Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) (NCT NCT01462565)
NCT ID: NCT01462565
Last Updated: 2017-10-16
Results Overview
Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), 2 summary scores (physical component and mental component), and a self-evaluated change in health status. Subscale and summary scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale and summary scores was considered as better health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
16 participants
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)
2017-10-16
Participant Flow
A total of 17 participants were recruited from 23 November 2011 to 16 May 2012, out of which 16 participants entered the treatment phase. Study was conducted across 5 centres in the United States, 1 centre in Canada and 1 centre in the Netherlands.
There was a 4-week run-in period during which 1 participant was assessed to be a screen failure at the Baseline Visit (Visit 2) due to the participant self-titrating their epoprostenol sodium. During the 4-week run-in period, participants received currently marketed epoprostenol sodium.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Participants received new thermo stable 100 milliliter (mL) formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.37 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of epoprostenol sodium during the Run-in period (either currently marketed epoprostenol sodium or the study drug).
Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), 2 summary scores (physical component and mental component), and a self-evaluated change in health status. Subscale and summary scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale and summary scores was considered as better health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Vitality
|
0.781 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1636
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Physical Functioning
|
-1.156 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6593
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Role-Physical
|
-0.765 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.3050
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Role-Emotional
|
0.002 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.1773
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Mental Health
|
0.883 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6063
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Social Functioning
|
1.706 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.1043
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Bodily Pain
|
3.065 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8291
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
General Health
|
-0.606 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6068
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Physical Health Component
|
-0.123 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2876
|
|
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Mental Health Component
|
1.141 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5078
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3).Population: ITT population.
Study-specific questionnaire comprised the pre-defined15 questions which included activities of daily living assessment. Participants rated the question on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 was do not agree and 10 was strongly agree. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Changes from Baseline was assessed for Questions 2 to 12. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q5- ability to participate in social activities
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q9- interested physical activity
|
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q2- ability to perform physical activities
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q3- ability to perform your basic daily activies
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q10- feel physically restricted from participating
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q4- ability to perform activities with your family
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q6- ability to comply with your Flolan treatment
|
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q7- ability to perform new activity(Jogging, walk)
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q8- overall satisfaction
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q11- confident in my ability to do new activity
|
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Q12- treatment regimen constantly weighs on mind
|
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4Population: ITT population.
Dose titration requirement was assessed at the time of discharge. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Units- nanogram per kilogram per minute (ng/kg/min). Baseline was Visit 2 i.e . Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4
|
0.22 ng/kg/min
Standard Deviation 1.169
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to visit 3 (Week 4)Population: ITT population.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect and medically significant and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Only treatment emergent AEs and SAEs were reported in this outcome measure. Specifically, this study reported 2 SAEs, but only 1 was categorized as treatment emergent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)
Any AEs
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)
Any SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visit (Visit 2) to Week 4 (Visit 3)Population: ITT population.
Infusion site reactions were reported during the treatment period. Infusion site was inspected for erythema, excoriation, induration, skin necrosis or signs of local sepsis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period
Erythema
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period
Signs of local sepsis
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period
Other
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4(Visit 3)Population: ITT population.
Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure
|
-0.4 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic blood pressure
|
0.4 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4Population: ITT population.
Summary mean change in heart rate measured in beats per minute (beats/min or BPM). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart Rate
|
-1.7 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)Population: ITT population.
Abnormal clinical chemistry was analyzed as follows: serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) \>= 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) , aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) \>= 3 x ULN , total bilirubin \>= 34.2, creatinine \>= 176.8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)Population: ITT population. Only those participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Values for hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count were analyzed. Participants with abnormal values have been reported. The low and high value concern were as follows: hemoglobin (Males \< 98, \>180.0) (females \<91, \>161.0)grams per litre (g/L); hematocrit (Males \< 32.0, \>54.0) (females \<29.0, \>50.6) fraction (1); platelet count (\< 100, \> 500) gram international units per litre (gI/L).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Platelet count (GI/L): Screening: Low
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Hemoglobin (G/L) : Week 4: high
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Hematocrit (1): Screening: Low
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Hematocrit (1): Baseline: Low
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Hematocrit (1): Week 4: Low
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Hematocrit (1): Follow-up: Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Platelet count (GI/L): Baseline: Low
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Platelet count (GI/L): Week 4: Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
Platelet count (GI/L): Follow up: Low
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)Population: ITT population.
Dipstick method was used to measure blood, glucose and protein. Data was analyzed up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up visit).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4Population: ITT population.
This assessment was a non-encouraged test that measures the distance walked for a duration of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at observation minus value at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) After 4-weeks of Treatment
|
-3.55 meters
Standard Deviation 45.321
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4Population: ITT population.
The BDI was calculated by using a 10-point scale (0 = None, 10 = Maximum) and indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6-minute walk test. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. Change from Baseline = score at observation minus score at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Breathlessness After 6MWD - Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI)
|
0.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.535
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time point were analyzed.
World Health Organization functional class was analyzed as class I, class II, class III and class IV. World Health Organization functional class was analyzed at Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 \[+ or - 7 days\]) and Week 4. The classed were defined as Class I: No symptoms of pulmonary arterial hypertension with exercise or at rest, Class II: No symptoms at rest but uncomfortable and short of breath with normal activity, Class III: May not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting and Class IV: Symptoms at rest and severe symptoms with any activity. Hence the severity increased from class I (better) to Class IV (worse).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Baseline WHO Class I
|
2 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Baseline WHO Class II
|
9 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Baseline WHO Class III
|
4 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Baseline WHO Class IV
|
0 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Week 4 Class I
|
2 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Week 4 Class II
|
10 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Week 4 Class III
|
4 Participants
|
|
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
Week 4 Class IV
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])Population: ITT population. Only those participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed. Data for Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time
Baseline
|
94.3 Percentage of oxygen in blood
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
|
Mean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time
Week 4
|
94.5 Percentage of oxygen in blood
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
|
Mean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time
Follow-up (1 week after Week 4)
|
93.0 Percentage of oxygen in blood
Standard Deviation NA
Data for only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.
Urine samples were collected for urine pregnancy test. Urine samples were collected at up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]). Number of participants with urine pregnancy test positive has been reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=12 Participants
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Urine Pregnancy Test Positive
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
12.5%
2/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haemorrhage
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received new thermo stable 100 mL formulation of epoprostenol sodium via intravenous infusion each day for 4-week treatment period.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
12.5%
2/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
12.5%
2/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Paraesthesia oral
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.5%
2/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.5%
2/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroiditis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
6.2%
1/16 • Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.
ITT population was used for the analysis of AEs and SAEs.
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER