Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Microemulsion in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Due to Sensitization to Pollen
NCT ID: NCT01478425
Last Updated: 2011-11-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2011-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary objective:
1. To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
Secondary objectives
2. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
3. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
4. To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
5. To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Dr. Pedro Ojeda Clínica de Asma y Alergia doctores Ojeda C/ Oquendo, 23 28006 Madrid, Spain T1.: +34 91 562 32 62 T2.: +34 91 562 67 27 F.: +34 91 562 53 96 e-mail: [email protected]
Objectives
Primary objective
1. To show that a topical microemulsion is superior to a sterilized saline solution to prevent deterioration in the health related quality of life, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
Secondary objectives
2. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, for the prevention of nasal and ocular symptoms in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
3. To explore the effect of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in the utilization of symptomatic medications, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
4. To assess the patient's satisfaction with a topical microemulsion treatment, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, in patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
5. To assess the safety of a topical microemulsion, as compared to a sterilized saline solution, administered to patients with intermittent or persistent allergic rhinitis due to sensitization to birch, olive tree or grass pollen.
Study design:
Randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel, multicentre multinational clinical trial, to show superiority of an active therapy as compared to a control therapy.
Study disease:
Intermittent or persistent Allergic Rhinitis.
Data from the drugs/interventions to be studied:
This is a clinical investigation study of a Class 1 medical device product. This is a prospective study of an active medical device versus a control medical device.
Study population and total number of subjects:
It was considered feasible to recruit 10 patients patients per center, and therefore the study should be conducted in 10 centers. To get treatment balance within each center, a total of 100 patients should be recruited.
In order to participate in the study, eligible candidates must fulfill all the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients of either gender, aged 18 years or older.
2. With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
3. Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
4. Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
5. Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Known asthma of any origin (intrinsic or extrinsic, the latter due to any kind of allergenic trigger).
2. Allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis whose symptoms are exclusively due to the sensitization to other inhaled allergens different from those referred in the inclusion criteria, sensitization to pollens that may interfere with the patient's allergic status during the study period (e.g., plane tree pollen).
3. Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
4. Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
5. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
6. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
7. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
8. Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
9. Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
10. Individuals that, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, are concurrently under treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy or have received this treatment within the last 36 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active
Lipidic Microemulsion
Lipidic Microemulsion
Topical nasal, twice a day
Control
Saline nose-spray device
Saline
Topical Nasal, twice a day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lipidic Microemulsion
Topical nasal, twice a day
Saline
Topical Nasal, twice a day
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. With previous diagnostic of allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis due to sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens. Patients sensitized to other inhaled allergens might be included provided that these other sensitizations are not relevant to the patient's clinical symptoms or they are not exposed to these other allergens.
3. Having suffered from allergic rhinitis symptoms (severe enough to require symptomatic medication usually prescribed for this condition) in previous years, but otherwise free of symptoms at inclusion.
4. Residing during the months from March to July of 2011 in a geographical area in which the exposure to birch, grass or olive tree pollens is relevant (average pollination peaks of 100 grains/m3 of air during the previous specific pollen season).
5. Providing written informed consent to participate in the study.
3. Rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis of allergic characteristics presenting in the spring season but with negative allergy study (skin prick tests (SPT)).
4. Asymptomatic sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens.
5. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens, but having had mild symptoms during the spring of 2010, not requiring the use of symptomatic medication.
6. Sensitization to birch, grass or olive tree pollens but only presenting with asthma symptoms.
7. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial at the time of this study.
8. Co-morbid conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, preclude them from participating in this study.
9. Continuous treatment with antihistamines, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or any other drug that may alter the occurrence and/or severity of allergic symptoms.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Reig Jofre Group
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pedro Ojeda, PhD, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Clínica Ojeda
Morgan Andersson, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lund University Hospital
Julio Delgado, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Ana Navarro, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Area Hospitalaria de Valme
Javier Subiza, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinica Subiza
José María Olaguibel, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Francisco Feo-Brito, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Juan Manuel Igea, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clínica Alergoasma
Alicia Alonso, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Paracelso Clínica Médico Quirúrgica
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
Clinica Ojeda
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Clinica Subiza
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Clinica Alergoasma
Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
Area Hospitalaria de Valme
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
Paracelso Clínica Médico Quirúrgica
Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Lund University Hospital
Lund, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ojeda P, Pique N, Alonso A, Delgado J, Feo F, Igea JM, Navarro A, Olaguibel JM, Subiza J, Nieto C, Andersson M. A topical microemulsion for the prevention of allergic rhinitis symptoms: results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre, multinational clinical trial (Nares study). Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Aug 27;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-32.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RJ-NME-11-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id