Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety of Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation of Acupuncture Points (NESAP) in Infants (NCT NCT01495286)
NCT ID: NCT01495286
Last Updated: 2012-11-19
Results Overview
Changes in heart rate will be recorded after an initial baseline heart rate. Heart rate will be taken at baseline, after 5 minutes of NESAP, at 5 minutes after end of heel stick, and upon return to infant's room.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
Duration of the TENS unit treatment and heel stick, an expected average of 20 minutes.
2012-11-19
Participant Flow
Recruitment period started 12/15/11, ended 06/21/12. All recruitment took place in the well mothers and babies (rooming-in) unit at the University of Arkansas Medical Center (UAMS). Parents of infants were contacted in their individual rooms by research staff and parents signed IRB -approved consents if they wanted their infants to participate.
The parents of one infant signed the consent form but then changed their minds before the infant actually participated in the study. This infant was withdrawn from the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety of Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation of Acupuncture Points (NESAP) in Infants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
1 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Duration of the TENS unit treatment and heel stick, an expected average of 20 minutes.Population: We based power analysis on 90% power for detecting that the PIPP score had increased by 4, indicating a significant change. With 30 infants, we had 90% power for detecting whether the pain score (PIPP) had increased significantly when testing with a .05 level, one-sided paired t-test.
Changes in heart rate will be recorded after an initial baseline heart rate. Heart rate will be taken at baseline, after 5 minutes of NESAP, at 5 minutes after end of heel stick, and upon return to infant's room.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate During Treatment With TENS Unit
Baseline heart rate
|
137 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
|
Heart Rate During Treatment With TENS Unit
Heart rate after 5 minutes of NESAP
|
131 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15
|
|
Heart Rate During Treatment With TENS Unit
Heart rate 5 minutes after heelstick
|
133 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15
|
|
Heart Rate During Treatment With TENS Unit
Heart rate after return to room
|
133 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, duration of the TENS unit treatment and heel stick, an expected average of 20 minutes.Population: We based power analysis on 90% power for detecting that the PIPP score had increased by 4, indicating a significant increase in pain level. With 30 infants, we had 90% power to detect a significant increase in PIPP score with a .05 level, one-sided paired t-test.
Changes in oxygen saturation after an initial baseline oxygen saturation. Oxygen saturation will be measured after TENS unit is initiated, for 10 minutes between TENS initiation and heel stick,during heel stick, and for 5 minutes afterwards. Measurements will be taken at baseline, after 5 minutes of NESAP, and at 5 minutes after end of heel stick.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Oxygen Saturation During Treatment With TENS Unit and Routine Heel Stick
Oxygen saturation before NESAP
|
98 percentage of oxygen saturation
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
|
Oxygen Saturation During Treatment With TENS Unit and Routine Heel Stick
Oxygen saturation after 5 minutes of NESAP
|
97 percentage of oxygen saturation
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
|
Oxygen Saturation During Treatment With TENS Unit and Routine Heel Stick
Oxygen saturation 5 minutes after heel stick
|
96 percentage of oxygen saturation
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Duration of the TENS unit treatment and heel stick, an expected average of 20 minutes.Population: We based power analysis on 90% power for detecting that the PIPP score had increased by 4, indicating a significant change. With 30 infants, we had 90% power for detecting whether the pain score (PIPP) had increased significantly when testing with a .05 level, one-sided paired t-test.
Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after initial baseline. Measurements will be taken at baseline, after 5 minutes of NESAP, at 5 minutes after end of heel stick, and upon return to infant's room.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure During TENS Treatment and Heel Stick
Systolic blood pressure before NESAP
|
85 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13
|
|
Blood Pressure During TENS Treatment and Heel Stick
Systolic blood pressure after 5 minutes NESAP
|
84 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 12
|
|
Blood Pressure During TENS Treatment and Heel Stick
Systolic blood pressure after return to room
|
83 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 10
|
|
Blood Pressure During TENS Treatment and Heel Stick
Systolic blood pressure 5 minutes after heel stick
|
84 mm Hg
Standard Deviation 13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pain score given during the heel stick process and for 2 minutes afterwardsPopulation: We based power analysis on 90% power for detecting that the PIPP score had increased by 4, indicating a significant change. With 30 infants, we had 90% power for detecting whether the pain score (PIPP) had increased significantly when testing with a .05 level, one-sided paired t-test.
Pain scores were measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). The PIPP is a composite pain tool that measures pain based on behavioral and physiologic parameters and adjusts for gestational age. Differences in pain scores were recorded throughout the heel stick process, using a baseline score as reference. Mean pain scores were calculated before NESAP (baseline), after the TENS unit was turned on, after ten minutes of NESAP but before heel stick, during heel cleaning, during the initial heel stick, during heel squeeze, and during recovery. For term infants, the range of PIPP scores is on a scale of 0 for no pain to 18 for severe pain. A score of 6 indicate mild pain, and a score of 11 -12 indicates moderate pain. An increase in PIPP score of 4 or greater from baseline indicates a significant change in pain level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) before NESAP
|
2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) after TENS unit turned on
|
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) after 10 minutes of NESAP
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) during heel cleaning
|
3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) during heel stick
|
8.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.26
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) during heel squeeze
|
8.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
|
Pain During TENS Treatment and Routine Heel Stick
Pain score (PIPP) during recovery
|
4.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post procedure monitoring for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day. Follow up phone calls at one week and again at two weeks if needed.Population: We based power analysis on 90% power for detecting that the PIPP score had increased by 4, indicating a significant change. With 30 infants,we had 90% power for detecting whether the pain score (PIPP) had increased significantly when testing with a .05 level, one sided paired t test
Areas of skin where the Stim Care electrodes are placed will be assessed for redness, tenderness, or any other change in skin condition. Assessment will take place at baseline, after the NESAP procedure, upon discharge from the hospital, and after one week. If there is a problem at one week, there will be additional follow-up at two weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
n=30 Participants
This was a single arm study, a descriptive pilot study to assess the safety of using noninvasive electrical stimulation at acupuncture points (NESAP) as an analgesic during routine heel sticks for newborn screenings. All infants who participated in the study received NESAP starting 10 minutes before the heel stick. The treatment continued throughout the heel stick and for 5 minutes afterwards. The first 6 infants received NESAP with an Empi Select transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit at 1.0 mA, 2 Hz. THe second 6 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 2.0 mA, 10 Hz. The last 18 infants received TENS unit stimulation at 3.5 mA, 10 Hz.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin Assessment
Baseline assessment for skin irritation
|
0 participants
|
|
Skin Assessment
Skin irritation upon discharge
|
0 participants
|
|
Skin Assessment
Skin irritation after one week
|
0 participants
|
|
Skin Assessment
Skin irritation after NESAP
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Noninvasive Electrical Stimulation Acupuncture Points (NESAP)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Anita Mitchell PhD, coinvestigator
University of Arkansas
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place