Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma (NCT NCT01474239)
NCT ID: NCT01474239
Last Updated: 2016-03-15
Results Overview
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
91 participants
6 months
2016-03-15
Participant Flow
Study included 28-day screening period. Participants were randomized according to a 2:1 ratio to one of the 2 treatment groups. A total of 99 participants were screened, of which 91 were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
Participants received bevacizumab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
Participants received fotemustine 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
59
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
59
|
32
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
Participants received bevacizumab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
Participants received fotemustine 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
37
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
12
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Clinical Disease Progression
|
7
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal for Economic Reason
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Total
n=91 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.40 • n=5 Participants
|
55.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64 • n=7 Participants
|
56.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants with at least one administration of the study drug.
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment
|
62.07 percentage of participants
Interval 48.37 to 74.49
|
73.33 percentage of participants
Interval 54.11 to 87.72
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until death (up to 691 days)Population: ITT population.
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
7.26 months
Interval 5.82 to 9.2
|
8.66 months
Interval 6.34 to 15.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT population.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment
|
26.32 percentage of participants
Interval 15.54 to 39.66
|
10.71 percentage of participants
Interval 2.27 to 28.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)Population: ITT population.
PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
3.38 months
Interval 3.15 to 4.37
|
3.45 months
Interval 1.87 to 3.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment
|
37.93 percentage of participants
Interval 25.51 to 51.63
|
46.67 percentage of participants
Interval 28.34 to 65.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=58 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=30 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment
|
25.86 percentage of participants
Interval 15.26 to 39.04
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 22.66 to 59.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600)Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=58 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=30 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug
|
93.10 percentage of participants
Interval 83.27 to 98.09
|
90.00 percentage of participants
Interval 73.47 to 97.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)Population: ITT population.
Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
RANO Evaluation
|
28.81 percentage of participants
|
9.38 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
MacDonald Evaluation
|
28.81 percentage of participants
|
6.25 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and "n" signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.
EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=58 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=31 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
-50.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
14.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.53
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.64
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.68
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.91
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Screening (n=58,31)
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-7.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.32
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Functioning (Fn): Screening (n=58,31)
|
71.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.65
|
78.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.07
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
10.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.07
|
7.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.76
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
7.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.17
|
8.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.72
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
13.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.17
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
18.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.21
|
13.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.43
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.72
|
6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.78
|
6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.43
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Physical Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Screening (n=58,31)
|
67.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.04
|
73.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.14
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
6.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.01
|
4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.52
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.87
|
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.23
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
14.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.88
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.87
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.05
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-12.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.96
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Role Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
-50.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Screening (n=58,31)
|
73.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.47
|
74.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.41
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
-8.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.62
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.91
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.25
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.52
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
10.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.63
|
-33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.00
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-5.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.65
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Emotional Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Screening (n=58,31)
|
70.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.18
|
79.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.33
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
4.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.49
|
7.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.55
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.67
|
-4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.31
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
10.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.11
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.67
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.44
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.97
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Cognitive Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Screening (n=58,31)
|
72.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.07
|
81.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.24
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.12
|
4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.96
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.07
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.23
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
13.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.32
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-5.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.05
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.96
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-12.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.46
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
-66.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Social Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
-66.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Screening (n=58,31)
|
58.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.40
|
66.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.90
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.17
|
6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.87
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
-4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.39
|
7.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.78
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.11
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.91
|
-12.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.68
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.34
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
10.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.23
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.94
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
QOL: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Screening (n=58,31)
|
31.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.50
|
24.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.05
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
-3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.59
|
-13.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.73
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.50
|
-9.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.48
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-6.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.79
|
-11.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.82
|
-5.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.86
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
9.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.20
|
-11.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.98
|
-11.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.60
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Fatigue: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Screening (n=58,31)
|
2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.30
|
-14.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.25
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-5.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.30
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.21
|
-9.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.20
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-9.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Nausea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Screening (n=58,31)
|
6.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.82
|
14.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.47
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.61
|
-6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.44
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
-10.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.72
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.25
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.31
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.67
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-7.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.84
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-29.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.46
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Pain: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Screening (n=58,31)
|
11.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.12
|
3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
4.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.80
|
-6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.84
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.20
|
4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.60
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-9.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.51
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.03
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.67
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Dyspnea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Screening (n=58,31)
|
18.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.73
|
18.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.51
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.29
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.33
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.04
|
-4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.99
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-9.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 46.09
|
-33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
28.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.00
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.57
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
14.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.22
|
33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
25.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.91
|
33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Insomnia: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Screening (n=58,31)
|
7.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.79
|
5.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.46
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.65
|
-10.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.47
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.61
|
-14.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.23
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-7.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.30
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.60
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-7.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.70
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Appetite loss: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Screening (n=58,31)
|
17.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.36
|
17.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.63
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 8 (n=26,16)
|
3.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.52
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.87
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.52
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.49
|
16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.57
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.06
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.22
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
-33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Constipation: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
-33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.25
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
-6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.69
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-7.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.30
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
-4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.60
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Diarrhea: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Screening (n=58,31)
|
17.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.91
|
25.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.11
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 8 (n=27,16)
|
6.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.21
|
-4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.39
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 16 (n=15,7)
|
2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.26
|
9.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 46.00
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 24 (n=14,1)
|
-4.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.10
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 32 (n=7,2)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.57
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 40 (n=9,1)
|
-3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.06
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 48 (n=4,1)
|
-16.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.25
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 56 (n=4,0)
|
-8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.91
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 64 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Financial Fn: Change at Week 72 (n=1,0)
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation not available as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.
Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (\>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=17 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=12 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period
|
58.82 percentage of participants
|
41.67 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)Population: ITT population. Number of participants analyzed signified participants who were not receiving corticosteroids at screening.
Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=17 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=12 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Corticosteroid Initiation
|
4.49 months
Interval 1.87 to
The upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was not reached due to higher number (\>40%) of censored participants.
|
5.93 months
Interval 0.3 to
The upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was not reached due to higher number (\>40%) of censored participants.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691)Population: ITT population. Here, the number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome, and "n" signified participants with evaluable data for specified category for each arm, respectively.
Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=52 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=28 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 16: Decreased (n=33,18)
|
36.36 percentage of participants
|
27.78 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Follow-up: Decreased (n=9,3)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 8: Increased (n=52,28)
|
17.31 percentage of participants
|
17.86 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 8: Decreased (n=52,28)
|
23.08 percentage of participants
|
21.43 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 8: No Change (n=52,28)
|
59.62 percentage of participants
|
60.71 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 16: Increased (n=33,18)
|
21.21 percentage of participants
|
22.22 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 16: No Change (n=33,18)
|
42.42 percentage of participants
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 24: Increased (n=21,5)
|
28.57 percentage of participants
|
20.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 24: Decreased (n=21,5)
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
40.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 24: No Change (n=21,5)
|
38.10 percentage of participants
|
40.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 32: Increased (n=14,3)
|
14.29 percentage of participants
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 32: Decreased (n=14,3)
|
42.86 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 32: No Change (n=14,3)
|
42.86 percentage of participants
|
66.67 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 40: Increased (n=10,2)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 40: Decreased (n=10,2)
|
60.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 40: No Change (n=10,2)
|
40.00 percentage of participants
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 48: Increased (n=8,1)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 48: Decreased (n=8,1)
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 48: No Change (n=8,1)
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 56: Increased (n=6,1)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 56: Decreased (n=6,1)
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 56: No Change (n=6,1)
|
66.67 percentage of participants
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 64: Increased (n=3,1)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 64: Decreased (n=3,1)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 64: No Change (n=3,1)
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 72: Increased (n=3,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 72: Decreased (n=3,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 72: No Change (n=3,0)
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 80: Increased (n=1,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 80: Decreased (n=1,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 80: No Change (n=1,0)
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 88: Increased (n=1,0)
|
100.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 88: Decreased (n=1,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Week 88: No Change (n=1,0)
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
NA percentage of participants
Data not available as no participant was evaluable.
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Follow-up: Increased (n=9,3)
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Follow-up: No Change (n=9,3)
|
66.67 percentage of participants
|
66.67 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=37 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=14 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
|
18.92 percentage of participants
|
14.29 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)Population: ITT population. Here, number of participants analyzed signified participants with evaluable data for this outcome.
Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=37 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=14 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
|
NA months
Median was not reached as \<50% of participants had an event of interest.
|
NA months
Median was not reached as \<50% of participants had an event of interest.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)Population: ITT population.
WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration
|
47.46 percentage of participants
|
37.50 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)Population: ITT population.
Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 Participants
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 Participants
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to WHO PS Deterioration
|
8.87 months
Interval 4.17 to
Data could not be estimated as \<50% of participants had an event of interest.
|
NA months
Data could not be estimated as \<50% of participants had an event of interest.
|
Adverse Events
Bevacizumab
Fotemustine
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 participants at risk
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 participants at risk
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Condition aggravated
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Orchitis
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour haemorrhage
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischaemia
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures with secondary generalisation
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
0.00%
0/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Bevacizumab
n=59 participants at risk
Participants received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg via IV infusion every 14 days until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
Fotemustine
n=32 participants at risk
Participants received fotemustine 75 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 (induction phase), followed by a 35-day drug-free interval, and then fotemustine 100 mg/m\^2 every 21 days (maintenance phase) until disease progression was radiographically documented or the onset of toxicity prevented treatment continuation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
15.6%
5/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
9.4%
3/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
25.0%
8/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
43.8%
14/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
12.5%
4/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
22.0%
13/59 • Up to 691 days
|
12.5%
4/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
8.5%
5/59 • Up to 691 days
|
9.4%
3/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal infection
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
9.4%
3/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
12.5%
4/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
6.8%
4/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
6.8%
4/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
3.4%
2/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.5%
5/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures with secondary generalisation
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
0.00%
0/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.7%
1/59 • Up to 691 days
|
6.2%
2/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.1%
3/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
22.0%
13/59 • Up to 691 days
|
3.1%
1/32 • Up to 691 days
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER