Trial Outcomes & Findings for In Vivo Optical Spectroscopy Monitoring in a New Model of Muscular Compartment Syndrome (NCT NCT01452425)

NCT ID: NCT01452425

Last Updated: 2014-12-22

Results Overview

A comparison will be made between the INVOS monitoring and non invasive (transcutaneous) EMG monitoring (AP Block), to determine the accuracy of the INVOS monitoring to predict AP block. Measures were: \[mean (SD)\] INVOS (in %) value at baseline and at the time of the block

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1

Target enrollment

10 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

45 minutes

Results posted on

2014-12-22

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tourniquet
Inflation of a tourniquet Tourniquet: Inflation of a tourniquet (pressure equal to the mean arterial pressure) obtaining a model of slight venous congestion and arterial hypoperfusion
Overall Study
STARTED
10
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

In Vivo Optical Spectroscopy Monitoring in a New Model of Muscular Compartment Syndrome

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tourniquet
n=10 Participants
No adverse event
Age, Customized
age
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 • n=113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
n=113 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 45 minutes

A comparison will be made between the INVOS monitoring and non invasive (transcutaneous) EMG monitoring (AP Block), to determine the accuracy of the INVOS monitoring to predict AP block. Measures were: \[mean (SD)\] INVOS (in %) value at baseline and at the time of the block

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tourniquet
n=10 Participants
Inflation of a tourniquet Tourniquet: Inflation of a tourniquet (pressure equal to the mean arterial pressure) obtaining a model of slight venous congestion and arterial hypoperfusion
Comparison Between INVOS Monitoring and Electromyography
INVOS (Baseline)
73 % of StcO2
Standard Deviation 9
Comparison Between INVOS Monitoring and Electromyography
INVOS (At time of the block)
46 % of StcO2
Standard Deviation 11

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 45 minutes

\[mean (SD)\] ICP (in mmHg), value at baseline and at the time of the block

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tourniquet
n=10 Participants
Inflation of a tourniquet Tourniquet: Inflation of a tourniquet (pressure equal to the mean arterial pressure) obtaining a model of slight venous congestion and arterial hypoperfusion
Intracompartmental Pressure (ICP)
ICP (Baseline)
17 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9
Intracompartmental Pressure (ICP)
ICP (At time of the block)
70 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6

Adverse Events

Tourniquet

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Pr Patrice Forget

UCLouvain

Phone: 3227641821

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place