Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pancreas Resection With and Without Drains (NCT NCT01441492)
NCT ID: NCT01441492
Last Updated: 2020-08-31
Results Overview
The primary outcome measure was defined as the number of patients with grade 2 or higher grade complications within 60 days of the date of surgery will be meticulously recorded using specific and standardized definitions. Complications will be graded in severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE (v4.0) (Grade 1-5) unless otherwise stated below. For grading schemes with A, B, C rather than 1-5, severity scores will be converted to 1-3.
COMPLETED
NA
399 participants
60 days
2020-08-31
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
No Drains
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
197
|
202
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
170
|
174
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
28
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Pancreas Resection With and Without Drains
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
Total
n=344 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60 years
n=5 Participants
|
61 years
n=7 Participants
|
61 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
102 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
205 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
249 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThe primary outcome measure was defined as the number of patients with grade 2 or higher grade complications within 60 days of the date of surgery will be meticulously recorded using specific and standardized definitions. Complications will be graded in severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE (v4.0) (Grade 1-5) unless otherwise stated below. For grading schemes with A, B, C rather than 1-5, severity scores will be converted to 1-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
60-day ≥ Grade II Complication Rate
|
72 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThis secondary outcome measure was defined as the number of patients with one or more complications with grade 3 or higher grade within 60 days of the date of surgery. Complications will be graded in severity suing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE(v4.0) (Grade 1-5). For grading schemes with A, B, C rather than 1-5, severity scores will be converted to 1-3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
60-day ≥ Grade III Complication Rate
|
44 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThis secondary outcome measure is the number of patients with one or more SAE within 60 days of the date of surgery. This outcome will be presented in the Adverse Event Module. The total number of patients affected were 344 (# of no drain=170 vs # of drain=174) and two patients were experienced the serious adverse event (SAE) defined by the protocol. Refer to the Adverse events tables for specifics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Rate
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThis will be calculated for all patients and among just the patients who experienced complications. The complication will be graded in severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE (v4.0) and the severity grade is from 1 to 5. The outcome measure is the median of the Sum of the complication grades of each complication experienced by the patient/# of complications experienced
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Median Complication Severity Grade
All patients
|
1 severity grade
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
1 severity grade
Interval 0.0 to 4.0
|
|
Median Complication Severity Grade
For just the patients with complications
|
4 severity grade
Interval 2.0 to 7.0
|
3 severity grade
Interval 2.0 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThis is the median number of complications per patients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
60-day Frequency of Complications
|
1 Complications per patient
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
1 Complications per patient
Interval 0.0 to 2.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
90-day Mortality Rate
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThe outcome measure is the number of patients with each particular complication but not including serious adverse events. The complication is using using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events CTCAE (v4.0).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Pancreatic_leak_fistula
|
20 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Postoperative_Abdominal_FluidCollection
|
38 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Biliary_leak
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Enteric_leak
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Lymph_Leak
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Diarrhea
|
17 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Gastroparesis_DelayedGastricEmptying
|
9 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
SmallBowelObstruction
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Seroma
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Intra_abd_abscess
|
13 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Wound_Dehiscence
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Wound_Infection
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Rate of Specific Complications
Fever
|
36 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysThis is the median of length of stay for the index admission. An index admission is an admission in a hospital with a principal diagnosis of a specified condition that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria for that measure. Total days in the hospital within 60 days of surgery was not collected for analysis. Only length of stay for the index admission was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Stay for the Index Admission
|
5 days
Interval 4.0 to 6.0
|
5 days
Interval 4.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 60 daysPopulation: Data were not collected for analysis
This is the crude cost of subsequent procedures (CT scan, paracentesis, percutaneous drainage, reoperation) and the length of the index admission and any subsequent readmission. Data were not collected for analysis.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 days and 60 daysPopulation: The result is the quality of score at 30 days.
Subjects will complete the FACT-PA quality of life instrument and the results will be recorded. The quality of life scores at 30 days was collected for analysis. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Pancreatic Cancer (FACT-PA), is a self-administered pancreas-specific health status survey. The instrument is scored on a scale of 0-28 for Physical well-being subscale(PWB), Social/Family well-being subscale(SWB), Functional well-being subscale(FWB), and on a scale of 0-24 for Emotional well-being subscale(EWB), and on a scale of 0-36 for additional condition of FACT-PA (FACT-PA subscale). The total FACT-G score is the sum of PWB, SWB, FWB, and EWB and the range of 0\~108. The total FACT-PA score is the sum of the total FACT-G score and FACT-Pa subscale and the range of 0\~144. A lower score represents the worst quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 Participants
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 Participants
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Physical well-being subscale
|
21 score on a scale
Interval 14.0 to 27.0
|
21 score on a scale
Interval 16.0 to 24.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Social/Family well-being subscale
|
21 score on a scale
Interval 12.0 to 22.0
|
21 score on a scale
Interval 18.0 to 22.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Emotional well-being subscale
|
20 score on a scale
Interval 18.0 to 23.0
|
20 score on a scale
Interval 17.0 to 23.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Functional well-being subscale
|
17 score on a scale
Interval 12.0 to 22.0
|
17 score on a scale
Interval 12.0 to 21.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Total FACT-G score
|
79 score on a scale
Interval 63.0 to 88.0
|
79 score on a scale
Interval 66.0 to 87.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
FACT-Pa subscale
|
25 score on a scale
Interval 21.0 to 28.0
|
26 score on a scale
Interval 21.0 to 29.0
|
|
Composite Quality of Life Scores
Total FACT-Pa score
|
104 score on a scale
Interval 84.0 to 114.0
|
105 score on a scale
Interval 87.0 to 116.0
|
Adverse Events
No Drains
Drains
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 participants at risk
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 participants at risk
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Grade 3 intra-abdominal infection and pancreatic leak/fistula
|
1.2%
2/170 • Number of events 2 • 30 days and 60 days
|
0.00%
0/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
No Drains
n=170 participants at risk
Patients did not receive intraperitoneal drainage following pancreas resection.
No Drains: A closed-suction drain was not be placed near the transection margin at the time of surgery in the experimental group.
|
Drains
n=174 participants at risk
Patients did receive drain(s), the standard of care treatment, following pancreas resection.
Drains: A drain was placed near the pancreatic transection margin at the time of surgery (standard of care).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic_leak_fistula
|
11.8%
20/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
50.6%
88/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Postoperative_Abdominal_FluidCollection
|
22.4%
38/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
8.6%
15/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Biliary_leak
|
0.59%
1/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
0.57%
1/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteric_leak
|
1.2%
2/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
0.57%
1/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lymph_Leak
|
0.59%
1/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
0.57%
1/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
10.0%
17/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
5.2%
9/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroparesis_DelayedGastricEmptying
|
5.3%
9/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
5.7%
10/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
SmallBowelObstruction
|
0.59%
1/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
1.7%
3/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Seroma
|
1.8%
3/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
1.7%
3/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Intra_abd_abscess
|
7.6%
13/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
8.6%
15/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound_Dehiscence
|
3.5%
6/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
2.3%
4/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound_Infection
|
2.9%
5/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
4.6%
8/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fever
|
21.2%
36/170 • 30 days and 60 days
|
17.2%
30/174 • 30 days and 60 days
|
Additional Information
Amy McElhany, Clinical Research Manager
Baylor College of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place