Sirolimus/Tacrolimus Combination After HLA Matched Related Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplants

NCT ID: NCT01488253

Last Updated: 2015-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study Design: To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of sirolimus and tacrolimus as a graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, the investigators are going to perform a phase II, multicenter clinical trial after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched, related peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCT) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Total 116 patients will be accrued.

Objective: The primary objective is to evaluate the rates of 100 day Grade II-IV acute GVHD. Secondary objectives include the time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, non-relapse mortality during 100 days after transplant, mucositis severity, all infectious complications including cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, vascular complications (venoocclusive disease of liver; VOD, thrombotic microangiopathy; TMA), disease-free survival, and overall survival at 1 year after transplant.

Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients are between 20 and 60 years of age, have acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and adequate organ function. For available sibling donor, a serologic (or higher resolution) 6/6 Class I HLA-A and B and molecular Class II DRB1 must be matched.

Treatment Description: Conditioning regimens will vary by center and donor will donate peripheral blood stem cells according to local institutional practices. Peripheral blood stem cells will not be manipulated or T-depleted prior to infusion. Tacrolimus will be administered at 0.05 mg/kg/day intravenously by continuous infusion beginning on day -1 with a target serum concentration of 5 to 10 ng/mL. Sirolimus will be administered as a 6 mg oral loading dose on day -1, followed by a 3 mg/day single dose, with a target serum concentration of 3 to 12 ng/mL. Levels will be monitored weekly during hospitalization and then as clinically indicated. Intravenous tacrolimus will be converted to an oral equivalent dose prior to discharge and both immunosuppressives will be tapered beginning at day +100 after transplantation and eliminated by day +180 when clinically feasible.

Accrual Period: The estimated accrual period is three years. Patients will be followed for 100 days post transplantation for evaluation of the primary endpoint, with additional follow-up to two years after transplantation for evaluation of secondary endpoints.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic HSCT. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate has been the standard GVHD prophylactic regimen for the past 20 years. However, the incidence of acute GVHD remains high, with reported cumulative incidence of grade II-IV up to 60%. Serious acute GVHD or chronic GVHD has detrimental consequences in patients including death, disability, infections, or prolonged hospitalization.

Sirolimus is the first available inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). And sirolimus binds uniquely to FK-binding protein (FKBP12) and forms a complex with mTOR. This complex inhibits several biochemical pathways, resulting in a reduction in DNA transcription, DNA translation, protein synthesis, and cell cycling, ultimately leading to T-cell immunosuppression. Sirolimus has been used alone and in combination with calcineurin inhibitors for prevention of allograft rejection after solid organ transplantation. In the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the combination of sirolimus and tacrolimus has also resulted in a low incidence of acute GVHD and reduced transplant-related toxicity.

In addition, the investigators demonstrated previously that the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus is effective as a GVHD prophylaxis and well tolerated in cases of high risk transplantation using mismatched related or unrelated donor.

As discussed above, sirolimus has emerged as one of the most promising immunosuppressive agents in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, the benefit of GVHD prophylaxis regimens including sirolimus has not been confirmed consistently and there is controversy that the incorporation of sirolimus into GVHD prophylaxis results in improved survival.

Efficacy measures: Patients will be followed for 100 days post transplantation for evaluation of the primary endpoint (the incidence and severity of acute GVHD) and clinical data will be collected at 100 day after HSCT using case report form. And patients will be recommended additional follow-up to one year after HSCT for evaluation of secondary endpoints or parameters including clinical outcomes (disease-free survival and overall at 1 year after transplant). The investigators will perform the interim analyses at the time when 31 patients are enrolled during phase 1.

Acute GVHD will be graded according to the consensus grading scale (appendix-1). The broad category of acute GVHD includes:

1. Classic acute GVHD (maculopapular rash, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, profuse diarrhea, illus, or cholestatic hepatitis) occurring within 100 days after transplantation (without diagnostic or distinctive signs of chronic GVHD)
2. Persistent, recurrent, or late acute GVHD: Features of classic acute GVHD without diagnostic or distinctive manifestations of chronic GVHD occurring beyond 100 days of transplantation (often seen after withdrawal of immune suppression).

Safety: All the safety analyses will be based on safety population. The assessment of safety will be based mainly on the frequency of adverse events and on the number of laboratory values that fall outside of predetermined ranges. Adverse events will be summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any adverse event as well as by severity to study treatment. In addition the summary of grade 3 and 4 will be presented.

During administration of drugs as a GVHD prophylaxis, toxicities related to drugs will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). Patients will also be assessed regularly by physical examination and laboratory tests including CBC, biochemistry including liver function test and chest X-ray.

Statistical Methods: Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed to assess patient baseline characteristics, engraftment, acute GVHD, and non-relapse mortality. Overall survival and relapse-free survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated using a competing risk of 100-day mortality for cumulative incidence rate of grades II-IV acute GVHD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Leukemia in Remission Myelodysplastic Syndromes Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase Leukemia, Myeloid, Accelerated-Phase

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

acute GVHD prevention by sirolimus based regimen

The investigators will evaluated the primary endpoint and secondary endpoints comparing with historical control, that is used tacrolimus/methotrexate as a GVHD prophylaxis after HLA-matched, related PBSCT.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sirolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Sirolimus will be administered as a 6-mg oral loading dose beginning on day -1, followed by 3 mg per day orally in a single morning dose with a target trough level of 5-12 ng/mL. Trough levels will be measured once a week. Sirolimus will be gradually tapered beginning at day +100, and eliminated by day +180, unless the patient required continued treatment for GVHD or experienced toxicity related to drugs.

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus will be administered beginning on day -1 at 0.05 mg/kg intravenously by continuous infusion every 24 hours, with a target serum level of 5 to 10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus dosing is converted to oral capsules prior to discharge. Trough levels will be measured once a week. Tacrolimus will be gradually tapered beginning at day +100, and eliminated by day +180, unless the patient required continued treatment for GVHD or experienced toxicity related to drugs.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sirolimus

Sirolimus will be administered as a 6-mg oral loading dose beginning on day -1, followed by 3 mg per day orally in a single morning dose with a target trough level of 5-12 ng/mL. Trough levels will be measured once a week. Sirolimus will be gradually tapered beginning at day +100, and eliminated by day +180, unless the patient required continued treatment for GVHD or experienced toxicity related to drugs.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus will be administered beginning on day -1 at 0.05 mg/kg intravenously by continuous infusion every 24 hours, with a target serum level of 5 to 10 ng/mL. Tacrolimus dosing is converted to oral capsules prior to discharge. Trough levels will be measured once a week. Tacrolimus will be gradually tapered beginning at day +100, and eliminated by day +180, unless the patient required continued treatment for GVHD or experienced toxicity related to drugs.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rapamune (sirolimus, rapamycin) Prograf (tacrolimus)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability to provide written informed consent prior to participating to the study
* Patients with acute leukemia in remission, MDS, and CML in chronic \& accelerated phase
* Patients with HLA identical donor, a serologic (or higher resolution) 6/6 Class I HLA-A and B and molecular Class II DRB1 must be matched.
* Patients with an ECOG performance status score \< 2
* Adequate end organ functions as defined by: Total bilirubin \< 1.5 × ULN, AST and ALT \< 2.5 × ULN, Creatinine \< 1.5 × ULN.
* Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days before initiation of study drug.

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)
* Patients with another primary malignancy other than hematologic disease
* Patients with a severe or uncontrolled medical condition (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, chronic renal disease)
* Patients who are ① pregnancy, ② breast feeding, ③ of childbearing potential without a negative pregnancy test prior to baseline and ④ male or female of childbearing potential unwilling to use barrier contraceptive precautious throughout the trial (post menopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential)
* Patients with an ECOG performance status score ≥ 2
* Patients with known positivity for HIV; baseline testing for HIV is not required
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chonbuk National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chonnam National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daegu Catholic University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gachon University Gil Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Inha University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Inje University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Korea University Anam Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pusan National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Severance Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Soonchunhyang University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seong Kyu Park, MD

Director of Clinical Trials Committee

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seong Kyu Park, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Trials Committee of The Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital

Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KSBMT2011-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.