Does Tourniquet Use in Total Knee Replacement Improve Fixation

NCT ID: NCT01470482

Last Updated: 2015-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although a tourniquet may reduce bleeding during total knee replacement (TKA), and thereby improve fixation, it might also cause complications. Migration as measured by RadioStereometric Analysis (RSA) can predict future loosening. We will investigate if the use of a tourniquet influences fixation measured with RSA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of a tourniquet during total knee replacement (TKA) is a generally accepted routine at many departments. It is thought to facilitate dissection and reduce peroperative bleeding, but the main argument for its use is that bleeding bone surfaces might impair the fixation of cemented prostheses, because of less cement penetration.

We investigate in a RCT 50 patient with radiostereometric analysis, where 25 is randomized to a tourniquet during the hole operation and 25 are not.

Primary outcome is MTPM, a meassure of migration(loosening) of the kneeprosthesis.

Secondary outcomes are total bleeeding, pain, range of motion and outcome of a patient self assesed knee score (KOOS) Total follow up time 2 years

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No Tourniquet

We compare tourniquet or not in knee surgery

Group Type OTHER

No use of tourniquet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tourniquet is not applied i 25 pts

Tourniquet

We compare tourniquet or not in knee surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tourniquet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Use of tourniquet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No use of tourniquet

Tourniquet is not applied i 25 pts

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tourniquet

Use of tourniquet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

No Tourniquet

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* primary or secondary osteoarthritis without other severe disease (ASA 1-2).

Exclusion Criteria

* were inability to give informed consent,
* rheumatic arthritis,
* malignancy,
* coagulation disorder or medical treatment influencing the coagulation,
* liver disease,
* severe heart disease or bilateral operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Per Aspenberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Per Aspenberg

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Per Aspenberg, MD,PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Linkoeping University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Motala hospital

Motala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VR - 2009-6725).

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Ledin01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.