Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cetuximab and Recombinant Interleukin-12 in Treating Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck That is Recurrent, Metastatic, or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery (NCT NCT01468896)
NCT ID: NCT01468896
Last Updated: 2025-07-04
Results Overview
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE1/PHASE2
23 participants
14 days
2025-07-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Cetuximab and Recombinant Interleukin-12 in Treating Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck That is Recurrent, Metastatic, or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase 1)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
Total
n=23 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.5 years
n=5 Participants
|
62 years
n=7 Participants
|
61 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Dose-limiting Toxicity Incidents to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of IL-12, Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (Phase I)
|
2 Dose limiting toxicities
|
0 Dose limiting toxicities
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 monthsThe proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Ninety percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Have Any Response to Treatment (Complete Response or Partial Response), Determined According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Phase II)
|
0 proportion of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to day 50Population: Unable to compare the plasma levels of interferon-gamma between those with versus without an objective response to therapy due to no objective response seen for Phase I or Phase II patients.
Explores graphically how changes in this marker differ between those with versus without an objective response to therapy as well as other potential factors.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 monthsSummarized by simple descriptive summary statistics. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Confirmed Clinical Responses (Phase I)
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of registration to date of death, assessed up to 1 yearThe Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate overall survival distribution.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (Phase II)
|
—
|
10.6 months
Interval 5.3 to 12.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsSummarized by simple descriptive summary statistics. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Are Progression-free (Phase I)
|
.17 proportion of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of progression, assessed up to 1 yearThe Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate time to progression distributions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Disease Progression (Phase II)
|
—
|
4.6 months
Interval 1.8 to 13.3
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Arm II (Phase II)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
General Disorders and administration site conditions
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arterial Injury
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm benign, malignant and unspecified
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
|
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 7
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 7
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 28
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 15
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
52.9%
9/17 • Number of events 17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphatemia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
47.1%
8/17 • Number of events 13
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Edema Face
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Edema Limbs
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Flu Like Symptoms
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions-other
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
100.0%
6/6 • Number of events 9
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatuelence
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Disorder-other
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis oral
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach Pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
100.0%
6/6 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 18
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 11
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 9
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 18
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Weight loss
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Weight gain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial muscle weakness
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Facial nerve disorder
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
58.8%
10/17 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal hemorrhage
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonthorax
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sore throat
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 21
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin Infection
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Esophageal infection
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weakness
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective disorder-other
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Trismus
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hearing impaired
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arterial injury
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intestinal stoma site bleeding
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal and urinary disorders-other
|
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
|
Additional Information
William Carson, MD
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60