TMC435HPC3001 - An Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study for TMC435 vs Telaprevir in Combination With PegINFα-2a and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Who Were Null or Partial Responders to Prior PegINFα-2a and Ribavirin Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01485991

Last Updated: 2016-04-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

771 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of TMC435 in combination with peginterferon (PegIFN) + ribavirin (RBV) by means of establishing its non- inferiority compared to an approved regimen of telaprevir + PegIFN + RBV in patients who have previously failed PegIFN.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance like flipping a coin), double-blind (neither physician nor patient knows the name of the assigned drug), double-dummy (patients receive both active and inactive pills also called placebo), 2-arm, multicenter Phase III clinical study in adult treatment experienced Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) genotype-1 infected patients who failed to respond during at least 1 previous course of PegINFα-2a/ RBV therapy. The purpose of the trial is to study the efficacy of TMC435 in combination with PegINFα-2a and RBV for 48 weeks of treatment compared to the approved regimen of telaprevir in combination with PegINFα-2a and RBV for 48 weeks of treatment. The study will consist of a screening period (maximum 6 weeks), treatment period (48 weeks) and post-treatment period (until 72 weeks after the start of treatment). For the first 12 weeks one group of patients will take TMC435 and TVR placebo, plus PegINFα-2a and RBV. The other group will take TMC435 placebo and TVR, plus PegINFα-2a and RBV. After 12 weeks, patients in both arms will only take PegINFα-2a and RBV up to week 48. After patients stop taking study medication, they will continue to go to the doctor's office for study visits until a total of 72 weeks after they start study treatment. Patients will be monitored for safety throughout the study. Study assessments at each study visit may include, but are not limited to: blood and urine collection for testing, electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments (a measurement of the electrical activity of your heart), patient questionnaires, and physical examinations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TMC435/PR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMC435

Intervention Type DRUG

TMC435 Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=150, form=capsule, route=oral use. TVR placebo Form=tablet, route=oral use. TMC435 capsule is taken once daily in addition to 2 TVR placebo tablets 3 times a day for 12 weeks, and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks.

TVR/PR

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TVR

Intervention Type DRUG

TVR Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=375, form=tablet, route=oral use. TMC435 placebo Form=capsule, route=oral use. 2 TVR tablets are taken 3 times a day together with 150 mg TMC435 placebo capsule once daily for 12 weeks, in addition to peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TMC435

TMC435 Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=150, form=capsule, route=oral use. TVR placebo Form=tablet, route=oral use. TMC435 capsule is taken once daily in addition to 2 TVR placebo tablets 3 times a day for 12 weeks, and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

TVR

TVR Type=exact number, unit=mg, number=375, form=tablet, route=oral use. TMC435 placebo Form=capsule, route=oral use. 2 TVR tablets are taken 3 times a day together with 150 mg TMC435 placebo capsule once daily for 12 weeks, in addition to peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient must have had a liver biopsy before screening (or between the screening and baseline visit), unless patient cannot undergo such a procedure or has evidence of portal hypertension not associated with cirrhosis. For patients who had a liver biopsy performed more than 2 years prior to screening or without a biopsy (because of a contraindication or portal hypertension), a non-invasive staging assessment needs to be available. Non-invasive staging assessments include FibroScan, MR-Elastography, or FibroTest/FibroSure and must not be older than 6 months prior to screening
* Chronicity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, as confirmed by one or both of the following: presence of anti-HCV antibody and/or HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) at least 6 months prior to the screening visit and/or presence of fibrosis on biopsy
* Genotype 1 HCV infection with plasma HCV RNA of \>10,000 IU/mL (both confirmed at screening)
* Patient must have had at least 1 documented previous course of treatment with PegINFα-2a or PegINFα-2b in combination with ribavirin (RBV) (at least 12 weeks for null responder and 20 weeks for partial responder)

Exclusion Criteria

* Hepatic decompensation (impaired functioning of the liver), as indicated by significant laboratory abnormalities or other active diseases
* Infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or non genotype 1 hepatitis C
* Liver disease not related to hepatitis C infection
* Previous chronic hepatitis C treatment, other than PegIFN and RBV
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen R&D Ireland

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tibotec Pharmaceuticals Limited Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tibotec Pharmaceutical Limited

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Greenslopes, , Australia

Site Status

Kingswood, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville - Vic, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Haine-Saint-Paul, La Louviere, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Ribeirão Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Karlovy Vary, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Alexandroupoli, , Greece

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Fredrikstad, , Norway

Site Status

Nordbyhagen, , Norway

Site Status

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Tromsø, , Norway

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Chorzów, , Poland

Site Status

Kielce, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Mysłowice, , Poland

Site Status

Racibórz, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Santurce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Constanța, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary Israel Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reddy KR, Zeuzem S, Zoulim F, Weiland O, Horban A, Stanciu C, Villamil FG, Andreone P, George J, Dammers E, Fu M, Kurland D, Lenz O, Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan S, Verbinnen T, Scott J, Jessner W. Simeprevir versus telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin in previous null or partial responders with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (ATTAIN): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;15(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71002-3. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25482330 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMC435HPC3001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR100677

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.