Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of Cognitive Remediation in a Supported Education Setting (NCT NCT01492439)

NCT ID: NCT01492439

Last Updated: 2014-06-11

Results Overview

During the study period, course instructors provided information as to whether participants had completed or withdrawn from academic semester 1 and 2. This data was used to determine whether completion of academic semesters might be explained by attending cognitive remediation alongside supported education. At the end of the each semester, course instructors notified the research team as to whether participants had completed or not completed the academic semester. The unit of measure, 'course completed' refers to the completion of the required number of courses in that academic semester to progress through to the next semester.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

37 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

The end of the semester 1 (3 months following baseline) and semester 2 (6 months following baseline)

Results posted on

2014-06-11

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a week for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
19
18
Overall Study
Post-intervention
18
13
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
9
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a week for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
Overall Study
Withdrew from RTE
4
9

Baseline Characteristics

Effectiveness of Cognitive Remediation in a Supported Education Setting

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=19 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
Total
n=37 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian East
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian South
4 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Canadian
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=5 Participants
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=7 Participants
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Caribbean
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Background
2 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White European Origin
7 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
12 participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
19 participants
n=5 Participants
18 participants
n=7 Participants
37 participants
n=5 Participants
English as a second language
Yes
5 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
12 participants
n=5 Participants
English as a second language
No
14 participants
n=5 Participants
11 participants
n=7 Participants
25 participants
n=5 Participants
Self assessed level of competency in English
Beginner
2 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Self assessed level of competency in English
Intermediate
9 participants
n=5 Participants
15 participants
n=7 Participants
24 participants
n=5 Participants
Self assessed level of competency in English
Advanced
8 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
11 participants
n=5 Participants
Primary diagnosis
Schizophrenia
11 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
21 participants
n=5 Participants
Primary diagnosis
Schizoaffective
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Primary diagnosis
Bipolar
5 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
7 participants
n=5 Participants
Primary diagnosis
Psychosis NOS (Not otherwise specified)
2 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
Hospitalized as a result of diagnosis
Yes
15 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
24 participants
n=5 Participants
Hospitalized as a result of diagnosis
No
4 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
13 participants
n=5 Participants
Housing
Own/rent apartment or house
5 participants
n=5 Participants
6 participants
n=7 Participants
11 participants
n=5 Participants
Housing
Supported housing e.g. boarding home
3 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
7 participants
n=5 Participants
Housing
Live with family
10 participants
n=5 Participants
6 participants
n=7 Participants
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Housing
Shelter or other temporary residence
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Years of education
11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=7 Participants
12.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=5 Participants
Years since diagnosis
6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
7.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=7 Participants
6.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=5 Participants
Years since last hospitalization
3.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=5 Participants
1.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=7 Participants
2.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=5 Participants
Hours/week spent
Competitive Employment
1.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=5 Participants
3.0 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=7 Participants
2.4 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=5 Participants
Hours/week spent
Student
19.1 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=5 Participants
19.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=7 Participants
19.4 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
Hours/week spent
Volunteer
0.9 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
1.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=7 Participants
1.3 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=5 Participants
Hours/week spent
Total hours engaged in meaningful activity
21.8 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=5 Participants
24.5 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=7 Participants
23.1 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=5 Participants
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
Positive
13.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43 • n=5 Participants
13.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95 • n=7 Participants
13.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.30 • n=5 Participants
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
Negative
13.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=5 Participants
14.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95 • n=7 Participants
13.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.48 • n=5 Participants
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
General psychopathology
27.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87 • n=5 Participants
28.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89 • n=7 Participants
27.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.35 • n=5 Participants
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score
19.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.63 • n=5 Participants
17.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.70 • n=7 Participants
18.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Trial 1
4.47 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35 • n=5 Participants
4.50 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=7 Participants
4.49 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.10 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Total free recall (trials 1-4)
23.47 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.13 • n=5 Participants
23.50 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28 • n=7 Participants
23.49 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.69 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Long delay free recall
6.00 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.70 • n=5 Participants
5.61 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46 • n=7 Participants
5.81 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the Trail Making Test Part A
49.00 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.48 • n=5 Participants
39.33 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.96 • n=7 Participants
44.30 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.10 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Forward sequence
9.58 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52 • n=5 Participants
10.61 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.30 • n=7 Participants
10.08 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Backward sequence
5.18 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22 • n=5 Participants
6.17 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=7 Participants
5.78 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.97 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Total
14.74 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.24 • n=5 Participants
16.78 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08 • n=7 Participants
15.73 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.81 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the Trail Making Test Part B
98.68 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.58 • n=5 Participants
92.83 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.93 • n=7 Participants
95.84 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.33 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
% perseverative errors
19.79 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.23 • n=5 Participants
18.94 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54 • n=7 Participants
19.38 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
% conceptual level of responses
41.95 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.20 • n=5 Participants
52.94 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.74 • n=7 Participants
47.30 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.51 • n=5 Participants
Performance on The Digit Vigilance Test
8.42 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59 • n=5 Participants
6.72 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.79 • n=7 Participants
7.59 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77 • n=5 Participants
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
36.37 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98 • n=5 Participants
40.55 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82 • n=7 Participants
38.41 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The end of the semester 1 (3 months following baseline) and semester 2 (6 months following baseline)

During the study period, course instructors provided information as to whether participants had completed or withdrawn from academic semester 1 and 2. This data was used to determine whether completion of academic semesters might be explained by attending cognitive remediation alongside supported education. At the end of the each semester, course instructors notified the research team as to whether participants had completed or not completed the academic semester. The unit of measure, 'course completed' refers to the completion of the required number of courses in that academic semester to progress through to the next semester.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=19 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
Completion of Academic Semesters
Semester 1
1.95 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.29
1.67 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.48
Completion of Academic Semesters
Semester 2
1.89 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.375
1.67 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.485

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following baseline

Symptoms of psychosis will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The 30 item scale is comprised of 3 subscales measuring positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms. Each item is scored using 7 anchoring criteria; 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. Scores for the positive scale range from 7-49, the negative scale from 7-49, and general psychopathology 16-112, with total summed scores ranging from 30-210. 95\>high, 75-95 medium and \<75 low symptomology.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
Positive scale
13.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.32
13.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
Negative scale
12.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.50
14.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.25
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
General psychopathology scale
27.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.43
29.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline

The Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale measures self esteem. This is a ten item, four point Likert scale with scores ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores can range from 0-30. Total sum scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; with scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score at 3 Months
21.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.75
15.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.97

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

Symptoms of psychosis will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The 30 item scale is comprised of 3 subscales measuring positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms. Each item is scored using 7 anchoring criteria; 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. Scores for the positive scale range from 7-49, the negative scale from 7-49, and general psychopathology 16-112, with total summed scores ranging from 30-210. 95\>high, 75-95 medium and \<75 low symptomology.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
Positive scale
14.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
13.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
Negative scale
11.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
17.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
General psychopathology scale
26.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.68
28.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

The Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale measures self esteem. This is a ten item, four point Likert scale with scores ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores can range from 0-30. Total sum scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; with scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score at 6 Months
21.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.31
16.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline Assessment

Verbal learning and memory will be assessed with the California Verbal Learning Test. A 9 word list is read to the participant (List A). Participants are asked to immediately free recall List A over 4 trials, then recall after a distractor task (short delay), then after a long delay.In the cued recall section, participants are asked to recall by category. In the long delay yes/no recognition, participants are asked to recall List A items out of a 27 word list. Higher repetitions and intrusions reveal greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Trial 1
5.83 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.42
5.23 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.54
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Total free recall (Trials 1-4)
28.28 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.20
26.08 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.03
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Long delay free recall
7.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.26
6.92 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.12

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

Verbal learning and memory will be assessed with the California Verbal Learning Test. A 9 word list is read to the participant (List A). Participants are asked to immediately free recall List A over 4 trials, then recall after a distractor task (short delay), then after a long delay.In the cued recall section, participants are asked to recall by category. In the long delay yes/no recognition, participants are asked to recall List A items out of a 27 word list. Higher repetitions and intrusions reveal greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Trial 1
6.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.69
5.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.12
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Total free recall (Trials 1-4)
28.60 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.60
26.44 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.40
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Long delay free recall
7.40 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.64
7.44 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 0.53

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

The Trail Making Test Part A is a test involving using lines to connect numbers, it will be used to assess scanning ability and psychomotor speed. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Trail Making Test Part A at 3 Months
33.89 Seconds
Standard Deviation 16.73
27.08 Seconds
Standard Deviation 6.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

The Trail Making Test Part A is a test involving using lines to connect numbers, it will be used to assess scanning ability and psychomotor speed. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Trail Making Test Part A at 6 Months
33.20 Seconds
Standard Deviation 16.21
31.00 Seconds
Standard Deviation 8.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

Short term memory will be evaluated with the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. Participants are asked to recall a sequence of numbers, starting with 2 and increasing to a sequence of 9 numbers. If the participant repeats the sequence correctly they score a one, if incorrect then score a zero. There are two lists, one to be repeated forwards and the other backwards. The total score is a sum of sequences recalled correctly.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Forward
9.05 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.09
9.07 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.32
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Backward
5.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.20
5.23 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.36
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Total
14.28 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 3.75
14.31 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

Short term memory will be evaluated with the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. Participants are asked to recall a sequence of numbers, starting with 2 and increasing to a sequence of 9 numbers. If the participant repeats the sequence correctly they score a one, if incorrect then score a zero. There are two lists, one to be repeated forwards and the other backwards. The total score is a sum of sequences recalled correctly.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Forward
9.73 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.25
9.67 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.45
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Backward
6.60 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.50
5.78 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.99
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Total
16.33 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.32
15.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

The Trail Making Test Part B assesses executive function. Trail Making Part B is similar to Part A but is a more challenging task because it requires subjects to connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles by alternating between the 2 sequences. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Trail Making Test Part B at 3 Months
104.11 Seconds
Standard Deviation 73.32
81.31 Seconds
Standard Deviation 27.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

The Trail Making Test Part B assesses executive function. Trail Making Part B is similar to Part A but is a more challenging task because it requires subjects to connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles by alternating between the 2 sequences. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Trail Making Part B at 6 Months
88.58 Seconds
Standard Deviation 66.98
70.22 Seconds
Standard Deviation 24.63

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

The WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
% perseverative errors
19.56 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 16.39
14.85 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 8.93
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
% conceptual level of responses
50.67 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 26.61
60.31 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 22.24

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

The Wcst is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
40.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 13.32
44.38 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 9.39

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessment

The WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
% perseverative errors
21.27 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 14.32
16.00 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 10.39
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
% conceptual level of responses
49.67 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 26.18
53.78 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 33.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessment

The WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
39.87 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 12.36
41.33 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 15.12

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessment

The Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Vigilance Test at 3 Months
8.33 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 8.70
10.54 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 8.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months following baseline assessment

The Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Vigilance Test at 3 Months
446.11 Seconds
Standard Deviation 111.97
366.61 Seconds
Standard Deviation 43.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessment

The Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Vigilance Test at 6 Months
5.60 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 3.70
5.22 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 5.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessment

The Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
The Digit Vigilance Test at 6 Months
409.93 Seconds
Standard Deviation 89.16
433.33 Seconds
Standard Deviation 74.2

Adverse Events

Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Supported Education Only

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Sean A. Kidd

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Phone: 416-535-8501

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place