Trial Outcomes & Findings for Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion With Sevoflurane and Remifentanil (NCT NCT01456299)

NCT ID: NCT01456299

Last Updated: 2019-03-15

Results Overview

The pre-determined effect-site concentration of remifentanil or normal saline was administered according to the patient's group.LMAs were size #3 for women and #4 for men.The conditions of the LMA insertion were graded on a three point scale using six variables (mouth opening, ease of LMA insertion, swallowing, coughing and gagging, head and body movements, laryngospasm). Each of these variables was rated as excellent, intermediate or poor.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

102 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at that time on LMA insertion only

Results posted on

2019-03-15

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Remifentanil 1
The R1 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 1 ng/ml control: Patients received a normal saline only
Control
The control group, which received an infusion of normal saline remifentanil 1: The patients received an infusion of remifentanil
Remifentanil 2
The R2 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 2 ng/ml remifentanil 2: Patients received no remifentanil
Overall Study
STARTED
34
34
34
Overall Study
COMPLETED
34
33
33
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion With Sevoflurane and Remifentanil

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control
n=33 Participants
The control group, which received an infusion of normal saline remifentanil 1: The patients received an infusion of remifentanil
Remifentanil 1
n=34 Participants
The R1 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 1 ng/ml control: Patients received a normal saline only
Remifentanil 2
n=33 Participants
The R2 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 2 ng/ml remifentanil 2: Patients received no remifentanil
Total
n=100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=7 Participants
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
100 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
40 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
33 participants
n=5 Participants
34 participants
n=7 Participants
33 participants
n=5 Participants
100 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at that time on LMA insertion only

The pre-determined effect-site concentration of remifentanil or normal saline was administered according to the patient's group.LMAs were size #3 for women and #4 for men.The conditions of the LMA insertion were graded on a three point scale using six variables (mouth opening, ease of LMA insertion, swallowing, coughing and gagging, head and body movements, laryngospasm). Each of these variables was rated as excellent, intermediate or poor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Remifentanil 1
n=34 Participants
The R1 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 1 ng/ml control: Patients received a normal saline only
Remifentanil 2
n=33 Participants
The R2 group, which received a target effect-site remifentanil concentration of 2 ng/ml remifentanil 2: Patients received no remifentanil
Control
n=33 Participants
The control group, which received an infusion of normal saline remifentanil 1: The patients received an infusion of remifentanil
LMA Insertion Condition
Excellent
21 participants
24 participants
14 participants
LMA Insertion Condition
Intermediate
5 participants
3 participants
7 participants
LMA Insertion Condition
Poor
8 participants
6 participants
12 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 30sec after drug injection

If prolonged apnoea (\> 30 s) developed, manual ventilation was assisted. And record the frequency of apnea on each group

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Remifentanil 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Remifentanil 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr.Kim

Ajou University

Phone: 82-32-460-3400

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place