Sonalleve Fibroid Ablation Pivotal Clinical Trial for MR-HIFU of Uterine Fibroids
NCT ID: NCT01504308
Last Updated: 2017-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2/PHASE3
49 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Study of the Mirabilis High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound System for Non-Invasive Treatment of Uterine Fibroids
NCT01946178
Fibroid Ablation Study
NCT01226290
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Uterine Fibroids With Enhanced Sonication
NCT00365989
MR Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: Software V4.2 Validation
NCT00295217
ExAblate UF V2 System for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids
NCT01285960
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current medical treatments include invasive removal of the fibroid (hysterectomy, myomectomy), drug therapy, or treatments causing necrosis of the fibroid tissue such as ablation (freezing or heating) or embolization. It has been estimated that 600,000 hysterectomies are performed per year in the United States and more than half of the conducted hysterectomies are due to fibroids. For the relief of symptoms, women wishing to preserve the uterus may choose between invasive procedures of myomectomy, Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE), ablation or cryotherapy. The surgically invasive procedures require anesthesia, hospital stays, and long recovery periods. However, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) shows promising results in relieving fibroid symptoms.
This study will confirm the safety and clinical effectiveness of Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU Fibroid Therapy system for ablating symptomatic fibroids.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MR-HIFU treatment
Patients receiving MR-HIFU treatment
MR-HIFU treatment
A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Sham Treatment
Patients receiving sham treatment
Sham treatment
A pretend treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system in which no therapeutic ultrasound doses are delivered.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MR-HIFU treatment
A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with high-intensity focused ultrasound.
Sham treatment
A pretend treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system in which no therapeutic ultrasound doses are delivered.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ethnicity has a match with the intended profile for the site
* Weight \< 140kg or 310lbs
* Pre- or peri-menopausal as indicated by clinical evaluation or Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level \< 40 IU/L
* Willing and able to attend all study visits
* Willing and able to complete Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) assessment with Alkaline Hematin (AH) method
* Willing and able to use reliable contraception methods
* Uterine size \< 24 weeks
* Cervical cell assessment by Pap smear: Normal, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (SIL), Low risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) or Atypical Squamous Cells of Uncertain Significance (ASCUS) subtypes of cervical tissue
* MR-HIFU device accessibility to fibroids such that at least 50% of the total fibroid volume can be treated.
* Fibroids selected for treatment meeting the following criteria (further extrapolated in the protocol):
1. Total planned ablation volume of all fibroids should not exceed 250 ml and
2. No more than 5 fibroids should be planned for ablation and
3. Dominant fibroid (diameter) is greater than or equal to 3 cm and
4. Completely non-enhancing fibroids should not be treated as the identification of treated volume becomes ambiguous
* Patient's self-assessment indicates that she has had episodes of heavy menstrual bleeding in the past 6 months.
* Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) ≥150 ml and ≤ 500 ml
Exclusion Criteria
* Desire for future pregnancy
* Significant systemic disease even if controlled
* Positive pregnancy test
* Hematocrit \< 25%
* Extensive scarring along anterior lower abdominal wall (\>50% of area)
* Surgical clips in the potential path of the HIFU beam
* MRI contraindicated
* MRI contrast agent contraindicated (including renal insufficiency)
* Calcifications around or throughout uterine tissues that may affect treatment
* Communication barrier
* Highly perfused or brighter than myometrium in T2-weighted MRI (according to the T2 contrast obtained using the Philips MR-HIFU MR protocol) fibroids
* Fibroids not quantifiable on MRI (e.g. multi-fibroid cases where volume measurements are not feasible)
* Menses lasting \> 7 days or intermenstrual bleeding (patient can be included if there is endometrial biopsy within 6 months to exclude malignancy)
* Patient is currently on hormonal medication for fibroids or has a hormonal medication history as described below:
1. 1-month Lupron dose or equivalent: less than 1 month prior to MBL measurement or
2. 3-month Lupron dose or equivalent: less than 3 months prior to MBL measurement or
3. Depo Provera or equivalent: less than 6 months prior to MBL measurement
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philips Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John H Fischer II, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
Robert K Zurawin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
Elizabeth David, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hyo Keun Lim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Aytekin Oto, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Amanda Yunker, D.O.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Peter Liu, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Rajiv Chopra, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Oregon Science and Health University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS, Mali WP, Barkhausen J, Bartels LW, Deckers R, Frulio N, Rhim H, Lim HK, Eckey T, Nieminen HJ, Mougenot C, Keserci B, Soini J, Vaara T, Kohler MO, Sokka S, van den Bosch MA. Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2262-8. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345.
Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K, Mcdannold N, Inbar Y, Itzchak Y, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Geschwind JF, Hesley G, Gostout B, Ehrenstein T, Hengst S, Sklair-Levy M, Shushan A, Jolesz F. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831713.
Leon-Villapalos J, Kaniorou-Larai M, Dziewulski P. Full thickness abdominal burn following magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound therapy. Burns. 2005 Dec;31(8):1054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20. No abstract available.
Fennessy FM, Tempany CM. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas. Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.018.
Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, Inbar Y, Regan L, Gostout B, Hesley G, Kim HS, Hengst S, Gedroyc WM. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.072.
Fennessy FM, Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, So MJ, Hesley G, Gostout B, Kim HS, Holland GA, Sarti DA, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--results of different treatment protocols. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060267. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Mara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, Kuzel D, Haakova L. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
Stewart EA, Gostout B, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Regan L, Tempany CM. Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):279-87. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275283.39475.f6.
Taran FA, Tempany CM, Regan L, Inbar Y, Revel A, Stewart EA; MRgFUS Group. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) compared with abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):572-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7435.
Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Sawada K. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):584-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7455.
Okada A, Morita Y, Fukunishi H, Takeichi K, Murakami T. Non-invasive magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids in a large Japanese population: impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):579-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.7454.
Kim YS, Lim HK, Kim JH, Rhim H, Park BK, Keserci B, Kohler MO, Bae DS, Kim BG, Lee JW, Kim TJ, Sokka S, Lee JH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts immediate therapeutic response of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):639-47. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318220785c.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
G110008
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
994045
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.