Trial Outcomes & Findings for SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (NCT NCT01435759)

NCT ID: NCT01435759

Last Updated: 2021-06-09

Results Overview

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. CHange in MADRS total score in Augmentsion Baseline to Week 16.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

1197 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Results posted on

2021-06-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Antidepressant + Single-blind Placebo
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily single-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
STARTED
1197
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
COMPLETED
855
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
NOT COMPLETED
342
0
0
0
0
0
Double-blind Phase
STARTED
463
78
78
78
78
80
Double-blind Phase
COMPLETED
397
71
71
69
69
71
Double-blind Phase
NOT COMPLETED
66
7
7
9
9
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Antidepressant + Single-blind Placebo
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily single-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Adverse Event
40
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Protocol Violation
16
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
74
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Lost to Follow-up
83
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Met BP or Pulse Withdrawal Criteria
10
0
0
0
0
0
Antidepressant Lead-in Phase
Other
119
0
0
0
0
0
Double-blind Phase
Adverse Event
7
0
1
1
1
3
Double-blind Phase
Protocol Violation
2
0
1
2
0
1
Double-blind Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
17
4
3
4
2
2
Double-blind Phase
Lost to Follow-up
31
1
2
0
3
3
Double-blind Phase
Met BP or Pulse Withdrawal Criteria
1
0
0
0
3
0
Double-blind Phase
Other
8
2
0
2
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

SPD489 in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=78 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=77 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=76 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=78 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=80 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Total
n=389 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
43.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48 • n=5 Participants
39.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.83 • n=7 Participants
43.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06 • n=5 Participants
43.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=4 Participants
41.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81 • n=21 Participants
42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61 • n=10 Participants
Age, Customized
18-55
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
60 Participants
n=4 Participants
71 Participants
n=21 Participants
332 Participants
n=10 Participants
Age, Customized
56-65
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
57 Participants
n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
53 Participants
n=4 Participants
53 Participants
n=21 Participants
264 Participants
n=10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
27 Participants
n=21 Participants
125 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ARGENTINA
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
18 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRALIA
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
5 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CHILE
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
32 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
64 Participants
n=4 Participants
70 Participants
n=21 Participants
333 Participants
n=10 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Population: Dose Response Evaluable Set (DRES): All randomized subjects who had at least 1 valid primary efficacy measurement (MADRS total score) during the Dose Maintenance Period (Weeks 11-16) while on the target dose level of investigational product.

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression. CHange in MADRS total score in Augmentsion Baseline to Week 16.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=72 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=71 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=69 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=66 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=71 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Change in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16 (Double-blind Phase, Dose Response Evaluable Set)
-5.4 units on a scale
Interval -7.2 to -3.5
-6.7 units on a scale
Interval -8.6 to -4.9
-5.3 units on a scale
Interval -7.1 to -3.4
-6.1 units on a scale
Interval -8.1 to -4.1
-6.3 units on a scale
Interval -8.2 to -4.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Population: Vital Signs Evaluable Set: All randomized subjects who had at least 1 valid vital signs measurement during the Dose Maintenance Period while on the target dose level of investigational product.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=67 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=68 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=65 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=51 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=63 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Change in Average Systolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.55
0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.58
0.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.17
3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.82
2.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Population: Vital Signs Evaluable Set: All randomized subjects who had at least 1 valid vital signs measurement during the Dose Maintenance Period while on the target dose level of investigational product.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=67 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=68 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=65 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=51 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=63 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Change in Average Diastolic Blood Pressure From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
-0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.69
-0.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.64
-0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.39
2.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.58
1.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.45

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16

Population: Vital Signs Evaluable Set: All randomized subjects who had at least 1 valid vital signs measurement during the Dose Maintenance Period while on the target dose level of investigational product.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=67 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=68 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=65 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=51 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=63 Participants
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Change in Average Pulse Rate From Augmentation Baseline (Week 8) to Week 16
-0.8 bpm
Standard Deviation 9.95
0.8 bpm
Standard Deviation 7.32
5.3 bpm
Standard Deviation 8.08
4.0 bpm
Standard Deviation 9.80
6.0 bpm
Standard Deviation 11.25

Adverse Events

Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 20 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 30 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 29 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 36 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 44 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=78 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=77 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=76 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=78 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=80 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.00%
0/78
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/77
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/76
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/78
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Antidepressant + Double-blind Placebo
n=78 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily double-blind placebo (matching SPD489).
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 10mg
n=77 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 10mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 30mg
n=76 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 30mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 50mg
n=78 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 50mg dose.
Antidepressant + Double-blind SPD489 70mg
n=80 participants at risk
Subjects received unblinded standard antidepressant therapy (either escitalopram oxalate or venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release titrated to the maximum tolerated dose) plus oral, once daily over-encapsulated SPD489 as a 70mg dose.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/77 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.9%
3/76 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.2%
5/80 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/77 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
12.8%
10/78 • Number of events 10
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
12.5%
10/80 • Number of events 10
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.5%
5/77 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
7.9%
6/76 • Number of events 6
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
General disorders
Fatigue
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/77
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.3%
4/76 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/78
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.5%
5/77 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.3%
4/76 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
8.8%
7/80 • Number of events 8
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/78
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.9%
3/77 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.9%
3/76 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
6.4%
5/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
0.00%
0/78
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/76
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.2%
4/77 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.6%
5/76 • Number of events 6
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.4%
5/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.0%
4/80 • Number of events 6
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/77 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.4%
5/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
12.8%
10/78 • Number of events 12
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
9.1%
7/77 • Number of events 8
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
6.6%
5/76 • Number of events 9
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.8%
3/78 • Number of events 5
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
10.0%
8/80 • Number of events 9
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Psychiatric disorders
Bruxism
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/77
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/76 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.1%
4/78 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
7.5%
6/80 • Number of events 7
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
2.6%
2/78 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
9.1%
7/77 • Number of events 9
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
2.6%
2/76 • Number of events 2
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
10.3%
8/78 • Number of events 10
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
11.2%
9/80 • Number of events 11
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
5.2%
4/77 • Number of events 4
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
0.00%
0/76
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
1.3%
1/78 • Number of events 1
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.
3.8%
3/80 • Number of events 3
Safety Analysis Set: All subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and who had at least 1 post-augmentation baseline safety assessment (e.g. coming back for any visit, reporting of an AE or reporting the absence of AEs). Subjects who received only single-blind placebo were not included in this group.

Additional Information

Study Director

Shire

Phone: +1 866 842 5335

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER