Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia (NCT NCT01444456)
NCT ID: NCT01444456
Last Updated: 2017-03-20
Results Overview
Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at Week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).
COMPLETED
1262 participants
Baseline to Week 9 (Treatment Day 57). Due to the observational nature of the study and variation in ESA dosing schedules, assessments closest to day 57 and within Days 43 to 70 (inclusive) were used to calculate the Week 9 visit results.
2017-03-20
Participant Flow
Open to patients receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia. First patient enrolled 10 october 2011; last patient enrolled 28 May 2013.
Before enrolling participants, each country was assigned to either cohort 1 (patients receiving only darbepoetin alfa) or cohort 2 (patients receiving any ESA). Cohort 2 was assigned only to those countries in which local regulations did not permit observational study participation by participants receiving a specific agent in a drug class.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1262
|
|
Overall Study
Received Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
|
1158
|
|
Overall Study
Received Darbepoetin Alfa
|
1134
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
977
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
285
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
Ineligibility determined
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Not treated
|
104
|
Baseline Characteristics
Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
691 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
467 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Fatigue-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
|
51.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score
|
28.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin level
|
9.3 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 9 (Treatment Day 57). Due to the observational nature of the study and variation in ESA dosing schedules, assessments closest to day 57 and within Days 43 to 70 (inclusive) were used to calculate the Week 9 visit results.Population: The Primary analysis set consists of enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of darbepoetin alfa, have baseline assessments for each of Hemoglobin, FACT-F subscale and VAS, and analyzable post-baseline assessments for each of Hemoglobin, FACT-F subscale, and VAS at Week 9.
Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at Week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Darbepoetin Alfa With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
|
31.8 percentage of participants
Interval 27.7 to 35.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 9Population: Primary analysis set
Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement at week 9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]), and an increase in hemoglobin was defined as ≥ 1 g/dL increase from Baseline. The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Breast cancer (N=152)
|
38.8 percentage of participants
Interval 31.1 to 46.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Prostate cancer (N=39)
|
28.2 percentage of participants
Interval 14.1 to 42.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Small cell lung cancer (N=12)
|
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 37.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Non-small cell lung cancer (N=70)
|
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 39.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Colorectal cancer (N=71)
|
31.0 percentage of participants
Interval 20.2 to 41.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Ovarian cancer (N=79)
|
38.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.3 to 48.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Bladder cancer (N=16)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Confidence interval could not be calculated since there were no participants with both PPF improvement and hemoglobin increase.
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Endometrial cancer (N=12)
|
8.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 24.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Renal cancer (N=10)
|
10.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 28.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Pancreatic cancer (N=31)
|
35.5 percentage of participants
Interval 18.6 to 52.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Esophogeal cancer (N=3)
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 86.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Tumor Type With Improvement in Patient Perceived Fatigue (PPF) and Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL
Gastric cancer (N=15)
|
26.7 percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 49.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9Population: Primary analysis set participants with a fatigue VAS score improvement at Week 9 of 5 ± 3 points from Baseline
The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items (statements) that are a subset of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anaemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Participants are asked to indicate how they feel in response to each of the 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale can range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. A positive change (\>0) from baseline score constitutes an improvement in fatigue between Baseline and Week 9. The fatigue-visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100-point scale where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=44 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in FACT-F Score for Participants With a VAS Improvement of 5 ± 3 Points
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Week 9Population: Primary analysis set
Time from Baseline to first increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1 g/dL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Time to First Increase in Hemoglobin
|
36.5 days
Interval 30.0 to 43.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 13Population: Primary analysis set
The percentage of participants with iimprovement in PPF at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13). Improvement in PPF was defined as improvement in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) score of ≥ 3.5 points from Baseline (the minimally important difference \[MID\]). The FACT-F MID was determined by the mean FACT-F change score (between Baseline and Week 9) for participants who had an improvement in the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 ± 3 points. The FACT-F subscale consists of 13 fatigue-related items that are a subset of the FACT-An questionnaire. Participants indicate how they feel in response to 13 statements on a scale from 0 for "Not at all" to 4 for "Very much". Total scores for the FACT-F subscale range from 0 to 52; the higher the score the better the quality of life. The fatigue-VAS is a 100-point scale, where fatigue-levels are rated from 0 (least fatigue) to 100 (worst possible fatigue).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient-perceived Fatigue (PPF) at Any Time
|
70.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 13Population: Primary analysis set
The percentage of participants with increase in hemoglobin (≥ 1 g/dL) at any time from Day 2 until the end-of-study assessment (Week 13).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa
n=510 Participants
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Increase in Hemoglobin ≥ 1 g/dL at Any Time
|
75.7 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 participants at risk
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Darbepoetin Alfa or Other ESA
n=1158 participants at risk
Participants receiving systemic chemotherapy for solid tumors who also received darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) or another erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) to treat symptomatic anemia according to routine institutional practice.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cystoid macular oedema
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.09%
1/1158 • Up to 28 days after a participant's last dose date, capped at 17 weeks
Only adverse drug reactions to Amgen products were collected in this study. The table of Other Adverse Events summarizes non-serious occurrences of adverse drug reactions.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Amgen Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results aftercompletion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER