Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of DKN-01 in Multiple Myeloma or Advanced Solid Tumors (NCT NCT01457417)
NCT ID: NCT01457417
Last Updated: 2016-09-28
Results Overview
Total Adverse Events (AE), total treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), total Serious Adverse Events (SAE), and total dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for both Parts A and B.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
32 participants
Baseline to study completion (approximately 3 months)
2016-09-28
Participant Flow
Eight sites in the United States participated in the study and 7 of them enrolled patients. The Date of First Enrollment was 16 Jan 2012, and the Date of Last Completed was 06 Dec 2013.
Part A enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed multiple myeloma or advanced solid tumors. A dose escalation procedure was followed. Part B enrolled patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Following screening (up to 28 days prior to first treatment) if entry criterion was met, patients were eligible for enrollment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of DKN-01 in Multiple Myeloma or Advanced Solid Tumors
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=4 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B
n=19 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77 • n=5 Participants
|
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.62 • n=7 Participants
|
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.20 • n=5 Participants
|
68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.96 • n=4 Participants
|
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25 • n=21 Participants
|
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.29 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 participants
n=21 Participants
|
32 participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to study completion (approximately 3 months)Population: Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study.
Total Adverse Events (AE), total treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), total Serious Adverse Events (SAE), and total dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for both Parts A and B.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=4 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=19 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Total Adverse Events (AE)
Total DLTs
|
0 Events
|
0 Events
|
0 Events
|
0 Events
|
0 Events
|
0 Events
|
|
Summary of Total Adverse Events (AE)
Total AEs
|
39 Events
|
58 Events
|
35 Events
|
11 Events
|
87 Events
|
230 Events
|
|
Summary of Total Adverse Events (AE)
Total TEAEs
|
39 Events
|
58 Events
|
35 Events
|
9 Events
|
87 Events
|
228 Events
|
|
Summary of Total Adverse Events (AE)
Total SAEs
|
2 Events
|
7 Events
|
3 Events
|
0 Events
|
11 Events
|
23 Events
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to study completion (approximately 3 months)Population: Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study.
Number of patients who had Adverse Events (AE) including treatment related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE), and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) for both Parts A and B. Severity was coded to NCI CTCAE version 4.02. For maximum severity and relationship, patients were counted only once in the most severe or most related category.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=4 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=19 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum CTCAE - Grade 2 Moderate
|
2 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
6 Patients
|
13 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum CTCAE - Grade 3 Severe
|
0 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
9 Patients
|
14 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum CTCAE - Grade 4 Life Threatening
|
1 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE Grade ≥ 3 assessed as study drug related
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum Relationship - Not Related
|
2 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
8 Patients
|
14 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One TEAE Leading to Study Discontinuation
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One TEAE with Outcome of Death
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
Retracted SAE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
5 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One AE
|
3 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
4 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
16 Patients
|
29 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
SAE related to study drug
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum CTCAE - Grade 1 Mild
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One TEAE
|
3 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
4 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
16 Patients
|
29 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One SAE
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
7 Patients
|
11 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum CTCAE - Grade 5 Death
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
TEAE of Maximum Relationship - Related
|
1 Patients
|
2 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
8 Patients
|
15 Patients
|
|
Summary of Patients With Adverse Events (AE)
At Least One TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal
|
0 Patients
|
1 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
0 Patients
|
3 Patients
|
4 Patients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from the date of signed informed consent to the first date of objectively determined progressive disease or death from any causePopulation: Patients with advanced NSCLC receiving the study drug at 300 mg every 2 weeks in Part B
For Part B only. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. PFS was defined as the time from the date of signed informed consent to the first date of objectively determined progressive disease (Progression is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) and International Multiple Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)) or death from any cause. For patients who were still alive at the time of analysis (ie, data cut-off date) and without evidence of tumor progression, PFS was censored at the date of the most recent objective progression-free observation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=18 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
|
2.2 months
Interval 1.5 to 2.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (first dose, all groups)Population: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study.
Area under the DKN-01 serum concentration-time profile curve during the dosing interval (AUC0-tau) after the first and fourth infusion for both Parts A and B. Cycle 1 Day 1 included once per week (QW) dosing groups and every two weeks (Q2W) dosing groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=18 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve (AUC) of DKN-01
|
1942552.08830 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 780226.768012
|
4381685.27190 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 402701.016054
|
10860453.92050 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2319628.494223
|
18103276.11133 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1250736.327819
|
18398867.35928 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5107540.116369
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 22 (Fourth Dose for QW)Population: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A study.
Area under the DKN-01 serum concentration-time profile curve during the dosing interval (AUC0-tau) after the first and fourth infusion for both Parts A and B. Cycle 1 day 22 included only QW dosing groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration - Time Curve (AUC) of DKN-01
|
5663382.27007 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3919446.471337
|
15815320.60770 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5614032.150398
|
25639949.52467 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4567585.003954
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (first dose, all groups)Population: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study.
Peak DKN-01 serum concentration (Cmax) after the first and fourth infusion on Cycle 1 Weeks 1 and 4, for both Parts A and B. Cycle 1 Day 1 included once per week (QW) dosing groups and every two weeks (Q2W) dosing groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=18 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of DKN-01
|
22756.09897 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7665.992335
|
47838.87113 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4193.154016
|
130105.94600 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 25705.162094
|
183063.33233 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 34635.447386
|
119837.93546 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 43565.776017
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 22 (Fourth dose for QW groups)Population: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A of the study.
Peak DKN-01 serum concentration (Cmax) after the fourth infusion on Cycle 1 Weeks 1 and 4, for both Parts A and B. Cycle 1 day 22 included only QW dosing groups.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of DKN-01
|
43203.11520 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 25085.681036
|
105148.29720 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 29480.395189
|
224382.14533 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 28438.209780
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from the date of signed informed consent to the first date of objectively determined progressive disease or death from any causePopulation: All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study.
For both Parts A and B. PFS was defined as the time from the date of signed informed consent to the first date of objectively determined progressive disease (Progression is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) and International Multiple Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)) or death from any cause. For patients who were still alive at the time of analysis (i.e, data cut-off date) and without evidence of tumor progression, PFS was censored at the date of the most recent objective progression-free observation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=4 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=19 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Who Are Refractory or Intolerant to Standard/Approved Therapies
|
3.4 Months
Interval 2.2 to 4.7
|
2.4 Months
Interval 1.7 to 3.3
|
2.1 Months
Interval 1.5 to 2.2
|
2.1 Months
Interval 2.1 to 2.2
|
2.2 Months
Interval 1.5 to 2.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time from the date of signed informed consent to the date of death from any causePopulation: For patients who are still alive as of the data cut-off date, OS time will be censored on the date of the patient's last contact (last contact for patients in post-discontinuation = last Date of Contact in Long Term Follow-up eCRF).
For Part B only. OS was defined as the time from the date of signed informed consent to the date of death from any cause. For patients who were still alive as of the data cut-off date, OS time was censored on the date of the patient's last contact (last contact for patients in post-discontinuation was the last date of contact in long-term follow-up eCRF).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=19 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory NSCLC
|
6.6 Months
Interval 4.1 to 10.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part A: Every 2 months; Part B: after 1 month and every two cycles thereafterPopulation: All patients with NSCLC who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. One Patients from the 300 mg QW treatment group, and two patients from 300 mg Q2W treatment group did not have assessments performed after Baseline.
For both Parts A and B. Objective response rate is defined as the number of patients with overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=3 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=17 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Oncologic Patients Who Are Refractory or Intolerant to Standard/Approved Therapies
|
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.8
|
1 Participants
Interval 0.1 to 26.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Part A: Every 2 months; Part B: after 1 month and every two cycles thereafterPopulation: FAS : NSCLC - All patients with NSCLC who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Two patients in treatment group 300 mg Q2W did not have assessments performed after Baseline.
FAS : For both Parts A and B. Objective response rate is defined as the number of patients with overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=2 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
n=1 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A (QW)
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A (Q2W)
n=2 Participants
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B (Q2W)
n=17 Participants
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
Total
Total across all treatment groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
|
0 participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.2
|
0 participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
—
|
0 participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.2
|
1 participants
Interval 0.1 to 26.0
|
—
|
Adverse Events
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A
150 mg DKN-01 Part A
300 mg DKN-01 Part A
600 mg DKN-01 Part A
300 mg DKN-01 Part B
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=4 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B
n=19 participants at risk
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ARREST
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ASCITES
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
PAIN MANAGEMENT
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PLEURAL EFFUSION
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RESPIRATORY FAILURE
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Vascular disorders
SUPERIOR VENA CAVA SYNDROME
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
75 Milligram (mg) DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
150 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method will be guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=4 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
600 mg DKN-01 Part A
n=3 participants at risk
DKN-01: DKN-01 was administered intravenously (IV) once a week over a minimum of 30 minutes and up to a maximum of 2 hours for dose levels of 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. At the 600 mg dose level, DKN-01 was administered by IV on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. PART A - Dose Escalation: Study group of 3 participants were treated with a 28 day cycle of DKN-01 at an assigned dose level until disease progression. Dose escalation occurred sequentially over the doses of 75, 150, 300, and 600 mg until the criteria for reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were met or the highest planned dose study group was completed. Cycle 1 defined the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period that governs dose escalation. The dose escalation method was guided by the incidence of DLTs during the first cycle.
|
300 mg DKN-01 Part B
n=19 participants at risk
Dose Confirmation: Once the MTD had been established or the highest planned dose level completed, 300 mg of DKN-01 was administered as IV on days 1 and 15 of every 28 day cycle.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
50.0%
2/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
General disorders
FATIGUE
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
75.0%
3/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
31.6%
6/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITTING
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
General disorders
ASTHENIA
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPHAGIA
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
66.7%
2/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMONIA
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PRODUCTIVE COUGH
|
33.3%
1/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Entirety of the study. 1 year, 3 months.
Safety analyses were based on the full analysis set (FAS), which was defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment during Part A or Part B of the study. Assessments up to 30 days after the date of last dose of study medication (for serious adverse events and unresolved study drug-related AEs) were included.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publication of the results shall not be made before the publication by Sponsor. If there is no multi-site publication within 18 months after the Study completion/termination at all sites, the Site shall have the right to publish its results. Prior to submitting to public release the Sponsor has 60 days from receipt to review and comment. The Site shall, upon Sponsor's request, further delay publication/presentation for up to 120 days to allow Sponsor to protect its interests.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER