Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Evaluation of Belimumab in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) (NCT NCT01480596)
NCT ID: NCT01480596
Last Updated: 2017-02-09
Results Overview
The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-baseline value. The differences in adjusted least square means were presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline QMG Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline QMG Score by Visit.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
40 participants
Baseline and Week 24
2017-02-09
Participant Flow
Participants (par.) with myasthenia gravis (MG) and who were acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibody positive, on current standard of care therapy and continued to exhibit signs of MG were eligible for participation in the study.
The study was conducted in 3 phases: a 4 week screening period, a 24 week Treatment (trt) Period, and a 12 week Follow-up period. A total of 40 par. were enrolled, however 1 par. withdrew due to MG exacerbation on Day 7 prior to the first efficacy assessment; therefore, 39 par. comprise the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo IV
Participants received 250 milliliter (ml) of a normal saline placebo administered as intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
Participants received 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo IV
Participants received 250 milliliter (ml) of a normal saline placebo administered as intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
Participants received 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
MG exacerbation or change in medication
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
The Evaluation of Belimumab in Myasthenia Gravis (MG)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Total
n=39 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.88 • n=5 Participants
|
52.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.32 • n=7 Participants
|
56.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.67 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population includes participants in the Safety Population who has provided any post treatment efficacy assessment.
The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-baseline value. The differences in adjusted least square means were presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline QMG Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline QMG Score by Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=17 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=17 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score at Week 24
|
-2.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.099
|
-4.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.143
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores. Proportions compared using exact analyses stratified by the observed median Baseline score (less than or equal to \[\<=\] median, greater than \[ \>\] median). Exact odds ratio, double the exact one-sided p-value and exact confidence intervals were presented. Participants with missing data were assumed to have a negative response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Improvement by Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 Points From Baseline Through to Week 24 in the QMG Score
|
6 Number of participants
|
11 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores. Proportions compared using exact analyses stratified by the observed median Baseline score (\<=median, \> median). Exact odds ratio, double the exact one-sided p-value and exact confidence interval were presented. Participants with missing data were assumed to have a worsening response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Worsening by >=3 Points in QMG Score From Baseline Through to Week 24
|
4 Number of participants
|
2 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
A sustained response during the treatment phase is when a participant improves by \>=3 points from Baseline at Week 12, and the participant maintains at least a 3 point improvement from Baseline through Week 24. The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores. Odds ratios are calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method stratified by the observed median baseline score (\<= median, \> median). Wald confidence intervals and p-values were presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Sustained Response in the QMG Score
|
5 Number of participants
|
8 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: As per the criteria documented in the Reporting and Analysis Plan these analyses were not conducted since \<50% of subjects met the criteria (i.e. had the event in question).
A sustained response during the treatment phase is when a participant improves by \>=3 points from Baseline at Week 12, and the participant maintains at least a 3 point improvement from Baseline through Week 24. The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. The total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (normal) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at Baseline is the average of the screening and Week 0 Baseline scores.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36Population: ITT Population.
The QMG is a 13 item ordinal scale which measures ocular, bulbar, extremity fatigue and strength, along with respiratory function. Total QMG score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 13 individual QMG questions. Possible scoring on the QMG range from 0 (mild) to 39 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. The QMG score at baseline (BL) is the average of the screening and Week 0 BL scores. Change from BL was calculated by subtracting the BL value from the post-BL value. The differences in adjusted least square means are presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative trt difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. Analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Trt, Visit, BL QMG Score, Trt by Visit and BL QMG Score by Visit. Only follow-up visits are presented but the analysis also includes all trt phase visits. Only those par. available at indicated time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for QMG Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 28, n=16, 14
|
-3.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.839
|
-5.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.889
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for QMG Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 32, n=15, 16
|
-2.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.880
|
-4.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.904
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for QMG Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 36, n=17, 14
|
-2.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.872
|
-4.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.921
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-baseline value. The differences in adjusted least square means are presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline MGC Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline MGC Score by Visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=17 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=17 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale Through to Week 24
|
-3.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.037
|
-3.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.064
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Proportions compared using exact analyses stratified by the observed median baseline score (\<= median, \> median). Exact odds ratios, double the exact one-sided p-values and exact confidence intervals were presented. Participants with missing data were assumed to have a negative response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Improvement by >=3 Points From Baseline Through to Week 24 in the MGC Score
|
10 Number of participants
|
9 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Proportions compared using exact analyses stratified by the observed median baseline score (\<= median, \> median). Exact odds ratios, double the exact one-sided p-values and exact confidence intervals were presented. Participants with missing data were assumed to have a worsening response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Worsening by >=3 Points From Baseline Through to Week 24 in the MGC Score
|
5 Number of participants
|
2 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: ITT Population.
AA sustained response during the treatment phase is when a participant improves by \>=3 points from Baseline at Week 12, and the participant maintains at least a 3 point improvement from Baseline through Week 24. The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Odds ratios are calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method without adjusting for any strata. Wald confidence intervals and p-values were presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Sustained Response in the MGC Score
|
4 Number of participants
|
7 Number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 24Population: As per the criteria documented in the Reporting and Analysis Plan these analyses were not conducted since \<50% of subjects met the criteria (i.e. had the event in question).
A sustained response during the treatment phase is when a participant improves by \>=3 points from Baseline at Week 12, and the participant maintains at least a 3 point improvement from Baseline through Week 24. The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants' last available assessment prior to initiation of study intravenous (IV) infusion.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36Population: ITT Population.
The total MGC score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 10 individual MGC questions. Possible total MGC scores range from 0 (normal) to 50 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participant's last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-BL value. The differences in adjusted least square means are presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline MGC Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline MGC Score by Visit. Only follow-up visits are presented but the analysis also includes all treatment phase visits. Only those participants available at the indicated time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for MGC Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 28, n=16, 14
|
-4.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.856
|
-5.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.905
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for MGC Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 32, n=15, 16
|
-5.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.975
|
-5.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.948
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline for MGC Score at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 36, n=17, 14
|
-4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.970
|
-5.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.052
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 36Population: The Reporting and Analysis Plan pre-specified that these analyses would not be conducted since during a review of blinded data it was identified that the MGFA scale had been inconsistently performed across sites and any statistical analyses would not be interpretable.
Myasthenia Foundation of America-post intervention status assesses whether subjects can be categorized as being in a status of Minimal Manifestation (MM), Pharmacologic Remission (PR) or Complete Remission (CR). Only MM and PR were assessed in this study as CR is not achievable based on the definition.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 36Population: The Reporting and Analysis Plan pre-specified that these analyses would not be conducted since during a review of blinded data it was identified that the MGFA scale had been inconsistently performed across sites and any statistical analyses would not be interpretable.
Myasthenia Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status (PIS) assesses whether subjects can be categorized as being in a status of Minimal Manifestation (MM), Pharmacologic Remission (PR) or Complete Remission (CR). Only MM and PR were assessed in this study as CR is not achievable based on the definition.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 through Week 24Population: The Reporting and Analysis Plan pre-specified that these analyses would not be conducted since during a review of blinded data it was identified that the MGFA scale had been inconsistently performed across sites and any statistical analyses would not be interpretable.
Myasthenia Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status (PIS) assesses whether subjects can be categorized as being in a status of Minimal Manifestation (MM), Pharmacologic Remission (PR) or Complete Remission (CR). Only MM and PR were assessed in this study as CR is not achievable based on the definition.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 through Week 24Population: The Reporting and Analysis Plan pre-specified that these analyses would not be conducted since during a review of blinded data it was identified that the MGFA scale had been inconsistently performed across sites and any statistical analyses would not be interpretable.
Myasthenia Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status (PIS) assesses whether subjects can be categorized as being in a status of Minimal Manifestation (MM), Pharmacologic Remission (PR) or Complete Remission (CR). Only MM and PR were assessed in this study as CR is not achievable based on the definition.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 and Week 36Population: The Reporting and Analysis Plan pre-specified that these analyses would not be conducted since during a review of blinded data it was identified that the MGFA scale had been inconsistently performed across sites and any statistical analyses would not be interpretable.
Myasthenia Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status (PIS) assesses whether subjects can be categorized as being unchanged, improved or worsened.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24Population: ITT Population.
The total MG-ADL score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 8 individual MG-ADL questions. Possible total MG-ADL scores ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participants last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-baseline value. The differences in adjusted least square means are presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline MG-ADL Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline MG-ADL Score by Visit. Only those participants available at the indicated time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 12, n=19, 18
|
-1.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.489
|
-1.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.511
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) at Week 12 and Week 24
Week 24, n=17, 17
|
-2.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.589
|
-2.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.603
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36Population: ITT Population.
The total MG-ADL score was calculated by adding the score of each of the 8 individual MG-ADL questions. Possible total MG-ADL scores range from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). A lower score indicates a better clinical outcome. Baseline is defined as the participant's last available assessment prior to initiation of study IV infusion. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-Baseline value. The differences in adjusted least square means are presented (Belimumab 10 mg/kg minus Placebo). A negative treatment difference indicates benefit relative to placebo. The analysis method was Mixed-Model Repeated Measures adjusted for Treatment, Visit, Baseline MG-ADL Score, Treatment by Visit, and Baseline MG-ADL Score by Visit. Only follow-up visits are presented but the analysis also includes all treatment phase visits. Only those participants available at the indicated time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=21 Participants
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 Participants
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 28, n=16, 14
|
-1.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.522
|
-2.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.546
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 32, n=15, 16
|
-1.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.632
|
-1.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.619
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL) at Week 28, Week 32 and Week 36
Week 36, n=17, 14
|
-1.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.621
|
-1.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.663
|
Adverse Events
Placebo IV
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=22 participants at risk
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 participants at risk
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myasthenia gravis
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic dissection rupture
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo IV
n=22 participants at risk
Participants received 250 ml of a normal saline placebo administered as IV infusion on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV
n=18 participants at risk
Participants received 10 mg/kg of belimumab administered as IV infusion in 250 mL normal saline on Days 0, 14, 28 and then every 28 days through Week 20 of the treatment period. Participants continued with the standard of care therapy throughout the treatment period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.6%
3/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat tightness
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
11.1%
2/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling hot
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Eye disorders
Photopsia
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tooth fracture
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
16.7%
3/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
11.1%
2/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
11.1%
2/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
13.6%
3/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
9.1%
2/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
18.2%
4/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
5.6%
1/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/22 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
16.7%
3/18 • On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs were collected from the date first infusion of investigational product up to the Week 24 visit.
AEs and SAEs are reported for the safety population which is comprised of participants who had at least one infusion of study agent.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER