Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor (NCT NCT01459653)
NCT ID: NCT01459653
Last Updated: 2016-01-11
Results Overview
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
COMPLETED
1496 participants
Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.
2016-01-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
EP2006
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1496
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
828
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
668
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
EP2006, Evaluable Sample
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN. Only patients who had no major protocol violations and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data) belong to the evaluable sample and are analyzed.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
886 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
561 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
1042 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
|
395 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
395 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
143 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
116 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
286 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
64 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
145 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
175 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
165.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
72.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Body-Mass Index (BMI)
|
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Bone pain
|
116 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Joint pain
|
78 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Muscle pain
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Headache
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Epistaxis
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
GI bleeding
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Medical history
Skin hemorrhage
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
Hypertension
|
458 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
Anemia
|
138 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
Diabetes Type II
|
122 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
Coronary disease
|
93 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
Allergies
|
90 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Comorbidities
COPD
|
86 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
History of any repeated infection
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
Type of repeated infection (chronic)
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
Type of repeated infection (recurrent, acute)
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
1 infectious episode in past 3 months
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
2 infectious episodes in past 3 months
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of repeated infections
3 or more infectious episodes in past 3 months
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Breast
|
466 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Lung
|
345 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Lymphoma (DLBCL)
|
245 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Ovarian
|
140 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Prostate
|
102 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Multiple myeloma
|
85 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer type
Bladder
|
64 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Breast (stage III, n=466)
|
267 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Breast (stage IV, n=466)
|
194 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lung (stage III, n=345)
|
101 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lung (stage IV, n=345)
|
241 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lymphoma (DLBCL) (stage III, n=245)
|
103 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lymphoma (DLBCL) (stage IV, n=245)
|
135 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Ovarian (stage III, n=140)
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Ovarian (stage IV, n=140)
|
77 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Prostate (stage III, n=102)
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Prostate (stage IV, n=102)
|
95 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Multiple myeloma (stage III, n=85)
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Multiple myeloma (stage IV, n=85)
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Bladder (stage III, n=64)
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Bladder (stage IV, n=64)
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Overall, Stage III
|
610 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Overall, Stage IV
|
806 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Breast (unknown, n=466)
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lung (unknown, n=345)
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Lymphoma (DLBCL) (unknown, n=245)
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Multiple myeloma (unknown, N=85)
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage & type
Overall, unknown
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
None
|
518 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Surgery
|
472 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Chemotherapy
|
460 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Radiation therapy
|
274 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Hormonal therapy
|
198 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Targeted therapy
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Bone marrow transplant
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Other (including CAM)
|
25 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Prior Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
|
196 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior cancer treatments
Prior Chemotherapy, metastatic setting
|
206 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (1)
|
1046 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (2)
|
221 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (3)
|
93 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (4)
|
44 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (5)
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer treatment
Chemotherapy cycle at study entry (6)
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior CIN grade 4 episodes (any)
|
106 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior CIN grade 4 episodes (1)
|
79 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior CIN grade 4 episodes (2)
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior CIN grade 4 episodes (≥3)
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior CIN grade 4 episodes (missing)
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior FN
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Hospitalization for CIN/FN
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Any chemotherapy disturbance due to CIN/FN
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (CSF therapy)
|
55 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (antibiotics)
|
44 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (antiviral)
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (antifungal)
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (corticosteroids)
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior CIN/FN and prior CIN/FN treatments
Prior treatments for CIN/FN (antipyretics)
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Treatment(s) for prior infections
Antibiotic
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Treatment(s) for prior infections
Antifungal
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Treatment(s) for prior infections
GCSF
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Treatment(s) for prior infections
Antiviral
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG Score 0
|
553 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG Score 1
|
652 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG Score 2
|
121 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG Score 3
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG Score 4
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ECOG score at enrollment
ECOG score Missing
|
94 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Respiratory infections
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Neutropenia
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Cancer
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
High use of antibiotics
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Urinary tract infections
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Immunosuppression
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cause(s) of prior repeated infections
Diabetes mellitus
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior clinical events
Bone pain
|
116 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior clinical events
Muscle pain
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior clinical events
Joint pain
|
78 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of prior clinical events
Headache
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Solid tumor (n=1117), Stage III
|
454 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Solid tumor (n=1117), Stage IV
|
655 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Hematological tumor (n=330), Stage III
|
156 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Hematological tumor (n=330), Stage IV
|
151 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Solid tumor (n=1117), Stage unknown
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Cancer stage by tumor type
Hematological tumor (n=330), Stage unknown
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data. Please refer to baseline characteristics tables as well.
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. Chemotherapy regimens were classified for FN risk (\<10% risk, 10-20% risk or \>20% risk) according to the published rates in the EORTC Guidelines under consideration of agent(s) and schedules. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
Low (<10%)
|
154 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
Medium (10-20%)
|
650 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
High (>20%)
|
640 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Chemotherapy Toxicity (%FN Risk)
Missing
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data).
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Surgery
|
100 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Radiotherapy
|
102 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Hormonal therapy
|
85 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Targeted treatment
|
89 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Bone marrow transplant
|
31 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cancer Treatment Type - Ever Received During Study
Other (e.g., CAM)
|
98 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, who had no major protocol violations and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e. ANC or completed CIN/FN data).
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia;
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fever and Infections Ever During the Study
Fever ever during study
|
76 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Fever and Infections Ever During the Study
Infections ever during study
|
231 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: The evaluable sample includes all patients in the safety sample (all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication) who had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)
Objective 1: To describe the cancer patients requiring chemotherapy who, in their treating physician's best clinical judgment, are receiving EP2006 for the primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN in terms of demographics, clinical status, medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions and current status of disease, and prior and concomitant medications. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Bone pain
|
357 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Thrombocytopenia
|
230 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Serum LDH increase
|
222 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Muscle pain
|
210 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Joint pain
|
200 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Serum GGT increase
|
178 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Serum ALP increase
|
168 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Other neurological symptoms
|
102 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Headache
|
100 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Clinical Events Ever During Study (Frequency Threshold: 5%)
Blood uric acid increase
|
88 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Delayed Primary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later with no CIN/FN in prior cycle. True secondary: EP2006 initiated in cycle 2 or later following CIN/FN in prior cycle.
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis
Primary (initiated in cycle1)
|
1046 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis
Secondary (initiated in cycle2 or later)
|
401 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis
Delayed primary
|
245 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis
True secondary
|
156 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by gender
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=561 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=886 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis by Gender
Primary (initiated in cycle1)
|
397 participants
|
649 participants
|
—
|
|
Type of EP2006 Prophylaxis by Gender
Secondary (initiated in cycle2 or later)
|
164 participants
|
237 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by age
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=849 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=598 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Type of EP 2006 Prophylaxis by Age Group
Primary (initiated in cycle1)
|
626 participants
|
420 participants
|
—
|
|
Type of EP 2006 Prophylaxis by Age Group
Secondary, initiated in cycle2 or later
|
223 participants
|
178 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by tumor type
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1117 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=330 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Type of EP 2006 Prophylaxis by Tumor Type
Primary (initiated in cycle1)
|
801 participants
|
245 participants
|
—
|
|
Type of EP 2006 Prophylaxis by Tumor Type
Secondary (initiated in ≥cycle2)
|
316 participants
|
85 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Concomitant Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis
|
175 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Concomitant Antibiotic Prophylaxis
No Concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis
|
1261 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Concomitant Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Missing
|
11 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: All cycles from patients in the evaluable sample
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5986 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (All Cycles)
30 MIU/day
|
3182 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (All Cycles)
48 MIU/day
|
2756 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (All Cycles)
Other
|
48 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at enrollment cycle with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1434 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Enrollment Cycle)
30 MIU/day
|
815 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Enrollment Cycle)
48 MIU/day
|
610 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Enrollment Cycle)
Other
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 1 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1036 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 1)
30 MIU/day
|
593 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 1)
48 MIU/day
|
434 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 1)
Other
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 2. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 2 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1143 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 2)
30 MIU/day
|
627 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 2)
48 MIU/day
|
507 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 2)
Other
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 3. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 3 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1125 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 3)
30 MIU/day
|
597 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 3)
48 MIU/day
|
519 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 3)
Other
|
9 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 4. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 4 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1045 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 4)
30 MIU/day
|
548 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 4)
48 MIU/day
|
490 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 4)
Other
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 5 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=862 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 5)
30 MIU/day
|
431 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 5)
48 MIU/day
|
424 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 5)
Other
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 6. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of participants at cycle 6 with dose data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=775 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 6)
30 MIU/day
|
386 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 6)
48 MIU/day
|
382 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose (Cycle 6)
Other
|
7 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: All cycles treated
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=2272 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=3666 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose by Patient Weight: Cycle Level
30 MIU/day
|
1501 cycles
|
1681 cycles
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose by Patient Weight: Cycle Level
48 MIU/day
|
771 cycles
|
1985 cycles
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4609 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1329 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose by Tumor Type: Cycle Level
30 MIU/day
|
2296 cycles
|
886 cycles
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Dose by Tumor Type: Cycle Level
48 MIU/day
|
2313 cycles
|
443 cycles
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by tumor type
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1117 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=330 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Weight by Tumor Type (Solid Tumor vs. Hematological Tumor)
≤65 kg
|
441 participants
|
135 participants
|
—
|
|
Patient Weight by Tumor Type (Solid Tumor vs. Hematological Tumor)
>65 kg
|
676 participants
|
195 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=546 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=2534 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=2843 cycles
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Dose by Chemotherapy Toxicity: Cycle Level
30 MIU/day
|
357 cycles
|
1375 cycles
|
1441 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Dose by Chemotherapy Toxicity: Cycle Level
48 MIU/day
|
189 cycles
|
1159 cycles
|
1402 cycles
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with day of initiation of study drug
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5930 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: All Cycles
|
3.1 days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 1
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1017 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 1
|
3.4 days
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 2. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 2
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1132 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 2
|
3.1 days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 3. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 3
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1111 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 3
|
3.0 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 4. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 4
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1038 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 4
|
3.0 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 5
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=858 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 5
|
2.9 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 6. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with study drug initiation day at cycle 6
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=774 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle 6
|
3.0 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4614 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1316 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation by Tumor Type (Solid Tumor vs. Hematological Tumor): Cycle Level
|
2.6 days
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
4.8 days
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4700 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1230 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation by Prophylaxis Type: Cycle Level
|
3.2 days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
2.6 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=542 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=2504 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=2869 cycles
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation by Chemotherapy Toxicity: Cycle Level
|
2.3 days
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
3.0 days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
3.3 days
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: All cycles from patients in the evaluable sample with study drug duration
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5942 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Any Cycle
|
5.1 days
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 1
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1025 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 1
|
5.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 2. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 2
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1134 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 2
|
5.1 days
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 3. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 3
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1117 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 3
|
5.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 4. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 4
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1039 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 4
|
5.1 days
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 5. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 5
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=856 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 5
|
5.1 days
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 6. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Cycles of participants in evaluable sample with study drug duration in cycle 6
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=771 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Treatment Duration in Cycle 6
|
5.0 days
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by tumor type with data
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4619 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1323 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Duration by Tumor Type: Cycle Level
|
5.14 days
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
5.03 days
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4703 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1239 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Duration by Prophylaxis Type: Cycle Level
|
5.1 days
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
5.2 days
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=541 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=2513 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=2875 cycles
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Duration by Chemotherapy Toxicity: Cycle Level
|
4.6 days
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
5.0 days
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
5.3 days
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Evaluable sample
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting. The PRS is a quantification of eight individual patient risk factors (EORTC guidelines-2010). CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Age >=65 years
|
41.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Advanced disease*
|
13.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
History of FN
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
No antibiotic prophylaxis
|
87.8 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Poor performance and/or nutritional status
|
13.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Female gender
|
61.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Hb < 12 g/dL
|
39.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN at Baseline
Renal, CV, or liver disease
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Patients with chemotherapy risk 10-20% in evaluable sample
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \* Advanced disease is defined as Stage IV (Stage III or IV if multiple myeloma) AND prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia; Hb: hemoglobin
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=650 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
History of FN
|
2.0 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Renal, CV, or liver disease
|
26.9 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Age >=65 years
|
44.6 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Advanced disease*
|
20.8 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
No antibiotic prophylaxis
|
91.3 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Poor performance and/or nutritional status
|
13.3 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Female gender
|
57.8 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each EORTC-identified Risk Factors for FN in Patients With Chemotherapy Risk 10-20% at Baseline
Hb < 12 g/dL
|
45.9 percentage of patients
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Evaluable sample
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Risk Score (PRS) for All Patients
|
2.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Patients with chemotherapy with 10-20% risk of FN in the evaluable sample by tumor type
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. Patient risk score (PRS) shows the individual patient risk for FN.The PRS is a sum of eight weighted individual patient risk factors for FN and results in a possible score of 0 to 11 (highest risk for FN). The risk factors were assigned weights based on the level of risk specified by guidelines and SC consensus (age \> 65 years: 3.0; advanced disease: 1.5; history of FN: 3.0; No antibiotic prophylaxis: 0.5; poor performance/nutritional status: 1.5; female gender: 0.5; Hb\<12g/dL: 0.5; Renal, CV or liver disease: 0.5). Advanced disease: Stage IV or Stage III + prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting; CV: cardiovascular; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=650 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=568 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=82 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Risk Score (PRS) for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With 10-20% FN Risk by Tumor Type
|
3.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
3.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
3.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. FN: Febrile Neutropenia; EORTC: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=640 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=650 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=154 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Primary prophylaxis: Correctly treated (%)
|
35.0 percentage of participants
|
17.3 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Primary prophylaxis:Over-treated (%)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
6.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Secondary prophylaxis: Correctly treated (%)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Secondary prophylaxis: Under-treated (%)
|
9.3 percentage of participants
|
8.1 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Secondary prophylaxis: Over-treated (%)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
3.5 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Prophylaxis Decision by Chemotherapy-associated FN Risk
Primary prophylaxis: Under-treated (%)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample: total and by tumor type
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The CRS quantifies whether the decision to initiate EP2006 as either primary or secondary prophylaxis is consistent with the EORTC guideline (2010) recommendation based upon the patient's chemotherapy toxicity (\<10%, 10-20% or \>20% risk of FN) and the PRS. There are three possible results: under-treated, correctly treated, over-treated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1444 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1115 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=329 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Chemotherapy Risk Score (CRS) Result by Tumor Type
Under-treated (%)
|
17.3 percentage of patients
|
16.3 percentage of patients
|
21.0 percentage of patients
|
|
Percentage of Patients With Each Chemotherapy Risk Score (CRS) Result by Tumor Type
Correctly or Over-treated (%)
|
82.5 percentage of patients
|
83.7 percentage of patients
|
79.0 percentage of patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Number of cycles with initiation on different days during chemotherapy for evaluable sample. A patient may have initiated EP2006 during chemotherapy on different days for different cycles. The categories therefore are not mutually exclusive on a patient level and the sum of patients may therefore exceed the sample size.
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. \^ 168 cycles in which ZARZIO® was initiated on day 4 or later involved regimens deemed by the Study Steering Committee to be suitable for GCSF initiation any day after chemotherapy (day 1 or later), e.g., etoposide; hence, these patients were re-classified as being within guidelines DLBCL- Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Guidelines refers to EORTC 2010 guidelines
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=795 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=3320 cycles
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=1815 cycles
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Multiple myeloma
|
32 cycles
|
167 cycles
|
37 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Breast
|
178 cycles
|
1410 cycles
|
624 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Lung
|
305 cycles
|
691 cycles
|
225 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Lymphoma (DLBCL)
|
23 cycles
|
386 cycles
|
671 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Ovarian
|
109 cycles
|
332 cycles
|
119 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Prostate
|
26 cycles
|
278 cycles
|
95 cycles
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation Relative to Guidelines by Cancer Type
Bladder
|
122 cycles
|
56 cycles
|
44 cycles
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: The evaluable sample consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data)
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; GIS Score 0 (EP2006 initiated on day 0 of chemotherapy or on day 10 or later); GIS Score 0.50 (EP2006 initiated on days 7-9 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 0.75 (EP2006 initiated on days 4-6 of chemotherapy); GIS Score 1.00 (EP2006 initiated per EORTC guidelines (2010) on days 1-3 after chemotherapy) ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; GIS=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Initiation Score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1423 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
GIS score 0 (%)
|
15.9 Percent of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
GIS score 0.50 (%)
|
11.5 Percent of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
GIS score 0.75 (%)
|
16.6 Percent of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Initiation Score (GIS)
GIS score 1.0 (%)
|
56.0 Percent of participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Patients in the evaluable sample with a GCSF persistence score (GPS).
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GPS grades persistence based on the number of cycles in the line of chemotherapy in which EP2006 was administered, D, relative to the number of cycles in which it should have been continued, C. Thus, the GPS = D/C and ranges from 0 to 1.0 ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; EORTC=European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer; FN=Febrile Neutropenia; GCSF=Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1295 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0
|
123 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.33
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.50
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.60
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.67
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.75
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 0.80
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
GCSF Persistence Score (GPS)
GPS score 1
|
1157 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with GCSF congruence score by tumor type
Objective 3: To determine the extent to which the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN in cancer patients is in congruence with the EORTC best practice guidelines and dosing recommendations, and whether this is associated with better outcomes. The GCS is computed at the patient level as an overall grade of how congruent actual GCSF treatment is to recommended treatment. The GCS is computed as follows and scores range from 0 to 3: GCS = Σ(CRS + mean GIS over all cycles + GPS), with higher scores indicating higher congruence. CRS: Chemotherapy Risk Score (0 or 1 with 1 best); FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS=GCSF Initiation Score (0 to 1 with 1 best); GPS=GCSF persistence score (0 to 1 with 1 best);
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1278 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1015 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=263 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
GCSF Congruence Score (GCS)
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: Number of patients in evaluable sample with initial ANC result
Objective 4: To describe hematological outcomes observed in association with primary and secondary prophylactic use of EP2006 in patients at risk for FN; including break-through episodes of FN.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1283 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at EP2006 Initiation
|
4429.7 Per mm^3
Standard Deviation 4725.8
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 4: To describe hematological outcomes observed in association with primary and secondary prophylactic use of EP2006 in patients at risk for FN; including break-through episodes of FN.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=7792 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Across All Cycles
|
4585.6 Per mm^3
Standard Deviation 3889.8
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 4: To describe hematological outcomes observed in association with primary and secondary prophylactic use of EP2006 in patients at risk for FN; including break-through episodes of FN. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; Chemotherapy disturbance=dose reduction, delay, and/or cancellation; Composite (any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization or CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance) A patient may fall into more than one or none of the categories displayed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
CIN any grade
|
504 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
CIN grade 3/4
|
332 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
CIN grade 4
|
191 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
FN
|
86 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
CIN/FN-related hospitalization
|
88 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance
|
138 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients With CIN/FN Episodes: Patient Level
Composite
|
323 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Number of cycles in evaluable sample
Objective 4: To describe hematological outcomes observed in association with primary and secondary prophylactic use of EP2006 in patients at risk for FN; including break-through episodes of FN. Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia (CIN); Febrile Neutropenia (FN); Chemotherapy disturbance=dose reduction, delay, and/or cancellation; Composite (any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization \[RH\] or CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance \[RCD\])
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=7570 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
CIN any grade (n=7557)
|
1083 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
CIN grade 3/4 (n=7541)
|
602 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
CIN grade 4 (n=7541)
|
294 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
FN (n=7532)
|
105 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
CIN/FN-RH (n=7531)
|
111 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
CIN/FN-RCD (n=6213)
|
174 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
CIN/FN Episodes: Cycle Level
Composite (n=7570)
|
507 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by chemotherapy risk
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by chemotherapy risk group. \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=154 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=650 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=640 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level
CIN grade 4
|
7.8 percentage of participants
|
11.8 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level
FN
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
3.5 percentage of participants
|
8.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Chemotherapy Risk: Patient Level
Composite^
|
16.9 percentage of participants
|
20.9 percentage of participants
|
25.2 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by prophylaxis type
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1046 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=401 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance by EP2006 Prophylaxis Type: Patient Level
|
7.5 Percentage of participants
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by prophylaxis decision (relative to guidelines)
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by prophylaxis decision (relative to guidelines). \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=251 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=817 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=376 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
CIN grade 4
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
6.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
FN
|
5.2 percentage of participants
|
8.0 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
CIN/FN-related hospitalization
|
8.0 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
2.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of CIN/FN-related Hospitalization Outcomes by EP2006 Practice Patterns (Relative to Guidelines): Patient Level
Composite^
|
24.7 percentage of participants
|
26.0 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by study drug dose
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=815 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=610 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of CIN Grade 4 Episodes by EP2006 Dose: Patient Level
|
11.3 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by mean GIS
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes by day (mean GIS over all visits). \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=390 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=308 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=725 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Mean GIS: Patient Level
CIN grade 4
|
17.7 percentage of participants
|
17.5 percentage of participants
|
9.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Mean GIS: Patient Level
Composite^
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
24.7 percentage of participants
|
18.9 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysObjective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes on a cycle level. \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
CIN grade 4
|
3.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
FN
|
1.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
CIN/FN-related hospitalization
|
1.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance
|
2.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes: Cycles Level
Composite^
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by day of study drug initiation. As these are cycle-level analyses and since patients can be in more than one category over the course of the study, the sum of patients of all three categories may exceed the sample size.
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes on a cycle level by day of study drug initiation. \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010). \*Day of EP2006 initiation- Day 0 (during chemotherapy); \*\*Day of EP2006 initiation- Days 1-3 (per guidelines)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=234 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=851 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=473 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Day of Study Drug Initiation: Cycle Level
CIN grade 4
|
3.1 percentage of participants
|
2.8 percentage of participants
|
7.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Day of Study Drug Initiation: Cycle Level
FN
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Day of Study Drug Initiation: Cycle Level
Composite^
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
5.4 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by study drug duration. As these are cycle-level analyses and since patients can be in more than one category over the course of the study, the sum of patients of all three categories may exceed the sample size.
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of outcomes on a cycle level by study drug duration. \^Composite outcome includes CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia;
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=380 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=784 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=419 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Study Drug Duration: Cycle Level
CIN grade 4
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
5.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Study Drug Duration: Cycle Level
FN
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
1.2 percentage of participants
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Study Drug Duration: Cycle Level
CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance
|
2.0 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
4.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes by Study Drug Duration: Cycle Level
Composite^
|
6.0 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
9.3 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Safety population, i.e. all patients who received at least one dose of study drug
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1496 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients by Cause of Death
All cause
|
61 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients by Cause of Death
Cancer-related
|
41 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients by Cause of Death
Non-cancer related
|
14 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients by Cause of Death
Cause of death specified as "unknown"
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Patients by Cause of Death
Cause of death not documented
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by any/no grade 4 CIN/FN
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table shows number of patients that died in each group. CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=221 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1226 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality by Any/no Grade 4 CIN and/or FN
|
10 participants
|
46 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by any or no CIN/FN related chemotherapy disturbance.
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table shows number of patients who died by any or no CIN/FN related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=138 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1309 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality by CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance
|
3 participants
|
53 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by any/no grade 4 CIN or FN with data
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents number of patients that had a cancer-related death by any/no grade 4 CIN or FN CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=221 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1220 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Cancer-related Mortality by Any/no Grade 4 CIN or FN
|
6 participants
|
29 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by any/no CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance with data
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents number of patients who had a cancer-related death by any/no CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=138 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=1303 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Cancer-related Mortality by Any CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance
|
2 participants
|
33 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by prophylaxis type
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents number of patients with any CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance by prophylaxis type. CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1046 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=401 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance by Prophylaxis Type
|
78 participants
|
60 participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample by treatment decision with data
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents number of patients with any CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbances by treatment decision. CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=251 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=817 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
n=376 Participants
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Any CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance by Treatment Decision
|
37 participants
|
72 participants
|
29 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Cycles for patients in evaluable sample with data
Objective 6: To examine the multilevel determinants (patient, center) of hematological outcomes of primary and secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 to better understand the variability in outcomes achieved. Hierarchical modeling was used to test the relationship of patient- and physician/center-level variables and treatment response in terms of ANC. This analysis was conducted at the cycle level using a 1-cycle lag between treatment patterns and outcomes, that is study drug treatment patterns in one cycle predicted the ANC value at the beginning of the next cycle. Log-transformed ANC values were used. Table presents predictors for ANC: GCSF decision, study drug dose, tumor type, patient gender, ECOG, Hb Since log-transformed Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) values were used, Exp(beta) can be interpreted in terms of % change in ANC for each unit change in predictor or for each category relative to the referent (for categorical variables); Hb=Hemoglobin
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4333 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Predictors of Absolute Neutrophil Count
|
1185 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample
Objective 6: To examine the multilevel determinants (patient, center) of hematological outcomes of primary and secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 to better understand the variability in outcomes achieved. Mean and standard error estimated from ANCOVA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=4333 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient/Center-level Covariance Parameter Estimates of Absolute Neutrophil Count
|
1185 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with day of study drug initiation
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery. Table presents number of cycles by day after chemotherapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5930 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 0
|
795 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day1
|
1818 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 2
|
793 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 3
|
541 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 4
|
270 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 5
|
404 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 6
|
400 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 7
|
429 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 8
|
231 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day 9
|
59 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day10
|
49 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
day11
|
36 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Day of Initiation: Cycle Distribution
≥day12
|
105 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: All cycles from patients in the evaluable sample with study drug duration
Objective 2: To describe EP2006 primary or secondary prophylaxis patterns for FN over up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with or without prior, concurrent, or later radiotherapy or surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5942 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
14 days
|
105 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
>=15 days
|
22 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
1 day
|
211 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
2 days
|
339 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
3 days
|
729 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
4 days
|
422 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
5 days
|
2718 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
6 days
|
385 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
7 days
|
682 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
8 days
|
115 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
9 days
|
53 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
10 days
|
120 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
11 days
|
13 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
12 days
|
20 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
|
EP2006 Cycles by Treatment Duration
13 days
|
8 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample
Objective 5: To describe the distribution of chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, and cancellations, and mortality (GCSF-related; FN-related; cancer-related; not related to GCSF, FN, or cancer; all-cause); and estimate the time-to-event for such events over the course of EP2006 treatment. Table presents incidences of different outcomes and composite outcome by chemotherapy risk group. \^Composite endpoint includes any of CIN grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related hospitalization and CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance. CIN: Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN: Febrile Neutropenia; ANC: Absolute Neutrophil count; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Prophylaxis decision mentioned below are relative to EORTC guidelines (2010).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Outcomes
CIN grade 4
|
13.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes
FN
|
5.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes
CIN/FN related Hospitalization
|
6.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes
CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Incidence of Outcomes
Composite^
|
22.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: The evaluable sample consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, had no major protocol violation and have a minimum of enrollment cycle and either one follow-up cycle or study end data with valid outcome data (i.e., ANC or completed CIN/FN data).
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status. A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count; CIN=Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1447 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cohort Identification
EP2006 - Group 1
|
1192 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cohort Identification
EP2006 - Group 2
|
43 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Cohort Identification
Missing
|
212 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. Only patients with data in each group are analyzed for hemoglobin at study start.
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1175 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=43 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: Hemoglobin Study Start
|
12.35 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
11.82 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.86
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. Only patients with data in each group are analyzed for ECOG performance status.
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status. ECOG score is a severity scale from 0 to 5 (highest) to grade toxicity and is defined as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life-threatening, 5=lethal. ECOG is described in more detail by Oken et al, Am J Clin Oncol (CCT) 5:649-655, 1982. FN=Febrile Neutropenia; ECOG: European Cooperative Oncology Group
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1145 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=39 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: ECOG Performance Status
|
0.75 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
0.87 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. Only patients with data in each group are analyzed for cancer stage.
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status. FN=Febrile Neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1192 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=41 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: Cancer Stage
Cancer Stage III
|
511 participants
|
12 participants
|
—
|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: Cancer Stage
Cancer Stage IV
|
681 participants
|
29 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. Only patients with data in each group are analyzed for history of antibiotic use for CIN.
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status. CIN=Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia; FN=Febrile Neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1192 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=41 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: History of Antibiotic Use for CIN
No history for antibiotic use for CIN
|
1190 participants
|
17 participants
|
—
|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: History of Antibiotic Use for CIN
History for antibiotic use for CIN (Yes)
|
2 participants
|
24 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Enrollment cycle. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician.Population: A two-group solution converged and the groups differentiated on key baseline variables. However, the group sizes were too unevenly distributed for further analysis with the "high risk group" comprised of only 3.0% of the evaluable sample. Only patients with data in each group are analyzed for liver, renal and/or cardiovascular disease.
Objective 7: To identify different latent clusters of end-stage cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and being treated with EP2006 for the treatment or primary or secondary prophylaxis of FN using statistical data-mining techniques to profile patients based on medical history, concomitant comorbid conditions, and current clinical status. FN=Febrile Neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1192 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
n=41 Participants
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: Liver, Renal and/or Cardiovascular Disease
No Liver, renal and/or cardiovascular disease
|
931 participants
|
19 participants
|
—
|
|
Characteristics of Clusters: Liver, Renal and/or Cardiovascular Disease
Liver, renal and/or cardiovascular disease (Yes)
|
261 participants
|
22 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Number of cycles in evaluable sample with any grade 4 CIN data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are added as statistical analyses appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5514 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling Grade 4 CIN Episode: Cycle Level
|
294 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. H/o=History of; CI=confidence interval; CIN=chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1323 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling Grade 4 CIN Episode: Patient Level
|
191 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Number of cycles of patients in evaluable sample with FN episode data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=6362 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling FN Episode: Cycle Level
|
105 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with FN episode data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1376 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling FN Episode: Patient Level
|
86 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Number of cycles of patients in evaluable sample with CIN/FN-related hospitalization data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=6928 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling CIN/FN-related Hospitalization: Cycle Level
|
111 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with CIN/FN-related hospitalization data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1387 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling CIN/FN-related Hospitalization: Patient Level
|
88 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Cycles of patients in evaluable sample with CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance with data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score; Chemotherapy disturbance=dose reduction, delay, and/or cancellation
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=3376 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance: Cycle Level
|
174 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with CIN/FN-related chemotherapy disturbance data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FN: febrile neutropenia
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1334 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance: Patient Level (Patient-level Predictors)
|
138 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Cycles of patients from evaluable sample with composite outcome data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=5193 cycles
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Cycle Level
|
507 cycles
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Patients in evaluable sample with composite outcome data
Objective 8: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who responded and those who did not respond to primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Objective 9: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who had chemotherapy dose delays or reductions, surgery delays and cancellations, and radiotherapy delays, dose reductions, or cancellations vs. no such events during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006. Only results with a p-value of \<0.05 are shown in the statistical appendices. CI: confidence interval; CIN: chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FN: febrile neutropenia; GCSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIS: GCSF Initiation Score. H/o repeated infections refers at enrollment; H/o: History of
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1291 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modeling Composite Outcome (Any of CIN Grade 4, FN, CIN/FN-related Hospitalization, CIN/FN-related Chemotherapy Disturbance): Patient Level
|
323 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with data
Objective 10: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who died vs. survived during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006, in all patients and those with break-through FN episodes. Table presents patient-level predictors for all-cause mortality: history of anemia at enrollment, liver/renal/cardiac comorbidity, poor performance (ECOG \>=2) during study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1272 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient-level Predictors for All-cause Mortality
|
1272 participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All cycles. Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 daysPopulation: Evaluable sample with data
Objective 10: To model patient- and center-level variables between patients who died vs. survived during the course of primary or secondary prophylaxis with EP2006 in all patients and those with break-through FN episodes. Table presents patient level predictors for cancer-related mortality: female gender, poor performance (ECOG \>=2) during study. ECOG score is a severity scale from 0 to 5 (highest) to grade toxicity and is defined as follows: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life-threatening, 5=lethal. ECOG is described in more detail by Oken et al, Am J Clin Oncol (CCT) 5:649-655, 1982.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1385 Participants
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Female
Female cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
EP2006: Risk >20%
Cancer patients with chemotherapy toxicity \>20% treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient-level Predictor for Cancer-related Mortality
|
1385 participants
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
EP2006
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1496 participants at risk
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN. Number 1496 refers to the total number of patients who received at least one dose of study medication EP2006.
|
|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.07%
1/1496 • Number of events 1 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvul abscess
|
0.07%
1/1496 • Number of events 1 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.07%
1/1496 • Number of events 1 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.07%
1/1496 • Number of events 1 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
EP2006
n=1496 participants at risk
Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and who are prescribed commercially available filgrastim biosimilar for primary or secondary prophylaxis for FN. Number 1496 refers to the total number of patients who received at least one dose of study medication EP2006.
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
1.6%
24/1496 • Number of events 33 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.80%
12/1496 • Number of events 21 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.60%
9/1496 • Number of events 11 • Patients were evaluated at the enrollment cycle and then re-evaluated at each cycle for a maximum total of 6 cycles; however, the scheduling of these evaluations was left to the discretion of the physician, mean duration of study for 105 days
The occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) not including not-related (S)AEs was sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit during the study. Only Adverse events with a suspected relationship to EP2006 were collected.
|
Additional Information
Andriy Krendyukov, Global Medical Director
Sandoz GmBH
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor is the sole owner of all data, results and any work summarizing the Study to which this agreement refers, and it should be noted that the Investigator agrees to their publication by Sponsor in any scientific or medical journal chosen by Sponsor. It should be noted that the Investigator may not make any communications or publications relating to the Study which forms the basis of this agreement, without the prior written agreement of the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER