Trial Outcomes & Findings for Cetuximab and Recombinant Interleukin-12 in Treating Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck That is Recurrent, Metastatic, or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery (NCT NCT01468896)

NCT ID: NCT01468896

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Results Overview

Recruitment status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

23 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

14 days

Results posted on

2025-07-04

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Overall Study
STARTED
6
17
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
17
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Cetuximab and Recombinant Interleukin-12 in Treating Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck That is Recurrent, Metastatic, or Cannot Be Removed by Surgery

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase 1)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Total
n=23 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
56.5 years
n=5 Participants
62 years
n=7 Participants
61 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 14 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Number of Dose-limiting Toxicity Incidents to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of IL-12, Evaluated Using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (Phase I)
2 Dose limiting toxicities
0 Dose limiting toxicities

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 months

The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Ninety percent confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Proportion of Patients Who Have Any Response to Treatment (Complete Response or Partial Response), Determined According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (Phase II)
0 proportion of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to day 50

Population: Unable to compare the plasma levels of interferon-gamma between those with versus without an objective response to therapy due to no objective response seen for Phase I or Phase II patients.

Explores graphically how changes in this marker differ between those with versus without an objective response to therapy as well as other potential factors.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Summarized by simple descriptive summary statistics. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Number of Confirmed Clinical Responses (Phase I)
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From the date of registration to date of death, assessed up to 1 year

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate overall survival distribution.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Overall Survival (Phase II)
10.6 months
Interval 5.3 to 12.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Summarized by simple descriptive summary statistics. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Proportion of Patients Who Are Progression-free (Phase I)
.17 proportion of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of registration to date of progression, assessed up to 1 year

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate time to progression distributions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 Participants
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Time to Disease Progression (Phase II)
4.6 months
Interval 1.8 to 13.3

Adverse Events

Arm 1 (Phase I)

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm II (Phase II)

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
General disorders
General Disorders and administration site conditions
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arterial Injury
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcemia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm benign, malignant and unspecified
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Arm 1 (Phase I)
n=6 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 (Dose Escalation) on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle, beginning with cycle 2.
Arm II (Phase II)
n=17 participants at risk
Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 of the two week cycle followed by subcutaneous IL-12 at the MTD on days 2 and 5 of the 2 week cycle beginning with cycle 2. No IL-12 is given in the first cycle. IL-12 dosing will begin in cycle 2. The IL-12 dose is 0.3 mcg/kg.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash acneiform
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 7
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 7
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorder
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 28
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 15
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
52.9%
9/17 • Number of events 17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphatemia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycemia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Fatigue
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
47.1%
8/17 • Number of events 13
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Chills
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Fever
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Edema Face
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Edema Limbs
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Flu Like Symptoms
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Malaise
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions-other
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
General disorders
Pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
100.0%
6/6 • Number of events 9
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatuelence
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Disorder-other
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mucositis oral
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach Pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
100.0%
6/6 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 18
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 5
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 11
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 9
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
White blood cell decreased
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 18
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Weight loss
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Weight gain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Nervous system disorders
Facial muscle weakness
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Nervous system disorders
Facial nerve disorder
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
58.8%
10/17 • Number of events 10
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal hemorrhage
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal inflammation
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonthorax
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sore throat
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 8
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
35.3%
6/17 • Number of events 21
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Infections and infestations
Skin Infection
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Infections and infestations
Esophageal infection
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Generalized muscle weakness
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective disorder-other
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Trismus
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hearing impaired
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Eye disorders
Dry eye
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Eye disorders
Eye pain
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arterial injury
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Intestinal stoma site bleeding
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
0.00%
0/17
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal and urinary disorders-other
0.00%
0/6
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1
Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Additional Information

William Carson, MD

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Phone: 614-293-6306

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60