Trial Outcomes & Findings for Neurobehavioral Intervention as a Novel Treatment Approach for Emotion-Regulatory Deficits (NCT NCT01466751)
NCT ID: NCT01466751
Last Updated: 2019-06-20
Results Overview
A standardized set of facial emotions (fear and happy) were presented for a duration of about 1 second in quick succession (a new face every 3-5 seconds). Across each face was written an emotional word ("FEAR" or "HAPPY"), which could be either congruent or incongruent with the facial expression. The participant was instructed to identify the facial emotion as quickly as possible and ignore the overlaid emotion word. The outcome measure of interest was the average speed (across all trials presented) within which an individual could correctly identify the facial emotion as a function of time (pre or post-intervention), treatment arm (control or intervention), facial affect (fear or happy), and congruency of word and facial affect (congruent or incongruent).
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
Baseline, 3-month
2019-06-20
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Neurobehavioral Computerized Tasks
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
Engaging Computerized Tasks
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Neurobehavioral Intervention as a Novel Treatment Approach for Emotion-Regulatory Deficits
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Engaging Computerized Tasks
n=14 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
Neurobehavioral Computerized Tasks
n=14 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
Total
n=28 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=93 Participants
|
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=4 Participants
|
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
14 participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
28 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-monthPopulation: Participants who complete the protocol were included in the analysis.
A standardized set of facial emotions (fear and happy) were presented for a duration of about 1 second in quick succession (a new face every 3-5 seconds). Across each face was written an emotional word ("FEAR" or "HAPPY"), which could be either congruent or incongruent with the facial expression. The participant was instructed to identify the facial emotion as quickly as possible and ignore the overlaid emotion word. The outcome measure of interest was the average speed (across all trials presented) within which an individual could correctly identify the facial emotion as a function of time (pre or post-intervention), treatment arm (control or intervention), facial affect (fear or happy), and congruency of word and facial affect (congruent or incongruent).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Engaging Computerized Tasks
n=12 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
Neurobehavioral Computerized Tasks
n=12 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Congruent Fear
|
814.58 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 158.56
|
872.84 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 178.04
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Incongruent Fear
|
863.80 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 144.65
|
909.89 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 193.45
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Congruent Happy
|
796.54 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 130.62
|
824.36 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 196.77
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Incongruent Happy
|
878.40 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 175.54
|
890.90 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 196.22
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Congruent Fear
|
802.15 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 155.14
|
889.14 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 135.65
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Incongruent Fear
|
848.79 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 142.18
|
937.97 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 151.94
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Congruent Happy
|
764.08 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 130.52
|
868.45 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 131.05
|
|
Reaction Time to Facial Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Incongruent Happy
|
830.06 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 142.29
|
961.49 milliseconds
Standard Deviation 134.32
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 MonthsThe degree of differential BOLD signal change (T2\*-weighted contrast in a defined region of the brain as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging) within each individual, averaged across trials, during facial affect identification (fear or happy) and induction of emotional conflict (when the emotion word "FEAR" or "HAPPY" was either congruent or incongruent with the facial expression). We examined the differential degree of amygdala BOLD signal change as a function of emotion type (fear or happy), congruency (congruent or incongruent), and hemisphere (left or right) at baseline and 3 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Engaging Computerized Tasks
n=14 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
Neurobehavioral Computerized Tasks
n=14 Participants
Participants will log into a personalized website and engage in computerized tasks online.
Computerized Neurobehavioral Intervention: Targeted, computerized interventions completed from the participants' own home on a computer.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Left Amygdala Fear
|
0.21 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.16 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Left Amygdala Happy
|
0.25 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.29 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Right Amygdala Fear
|
0.04 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
0.02 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
Baseline Right Amygdala Happy
|
-0.30 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-0.23 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Left Amygdala Fear
|
0.13 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.38 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Left Amygdala Happy
|
-0.03 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.18 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Right Amygdala Fear
|
0.05 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.21 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Amygdala Blood Oxygenation-level Dependent Response (BOLD) Activation to Face Affect Identification During Emotional Conflict
3 Month Right Amygdala Happy
|
-0.10 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.05 Percentage of BOLD signal change
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
Adverse Events
Engaging Computerized Tasks
Neurobehavioral Computerized Tasks
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place