
|
16.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.75
|
16.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 4, Work Time Missed (n = 58, 16)
|
10.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.68
|
13.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 4, Impairment While Working (n = 55, 16)
|
21.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.89
|
20.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 4, Overall work impairment (n = 55, 16)
|
25.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.25
|
22.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 4, Activity impairment (n = 142, 49)
|
23.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.73
|
11.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 6, Work Time Missed (n = 25, 4)
|
10.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.34
|
31.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 11.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 6, Impairment While Working (n = 25, 4)
|
25.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.36
|
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 16.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 8, Impairment While Working (n = 45, 11)
|
29.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.77
|
7.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 8, Overall work impairment (n = 44, 10)
|
37.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.15
|
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 8, Activity impairment (n = 109, 40)
|
30.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.20
|
21.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 12, Work Time Missed (n = 50, 11)
|
17.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.72
|
-3.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 10.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 12, Impairment While Working (n = 46, 10)
|
28.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.39
|
9.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 12, Overall work impairment (n = 46,11)
|
34.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.43
|
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 12, Activity impairment (n = 119, 41)
|
27.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.99
|
20.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 16, Work Time Missed (n = 31, 10)
|
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.56
|
7.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 10.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 16, Impairment While Working (n = 32, 10)
|
21.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.94
|
19.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 11.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 16, Overall work impairment (n = 31, 10)
|
23.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.43
|
16.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 11.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 16, Activity impairment (n = 87, 36)
|
22.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.90
|
19.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 24, Work Time Missed (n = 22, 7)
|
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.09
|
17.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 24, Impairment While Working (n = 21, 7)
|
18.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 8.35
|
11.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 15.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 24, Overall work impairment (n = 21, 7)
|
16.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.59
|
25.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 13.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 24, Activity impairment (n = 75, 35)
|
14.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.97
|
13.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 36, Work Time Missed (n = 10, 1)
|
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.74
|
9.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 26.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 36, Impairment While Working (n = 9, 1)
|
14.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 12.91
|
40.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 47.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 36, Overall work impairment (n = 10, 1)
|
13.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 14.16
|
34.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 55.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 36, Activity impairment (n = 28, 8)
|
16.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 6.21
|
10.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 12.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 48, Work Time Missed (n = 4, 1)
|
3.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 50.76
|
119.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 181.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 48, Impairment While Working (n = 3, 1)
|
71.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 52.43
|
-5.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 145.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 48, Overall work impairment (n = 4, 1)
|
71.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 48.32
|
-67.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 173.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
Wk 48, Activity impairment (n = 8, 1)
|
35.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 14.41
|
37.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 59.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
EOT visit, Work Time Missed (n = 49, 10)
|
8.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.20
|
5.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
EOT visit, Impairment While Working (n = 47, 10)
|
20.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.10
|
15.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
EOT visit, Overall work impairment (n = 48, 10)
|
24.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.45
|
16.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 10.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
EOT visit, Activity impairment (n = 143, 44)
|
18.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.97
|
14.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 5.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
12 Wks in FU, Work Time Missed (n = 19, 3)
|
16.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 8.11
|
-32.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 21.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
12 Wks in FU, Impairment While Working (n = 19, 3)
|
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.51
|
3.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
12 Wks in FU, Overall work impairment (n = 18, 3)
|
13.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 9.17
|
-24.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 24.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Work Loss And Productivity Outcomes (WPAI)
12 Wks in FU, Activity impairment (n = 67, 17)
|
0.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.86
|
-11.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 7.66
|
Adverse Events
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 participants at risk
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 participants at risk
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.61%
3/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
1.4%
2/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
1.4%
2/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal sepsis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis bacterial
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
2.2%
11/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
2.1%
3/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemolytic anaemia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Normochromic normocytic Anaemia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis erosive
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhoidal hemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhage Vomiting
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.82%
4/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Cyst
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Localised oedema
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
1.4%
2/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, auditory
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary mass
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash pruritic
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve stenosis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophagia
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
|
0.41%
2/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic cancer
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.61%
3/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Investigations
Anticoagulation drug level below therapeutic
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Investigations
Urine output decreased
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.70%
1/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.20%
1/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
0.00%
0/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PegIFN + RBV + TEL
n=490 participants at risk
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) + telaprevir (TEL) for 12 weeks; followed by additional 12 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy) depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
PegIFN + RBV + BOC
n=142 participants at risk
As per the standard of care and U.S. labeling, participants received first 4 weeks of PegIFN + RBV (dual therapy), followed by additional 28 or 36 weeks of PegIFN + RBV + boceprevir (BOC) therapy, and/or then completed dual therapy through Week 48 depending on viral response and prior response status.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza-like illness
|
6.5%
32/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
14.8%
21/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
50.8%
249/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
61.3%
87/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
35.3%
173/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
40.8%
58/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
20.8%
102/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
19.7%
28/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Decreased appetite
|
13.7%
67/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
14.8%
21/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.0%
59/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
12.7%
18/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorectal discomfort
|
14.7%
72/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
1.4%
2/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
9.0%
44/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
8.5%
12/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
8.2%
40/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
7.7%
11/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal pruritus
|
6.7%
33/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
2.1%
3/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
5.9%
29/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
3.5%
5/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
19.0%
93/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
25.4%
36/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
14.3%
70/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
19.7%
28/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
4.7%
23/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
24.6%
35/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
7.8%
38/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
1.4%
2/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
|
6.5%
32/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
4.9%
7/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
6.9%
34/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
2.8%
4/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
54.1%
265/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
57.7%
82/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
14.1%
69/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
10.6%
15/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
12.0%
59/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
9.9%
14/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
25.5%
125/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
20.4%
29/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
16.9%
83/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
19.7%
28/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
|
11.4%
56/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
14.8%
21/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
9.8%
48/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
11.3%
16/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
20.8%
102/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
19.0%
27/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
14.5%
71/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
16.2%
23/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthenia
|
14.7%
72/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
6.3%
9/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
5.1%
25/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
7.7%
11/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
34.7%
170/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
16.2%
23/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
20.2%
99/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
12.0%
17/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash pruritic
|
13.3%
65/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
9.2%
13/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
11.0%
54/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
7.7%
11/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.5%
27/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
9.2%
13/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Investigations
Neutropenia
|
11.8%
58/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
22.5%
32/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Investigations
Thrombocytopenia
|
12.2%
60/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
12.7%
18/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Investigations
Leukopenia
|
4.7%
23/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
9.9%
14/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
14.5%
71/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
8.5%
12/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.0%
49/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
7.0%
10/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
8.0%
39/490 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
3.5%
5/142 • Up to 2 years
SAEs and other AEs were collected in the safety population, which was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (triple therapy) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
Additional Information
Roche Trial Information Hotline
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER