Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cognitive Effects of Atomoxetine in Humans: Genetic Moderators (NCT NCT01498549)
NCT ID: NCT01498549
Last Updated: 2017-07-11
Results Overview
Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
2 years
2017-07-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Participants
Participants were randomly assigned to one of 3 possible groups over a 3 day assessment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
Atomoxetine 40 mg
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
Atomoxetine 80 mg
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
Sugar Pill 0 mg
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Cognitive Effects of Atomoxetine in Humans: Genetic Moderators
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total Sample
n=39 Participants
This is the summary of the total sample used in the crossover design.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.47 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Participants that completed any arm in the crossover are included in the analysis.
Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=39 Participants
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
|
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=37 Participants
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
|
Sugar Pill 0mg
n=36 Participants
Sugar pill 0mg dose
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing
Descriminability
|
0.88 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.89 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.87 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing
Response Bias
|
0.87 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.86 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.89 Proportion of Participants
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Participants that completed any arm in the crossover are included in the analysis, participants with valid observations at both indices are included in the calculation.
Cognitive Test to determine the speed of Visual information. The CANTAB Rapid Visual Information Processing test (RVP) is a measure of sustained attention with a small working memory component (Sahakian and Owen, 1992). Digits are rapidly (100/minute) and pseudo-randomly presented for 7 minutes. Subjects are instructed to press when the third digit of a target sequence (e.g. 3-5-7) is displayed. Primary outcomes are indices of target discriminability (A') and response bias (B") and response latency to targets.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=38 Participants
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
|
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=37 Participants
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
|
Sugar Pill 0mg
n=36 Participants
Sugar pill 0mg dose
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rapid Visual Information Processing: Mean Correct Response Latency
|
446.70 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 106.84
|
452.64 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 133.22
|
464.44 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 113.07
|
Adverse Events
Atomoxetine 40 mg
Atomoxetine 80 mg
Sugar Pill 0 mg
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Atomoxetine 40 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Atomoxetine 40 mg dose
|
Atomoxetine 80 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Atomoxetine 80 mg dose
|
Sugar Pill 0 mg
n=39 participants at risk
Sugar pill 0 mg dose
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
nausea
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
|
General disorders
headache
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
|
General disorders
other
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected once for each of the three visits on all enrolled subjects.
The assessment of adverse events utilized the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), an instrument that consists of 77 items.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Mehmet Sofuoglu, Professor of Psychiatry; Director of VA New England Mental Illness Research, Ed
Yale University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place