Trial Outcomes & Findings for Loop Diuretics Administration and Acute Heart Failure (NCT NCT01441245)
NCT ID: NCT01441245
Last Updated: 2018-01-23
Results Overview
this study aimed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion of furosemide in comparison to twice daily regimens at similar doses with respect to changes in renal function in terms of creatinine levels and GFR, urine output and BNP levels from admission to discharge
COMPLETED
PHASE4
57 participants
time period ranging from 72 h to 120 h.
2018-01-23
Participant Flow
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Section Centre into a Para-Intensive Unit (Siena, Italy) from April 2011 to December 2012.
22 were excluded because of normal renal function at baseline, 11 for receiving different dosages of intravenous furosemide, 4 for isolated diastolic HF
Participant milestones
| Measure |
cIV Group
The group that received the continuous infusion of furosemide (cIV), consisted of 30 patients.
|
iIV Group
The second group that received the same drug in bolus injections twice a day (iIV), consisted of 27 patients.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Loop Diuretics Administration and Acute Heart Failure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
cIV Group
n=30 Participants
The group that received the continuous infusion of furosemide (cIV), consisted of 30 patients.
|
iIV Group
n=27 Participants
The group that received the intermittent infusion of furosemide (iIV), consisted of 27 patients.
|
Total
n=57 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=5 Participants
|
73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
|
72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 participants
n=7 Participants
|
57 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: time period ranging from 72 h to 120 h.this study aimed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion of furosemide in comparison to twice daily regimens at similar doses with respect to changes in renal function in terms of creatinine levels and GFR, urine output and BNP levels from admission to discharge
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Mean Urine Output Volume During the Infusion Period
|
2505 mL
Standard Deviation 796
|
2140 mL
Standard Deviation 468
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 daysPopulation: All data were analyzed with intention-to-treat. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared with t test for independent groups. p values \<0.05 were considered significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Renal Function in Terms of Creatinine Levels at Discharge
|
1.78 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
1.51 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 13 daysPopulation: All data were analyzed with intention-to-treat. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared with t test for independent groups. p values \<0.05 were considered significant.
evaluation of renal function in terms of changes in creatinine levels during hospitalization in the two arms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Renal Function in Terms of Changes in Creatinine Levels
|
-0.10 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
-0.50 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Levels From Admission to the End of Treatment
|
679 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 397
|
949 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 548
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 13 daysPopulation: Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared with t test for independent groups. p values \<0.05 were considered significant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Levels From Admission to the Discharge
|
-525 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 615
|
-148 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 463
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 daysOutcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Renal Function in Terms of Changes in GFR
|
-3.18 (ml/min·1.73 m2)
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
-1.93 (ml/min·1.73 m2)
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from admission to discharge, an average of 12 daysPopulation: Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared with t test for independent groups. p values \<0.05 were considered significant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Renal Function in Terms of GFR Values at Discharge
|
44.8 (ml/min·1.73 m2)
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
46.7 (ml/min·1.73 m2)
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: in-hospitalPopulation: Qualitative variables are expressed as percentage and compared with chi-square test . p values \<0.05 were considered significant.
percentage of participants with hospital stay \> 10 days
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Hospitalization in the Two Groups
|
80 percentage of partecipants
|
44 percentage of partecipants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: in-hospitalOutcome measures
| Measure |
Urine Output in cIV
n=30 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
Urine Output in iIV
n=27 Participants
Evaluation of urine output in Intermittent intravenous furosemide infusion group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dopamine Infusion During Hospitalization
|
50 percentage of partecipants
|
26 percentage of partecipants
|
Adverse Events
cIV Group
iIV Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
cIV Group
n=30 participants at risk
The group that received the continuous infusion of furosemide (cIV), consisted of 30 patients.
|
iIV Group
n=27 participants at risk
The second group that received the same drug in bolus injections twice a day (iIV), consisted of 27 patients.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
death
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 6 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
11.1%
3/27 • Number of events 3 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes
|
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 8 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
22.2%
6/27 • Number of events 6 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
needing renal replacement therapy
|
0.00%
0/30 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
0.00%
0/27 • The 6-months follow-up events encompassed: cardiac death, rehospitalization for all cardiovascular causes, and severe renal insufficiency needing hemodialysis.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Alberto Palazzuoli MD, Cardiology Unit
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Le Scotte hospital, Siena, Italy
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place