Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cognitive Effects of Atomoxetine in Humans: Genetic Moderators (NCT NCT01498549)

NCT ID: NCT01498549

Last Updated: 2017-07-11

Results Overview

Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

35 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 years

Results posted on

2017-07-11

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Participants
Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 possible groups over a 3 day assessment period.
Overall Study
STARTED
39
Overall Study
Atomoxetine 40 mg
39
Overall Study
Atomoxetine 80 mg
37
Overall Study
Sugar Pill 0 mg
36
Overall Study
COMPLETED
35
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Cognitive Effects of Atomoxetine in Humans: Genetic Moderators

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Total Sample
n=39 Participants
This is the summary of the total sample used in the crossover design.
Age, Continuous
41.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.47 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: Participants that completed any arm in the crossover are included in the analysis.

Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=39 Participants
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=37 Participants
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
Sugar Pill 0mg
n=36 Participants
Sugar pill 0mg dose
Rapid Visual Information Processing
Descriminability
0.88 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.89 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.87 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.05
Rapid Visual Information Processing
Response Bias
0.87 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.86 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.16
0.89 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.22

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: Participants that completed any arm in the crossover are included in the analysis, participants with valid observations at both indices are included in the calculation.

Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=38 Participants
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=37 Participants
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
Sugar Pill 0mg
n=36 Participants
Sugar pill 0mg dose
Rapid Visual Information Processing: Mean Correct Response Latency
446.70 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 106.84
452.64 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 133.22
464.44 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 113.07

Adverse Events

Atomoxetine 40 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Atomoxetine 80 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sugar Pill 0 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
Sugar Pill 0 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Sugar pill 0 mg dose
General disorders
nausea
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
General disorders
headache
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
General disorders
other
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.

Additional Information

Dr. Mehmet Sofuoglu, Professor of Psychiatry; Director of VA New England Mental Illness Research, Ed

Yale University

Phone: (203) 937-4809

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place