Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia (NCT NCT01444456)

NCT ID: NCT01444456

Last Updated: 2017-03-20

Results Overview

Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at Week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

1262 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to Week 9 (Treatment Day 57). Due to the observational nature of the study and variation in ESA dosing schedules, assessments closest to day 57 and within Days 43 to 70 (inclusive) were used to calculate the Week 9 visit results.

Results posted on

2017-03-20

Participant Flow

Open to patients receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia. First patient enrolled 10 october 2011; last patient enrolled 28 May 2013.

Before enrolling participants, each country was assigned to either cohort 1 (patients receiving only darbepoetin alfa) or cohort 2 (patients receiving any ESA). Cohort 2 was assigned only to those countries in which local regulations did not permit observational study participation by participants receiving a specific agent in a drug class.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Overall Study
STARTED
1262
Overall Study
Received Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
1158
Overall Study
Received Darbepoetin Alfa
1134
Overall Study
COMPLETED
977
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
285

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
21
Overall Study
Physician Decision
9
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
37
Overall Study
Death
73
Overall Study
Ineligibility determined
23
Overall Study
Other
18
Overall Study
Not treated
104

Baseline Characteristics

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Age, Continuous
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
691 Participants
n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
467 Participants
n=93 Participants
Fatigue-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
51.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6 • n=93 Participants
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score
28.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=93 Participants
Hemoglobin level
9.3 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=93 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 9 (Treatment Day 57). Due to the observational nature of the study and variation in ESA dosing schedules, assessments closest to day 57 and within Days 43 to 70 (inclusive) were used to calculate the Week 9 visit results.

Population: The Primary analysis set consists of enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of darbepoetin alfa, have baseline assessments for each of Hemoglobin, FACT-F subscale and VAS, and analyzable post-baseline assessments for each of Hemoglobin, FACT-F subscale, and VAS at Week 9.

Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at Week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Darbepoetin Alfa With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
31.8 percentage of participants
Interval 27.7 to 35.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 9

Population: Primary analysis set

Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Breast cancer (N=152)
38.8 percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 46.6
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Prostate cancer (N=39)
28.2 percentage of participants
Interval 14.1 to 42.3
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Small cell lung cancer (N=12)
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 37.8
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Non-small cell lung cancer (N=70)
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 39.2
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Colorectal cancer (N=71)
31.0 percentage of participants
Interval 20.2 to 41.7
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Ovarian cancer (N=79)
38.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.3 to 48.7
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Bladder cancer (N=16)
0.0 percentage of participants
Confidence interval could not be calculated since there were no participants with both PPF improvement and hemoglobin increase.
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Endometrial cancer (N=12)
8.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Renal cancer (N=10)
10.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 28.6
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Pancreatic cancer (N=31)
35.5 percentage of participants
Interval 18.6 to 52.3
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Esophogeal cancer (N=3)
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 86.7
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Gastric cancer (N=15)
26.7 percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 49.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9

Population: Primary analysis set participants with a fatigue VAS score improvement at Week 9 of 5 ± 3 points from Baseline

The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items (statements) that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants are asked to indicate how they feel in response to each of the 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale can range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. A positive change (\>0) from baseline score constitutes an improvement in fatigue between Baseline and Week 9. The fatigue-visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100-point scale where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=44 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Mean Change From Baseline in FACT-F Score for Participants With a VAS Improvement of 5 ± 3 Points
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 9

Population: Primary analysis set

Time from Baseline to first increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1 g/dL

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Time to First Increase in Hemoglobin
36.5 days
Interval 30.0 to 43.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 13

Population: Primary analysis set

The percentage of participants with iimprovement in PPF at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13). Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]). The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the FACT-An questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient-perceived Fatigue (PPF) at Any Time
70.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 13

Population: Primary analysis set

The percentage of participants with increase in hemoglobin (≥ 1 g/dL) at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL at Any Time
75.7 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 participants at risk
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 participants at risk
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Eye disorders
Cystoid macular oedema
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
General disorders
Injection site pain
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.

Additional Information

Study Director

Amgen Inc.

Phone: 866-572-6436

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results aftercompletion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER