Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of Cognitive Remediation in a Supported Education Setting (NCT NCT01492439)
NCT ID: NCT01492439
Last Updated: 2014-06-11
Results Overview
During the study period, course instructors provided information as to whether participants had completed or withdrawn from academic semester 1 and 2. This data was used to determine whether completion of academic semesters might be explained by attending cognitive remediation alongside supported education. At the end of the each semester, course instructors notified the research team as to whether participants had completed or not completed the academic semester. The unit of measure, 'course completed' refers to the completion of the required number of courses in that academic semester to progress through to the next semester.
COMPLETED
NA
37 participants
The end of the semester 1 (3 months following baseline) and semester 2 (6 months following baseline)
2014-06-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a week for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Post-intervention
|
18
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a week for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrew from RTE
|
4
|
9
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effectiveness of Cognitive Remediation in a Supported Education Setting
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=19 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
Total
n=37 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian East
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian South
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Canadian
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=5 Participants
|
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=7 Participants
|
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Caribbean
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Background
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White European Origin
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
English as a second language
Yes
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
English as a second language
No
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self assessed level of competency in English
Beginner
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self assessed level of competency in English
Intermediate
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Self assessed level of competency in English
Advanced
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary diagnosis
Schizophrenia
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary diagnosis
Schizoaffective
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary diagnosis
Bipolar
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Primary diagnosis
Psychosis NOS (Not otherwise specified)
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hospitalized as a result of diagnosis
Yes
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hospitalized as a result of diagnosis
No
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Housing
Own/rent apartment or house
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Housing
Supported housing e.g. boarding home
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Housing
Live with family
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Housing
Shelter or other temporary residence
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years of education
|
11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
13.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=7 Participants
|
12.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Years since diagnosis
|
6.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
|
7.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=7 Participants
|
6.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Years since last hospitalization
|
3.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=5 Participants
|
1.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=7 Participants
|
2.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours/week spent
Competitive Employment
|
1.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=5 Participants
|
3.0 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=7 Participants
|
2.4 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours/week spent
Student
|
19.1 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=5 Participants
|
19.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=7 Participants
|
19.4 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours/week spent
Volunteer
|
0.9 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
|
1.7 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=7 Participants
|
1.3 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Hours/week spent
Total hours engaged in meaningful activity
|
21.8 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=5 Participants
|
24.5 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=7 Participants
|
23.1 hours per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
Positive
|
13.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43 • n=5 Participants
|
13.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95 • n=7 Participants
|
13.32 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
Negative
|
13.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03 • n=5 Participants
|
14.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95 • n=7 Participants
|
13.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.48 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score
General psychopathology
|
27.21 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.87 • n=5 Participants
|
28.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89 • n=7 Participants
|
27.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.35 • n=5 Participants
|
|
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score
|
19.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.63 • n=5 Participants
|
17.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.70 • n=7 Participants
|
18.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Trial 1
|
4.47 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35 • n=5 Participants
|
4.50 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=7 Participants
|
4.49 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Total free recall (trials 1-4)
|
23.47 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.13 • n=5 Participants
|
23.50 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28 • n=7 Participants
|
23.49 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.69 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the California Verbal Learning Test
Long delay free recall
|
6.00 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.70 • n=5 Participants
|
5.61 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46 • n=7 Participants
|
5.81 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the Trail Making Test Part A
|
49.00 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.48 • n=5 Participants
|
39.33 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.96 • n=7 Participants
|
44.30 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.10 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Forward sequence
|
9.58 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52 • n=5 Participants
|
10.61 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.30 • n=7 Participants
|
10.08 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Backward sequence
|
5.18 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22 • n=5 Participants
|
6.17 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=7 Participants
|
5.78 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.97 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -III
Total
|
14.74 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.24 • n=5 Participants
|
16.78 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08 • n=7 Participants
|
15.73 Correct responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.81 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the Trail Making Test Part B
|
98.68 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.58 • n=5 Participants
|
92.83 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.93 • n=7 Participants
|
95.84 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.33 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
% perseverative errors
|
19.79 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.23 • n=5 Participants
|
18.94 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.54 • n=7 Participants
|
19.38 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.46 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
% conceptual level of responses
|
41.95 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.20 • n=5 Participants
|
52.94 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.74 • n=7 Participants
|
47.30 Percentage of responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.51 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on The Digit Vigilance Test
|
8.42 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59 • n=5 Participants
|
6.72 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.79 • n=7 Participants
|
7.59 Incorrect responses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
|
36.37 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98 • n=5 Participants
|
40.55 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82 • n=7 Participants
|
38.41 Total categories
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.26 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The end of the semester 1 (3 months following baseline) and semester 2 (6 months following baseline)During the study period, course instructors provided information as to whether participants had completed or withdrawn from academic semester 1 and 2. This data was used to determine whether completion of academic semesters might be explained by attending cognitive remediation alongside supported education. At the end of the each semester, course instructors notified the research team as to whether participants had completed or not completed the academic semester. The unit of measure, 'course completed' refers to the completion of the required number of courses in that academic semester to progress through to the next semester.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=19 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Completion of Academic Semesters
Semester 1
|
1.95 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
1.67 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
|
Completion of Academic Semesters
Semester 2
|
1.89 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.375
|
1.67 Courses completed
Standard Deviation 0.485
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following baselineSymptoms of psychosis will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The 30 item scale is comprised of 3 subscales measuring positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms. Each item is scored using 7 anchoring criteria; 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. Scores for the positive scale range from 7-49, the negative scale from 7-49, and general psychopathology 16-112, with total summed scores ranging from 30-210. 95\>high, 75-95 medium and \<75 low symptomology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
Positive scale
|
13.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
13.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
|
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
Negative scale
|
12.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.50
|
14.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.25
|
|
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 3 Months
General psychopathology scale
|
27.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.43
|
29.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following BaselineThe Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale measures self esteem. This is a ten item, four point Likert scale with scores ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores can range from 0-30. Total sum scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; with scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score at 3 Months
|
21.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
15.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentSymptoms of psychosis will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. The 30 item scale is comprised of 3 subscales measuring positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms. Each item is scored using 7 anchoring criteria; 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. Scores for the positive scale range from 7-49, the negative scale from 7-49, and general psychopathology 16-112, with total summed scores ranging from 30-210. 95\>high, 75-95 medium and \<75 low symptomology.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
Positive scale
|
14.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
|
13.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
|
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
Negative scale
|
11.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
17.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
|
The Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) Score at 6 Months
General psychopathology scale
|
26.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.68
|
28.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentThe Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale measures self esteem. This is a ten item, four point Likert scale with scores ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Scores can range from 0-30. Total sum scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; with scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Score at 6 Months
|
21.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.31
|
16.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline AssessmentVerbal learning and memory will be assessed with the California Verbal Learning Test. A 9 word list is read to the participant (List A). Participants are asked to immediately free recall List A over 4 trials, then recall after a distractor task (short delay), then after a long delay.In the cued recall section, participants are asked to recall by category. In the long delay yes/no recognition, participants are asked to recall List A items out of a 27 word list. Higher repetitions and intrusions reveal greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Trial 1
|
5.83 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
5.23 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Total free recall (Trials 1-4)
|
28.28 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
26.08 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.03
|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 3 Months
Long delay free recall
|
7.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
6.92 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentVerbal learning and memory will be assessed with the California Verbal Learning Test. A 9 word list is read to the participant (List A). Participants are asked to immediately free recall List A over 4 trials, then recall after a distractor task (short delay), then after a long delay.In the cued recall section, participants are asked to recall by category. In the long delay yes/no recognition, participants are asked to recall List A items out of a 27 word list. Higher repetitions and intrusions reveal greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Trial 1
|
6.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
5.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Total free recall (Trials 1-4)
|
28.60 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.60
|
26.44 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
|
The California Verbal Learning Test at 6 Months
Long delay free recall
|
7.40 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
7.44 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentThe Trail Making Test Part A is a test involving using lines to connect numbers, it will be used to assess scanning ability and psychomotor speed. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Trail Making Test Part A at 3 Months
|
33.89 Seconds
Standard Deviation 16.73
|
27.08 Seconds
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentThe Trail Making Test Part A is a test involving using lines to connect numbers, it will be used to assess scanning ability and psychomotor speed. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Trail Making Test Part A at 6 Months
|
33.20 Seconds
Standard Deviation 16.21
|
31.00 Seconds
Standard Deviation 8.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentShort term memory will be evaluated with the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. Participants are asked to recall a sequence of numbers, starting with 2 and increasing to a sequence of 9 numbers. If the participant repeats the sequence correctly they score a one, if incorrect then score a zero. There are two lists, one to be repeated forwards and the other backwards. The total score is a sum of sequences recalled correctly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Forward
|
9.05 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
9.07 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Backward
|
5.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
5.23 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 3 Months
Total
|
14.28 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 3.75
|
14.31 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentShort term memory will be evaluated with the digit span subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. Participants are asked to recall a sequence of numbers, starting with 2 and increasing to a sequence of 9 numbers. If the participant repeats the sequence correctly they score a one, if incorrect then score a zero. There are two lists, one to be repeated forwards and the other backwards. The total score is a sum of sequences recalled correctly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Forward
|
9.73 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
9.67 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Backward
|
6.60 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
5.78 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
|
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III at 6 Months
Total
|
16.33 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.32
|
15.22 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 4.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentThe Trail Making Test Part B assesses executive function. Trail Making Part B is similar to Part A but is a more challenging task because it requires subjects to connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles by alternating between the 2 sequences. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Trail Making Test Part B at 3 Months
|
104.11 Seconds
Standard Deviation 73.32
|
81.31 Seconds
Standard Deviation 27.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentThe Trail Making Test Part B assesses executive function. Trail Making Part B is similar to Part A but is a more challenging task because it requires subjects to connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles by alternating between the 2 sequences. For this timed test, participants are scored by the number of seconds taken to complete the task, with high scores revealing greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Trail Making Part B at 6 Months
|
88.58 Seconds
Standard Deviation 66.98
|
70.22 Seconds
Standard Deviation 24.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentThe WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
% perseverative errors
|
19.56 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 16.39
|
14.85 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 8.93
|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
% conceptual level of responses
|
50.67 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 26.61
|
60.31 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 22.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentThe Wcst is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test at 3 Months
|
40.00 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 13.32
|
44.38 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 9.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following Baseline assessmentThe WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to the overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
% perseverative errors
|
21.27 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 14.32
|
16.00 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 10.39
|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
% conceptual level of responses
|
49.67 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 26.18
|
53.78 Percentage of responses
Standard Deviation 33.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessmentThe WCST is a commonly used test of executive functioning that measures cognitive flexibility and problem solving skills. The 'number of categories' measures the number of correct responses. The percentage of perseverative errors provides the concentration of perseverative errors in relation to overall test performance. The percentage conceptual level response provides the percentage of consecutive correct responses in runs of 3 or more.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Task at 6 Months
|
39.87 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 12.36
|
41.33 Correct responses
Standard Deviation 15.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following Baseline assessmentThe Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Vigilance Test at 3 Months
|
8.33 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 8.70
|
10.54 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months following baseline assessmentThe Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=18 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=13 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Vigilance Test at 3 Months
|
446.11 Seconds
Standard Deviation 111.97
|
366.61 Seconds
Standard Deviation 43.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessmentThe Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Vigilance Test at 6 Months
|
5.60 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
5.22 Incorrect Responses
Standard Deviation 5.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months following baseline assessmentThe Digit Vigilance test measures sustained attention/vigilance. Participants are asked to cross out either 6s or 9s which appear randomly within 59 rows of 35 single digits. Scores are calculated for Total Time and Total Errors, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
n=15 Participants
Participants in this group received cognitive remediation training in addition to supported education provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. Cognitive remediation had two components: computer-based cognitive exercise sessions held twice a weekly for 10 weeks (approximately 45 minutes) and 10 weekly group discussion sessions (approximately 60 minutes).
|
Supported Education Only
n=9 Participants
Participants in this group received all services and supports provided by the Redirection Through Education program at George Brown College. They did not receive the additional cognitive remediation training provided to those randomized to the experimental arm of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Digit Vigilance Test at 6 Months
|
409.93 Seconds
Standard Deviation 89.16
|
433.33 Seconds
Standard Deviation 74.2
|
Adverse Events
Cognitive Remediation + Supported Education
Supported Education Only
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Sean A. Kidd
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place