Sorafenib VS TACE in HCC Patients With Portal Vein Invasion

NCT ID: NCT01480817

Last Updated: 2016-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators are going to compare the therapeutic effect of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with major branch of portal vein invasion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

TACE is an established therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been shown to significantly improve survival in these patients compared to no treatment. Moreover, TACE can be performed safely and may improve the overall survival of patients with HCC and major branch of portal vein invasion. Sorafenib, already approved for HCC, could lead to significantly improvement in tumor control and survival in patients with advanced stage HCC. So far there are no head to head comparison reports about the efficacy of Sorafenib and TACE. Here the investigators evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib and TACE in advanced HCC with major branch of portal vein invasion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib 400mg po bid

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

Sorafenib 400mg po bid

TACE for HCC with portal vein invasion

Antineoplastic agents are directly injected into the hepatic artery, allowing high intratumoral concentrations of drugs and thereby reducing systemic side effects. The mixture of chemotherapeutic agents and iodized oil is almost completely retained in neoplastic nodules and can remain in HCC tissue for a long time. Subsequent mechanical embolization of the artery feeding the neoplasm causes ischemic damage to the tumor and prolongs the duration of the effects of chemotherapeutic agents.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TACE for HCC with portal vein invasion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The volume of iodized oil ranged from 2 to 12 mL, and the amount of doxorubicin ranged from 10 to 60 mg. Gelatin sponge particles were mixed with mitomycin and contrast material.Cisplatin was infused at the tumor feeder vessels as a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL at a rate of 5-10 mL/min. The total amount of cisplatin used ranged from 50 to 100 mg depending on the patient's body weight and the level of infusion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib 400mg po bid

Intervention Type DRUG

TACE for HCC with portal vein invasion

The volume of iodized oil ranged from 2 to 12 mL, and the amount of doxorubicin ranged from 10 to 60 mg. Gelatin sponge particles were mixed with mitomycin and contrast material.Cisplatin was infused at the tumor feeder vessels as a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL at a rate of 5-10 mL/min. The total amount of cisplatin used ranged from 50 to 100 mg depending on the patient's body weight and the level of infusion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nexavar TACE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 80 \> Age \>= 18 years.
2. Child-Pugh class A (class B could be included when Childs score is 7).
3. Hepatocellular carcinoma with major branch of portal vein invasion on dynamic CT or MRI

* not only newly diagnosed treatment-naive patients,
* but also HCC patients previously treated with other therapies in case of development of major branch of portal vein invasion
4. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements:

* White blood cell counts (WBC) \>= 2,000 /μl, Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1,200/μl
* Hemoglobin \>= 8.0 g/dl
* Platelet count \> 50,000/μl
* Serum creatinine \< 1.7 mg/dl
* Total bilirubin =\< 3.0 mg/dl
* Prothrombin Time (PT)-international normalized ratio (INR) =\< 2.3 or Prothrombin Time (PT)-sec =\< 6 sec
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Child-Pugh score \>= 8.
2. Age \< 18 or \>= 80 years.
3. ECOG Performance Status \>= 3.
4. Recipient of living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation
5. Patients unable to understand the contents of informed consent or refuse to sign the informed consent.
6. Patients with evidence of uncontrolled or severe medical conditions requiring treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jung-Hwan Yoon, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neo-TACE-HAIC for PVTT-HCC
NCT04181931 UNKNOWN NA