Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children in the Office (Inova Study) (NCT NCT01496287)
NCT ID: NCT01496287
Last Updated: 2024-08-06
Results Overview
Adverse events which are procedural, serious, and device-related.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
procedure up to 2 weeks post procedure
2024-08-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the Acclarent tympanostomy tube delivery system following delivery of anesthetic with Acclarent iontophoresis device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
70
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
64
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the Acclarent tympanostomy tube delivery system following delivery of anesthetic with Acclarent iontophoresis device
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Incomplete anesthesia
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children in the Office (Inova Study)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=70 Participants
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the Acclarent tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American or Black
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
47 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other or Unknown
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: procedure up to 2 weeks post procedureAdverse events which are procedural, serious, and device-related.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=70 Participants
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Procedural, Serious, and Device-Related Adverse Events
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 (day of procedure)Population: Analysis population includes subjects who had completed the local anesthesia procedure (iontophoresis) and in which a TDS tube delivery device was attempted.
Device Success is defined as the successful delivery of the tympanostomy tube (TT) across the tympanic membrane (TM) using the Tube Delivery System(TDS). Device Success will be evaluated on a per device basis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=128 devices
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Device Success
|
114 devices
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 (day of procedure)Procedure Success is defined as the successful placement of any tympanostomy tube in all enrolled ears in a given subject. Procedure Success is determined on a per subject basis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=70 Participants
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Procedure Success
|
63 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 (day of procedure)Procedure Tolerability is defined as the proportion of subjects reporting the procedure as tolerable, where tolerable is defined as a score of 0 through 3, using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale.The Wong-Baker FACES pain scoring system is a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 means 'no hurt', 1 = 'hurts a little bit', 2 = 'hurts little more', 3 = 'hurts even more', 4 = 'hurts whole lot' and 5 = 'hurts worst'. Procedure Tolerability will be determined on a per patient basis, with the patient's score being the average of the scores for the left and right ear if both ears are successfully treated with the Tube Delivery System. "Tolerability" was defined as an average post-procedure pain score (of treated ears) \<= "3"
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=64 Participants
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Procedure Tolerability
|
59 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeks post procedurePopulation: Only 62 of the initial 70 subjects achieved procedure success, and were present for 2 week follow-up assessment with Tula tube in situ, such that tube retention could be measured.
Tube retention is the presence of a tympanostomy tube placed successfully by the Tula TDS device across the tympanic membrane at the two-week follow-up visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=112 ears
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Tube Retention
|
111 ears
|
Adverse Events
Tube Placement Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tube Placement Group
n=70 participants at risk
Tube Delivery System (Tula): Placement of tympanostomy tube by the Acclarent tympanostomy tube delivery system under local anesthesia in an office/clinic setting
|
|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
occluded tube
|
2.9%
2/70 • Number of events 2 • procedure through 2 weeks post-procedure
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
otalgia
|
1.4%
1/70 • Number of events 1 • procedure through 2 weeks post-procedure
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60