Breast and Abdominal Related Morbidity of DIEP and SIEA Flaps

NCT ID: NCT01469494

Last Updated: 2018-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

91 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap (DIEP) is the current standard of care in breast reconstruction. The newer Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery flap (SIEA) is felt to be an improvement as it does not damage the abdominal wall. The SIEA unfortunately has smaller vessels which put the flap at a higher risk of developing flap loss and fat necrosis. The uncertainty regarding the tradeoffs inherent in the choice of procedure has not been resolved. As such the investigators aim to perform a randomized single blinded trial to evaluate the abdominal and breast related morbidity associated with DIEP and SIEA flaps.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A blinded, randomized, prospective clinical trial is being performed involving Manitoban women over 18 years undergoing unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction. Women were originally randomized 50/50 to either the DIEP or SIEA group. Due to only about 60-70% of patients randomized to the SIEA group actually receiving the SIEA procedure, the weight of the randomization has now been changed to 70/30 (SIEA/DIEP) for the remainder of the study (approx. 40/110 recruited patients waiting for their OR). Objective isokinetic abdominal strength testing is being done pre-operatively and 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. A self-administered validated abdominal wall and breast outcome questionnaire (Breast-Q) is also given preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively in . Secondary outcomes measured include: fat necrosis, abdominal wound breakdown, flap loss and seroma rate. Fat necrosis is detected using ultrasonography. Abdominal wound breakdown is measured using calipers. Seroma rates are tabulated and drainage volumes measured. Statistical analyses include a combination of parametric and non-parametric tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction SIEA Flap Breast Reconstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DIEP flap group

The standard of care for the patient population is the DIEP or SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Currently the single operating surgeon in the study will always try to perform a SIEA flap reconstruction. If the anatomy does not allow it he will convert to a DIEP flap. The majority of breast surgeons in North America will generally perform a DIEP flap initially. The proposed study does not alter the standard of care received.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DIEP stands for deep inferior epigastric perforator. This is the name of the main blood vessel that runs through the abdominal tissue that will be used to reconstruct the breast. In DIEP flap reconstruction, only skin, fat, and blood vessels are removed from the lower belly (the abdomen between the waist and hips). No muscle is removed.

SIEA flap group

The standard of care for the patient population is the DIEP or SIEA flap breast reconstruction. Currently the single operating surgeon in the study will always try to perform a SIEA flap reconstruction. If the anatomy does not allow it he will convert to a DIEP flap. The majority of breast surgeons in North America will generally perform a DIEP flap initially. The proposed study does not alter the standard of care received.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SIEA flap breast reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The SIEA flap is very similar to the DIEP flap procedure. Both techniques use the lower abdominal skin and fatty tissue to reconstruct a natural, soft breast following mastectomy.

The main difference between the SIEA flap and the DIEP flap is the artery used to supply blood flow to the new breast. The SIEA blood vessels are found in the fatty tissue just below skin whereas the DIEP blood vessels run below and within the abdominal muscle (making the surgery more technically challenging). While the surgical preparation is slightly different, both procedures spare the abdominal muscle and only use the patient's skin and fat to reconstruct the breast.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIEP flap breast reconstruction

DIEP stands for deep inferior epigastric perforator. This is the name of the main blood vessel that runs through the abdominal tissue that will be used to reconstruct the breast. In DIEP flap reconstruction, only skin, fat, and blood vessels are removed from the lower belly (the abdomen between the waist and hips). No muscle is removed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SIEA flap breast reconstruction

The SIEA flap is very similar to the DIEP flap procedure. Both techniques use the lower abdominal skin and fatty tissue to reconstruct a natural, soft breast following mastectomy.

The main difference between the SIEA flap and the DIEP flap is the artery used to supply blood flow to the new breast. The SIEA blood vessels are found in the fatty tissue just below skin whereas the DIEP blood vessels run below and within the abdominal muscle (making the surgery more technically challenging). While the surgical preparation is slightly different, both procedures spare the abdominal muscle and only use the patient's skin and fat to reconstruct the breast.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* female subject older than 18
* with satisfactory abdominal tissue for DIEP and SIEA flap reconstruction
* fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria

* reconstruction planned using latissimus dorsi flap, gluteal artery perforator flap or tissue expansion
* suffer from neurological back problems
* suffer form inguinal hernias
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Keeping Abreast Charity

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Blair R Peters, BSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manitoba Faculty of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438-1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21042100 (View on PubMed)

Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1142-1153. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f02520.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20885239 (View on PubMed)

Futter CM, Webster MH, Hagen S, Mitchell SL. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2000 Oct;53(7):578-83. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2000.3427.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11000074 (View on PubMed)

Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Lysens R, Boeckx WD, Matton G. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997 Jul;50(5):322-30. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)90540-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9245865 (View on PubMed)

Bonde CT, Lund H, Fridberg M, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Elberg JJ. Abdominal strength after breast reconstruction using a free abdominal flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(5):519-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.07.003. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17399661 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B2011:120

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.