Trial Outcomes & Findings for EXPERT CTO: Evaluation of the XIENCE PRIME™ LL and XIENCE Nano™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Coronary Stents, Performance, and Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions (NCT NCT01435031)
NCT ID: NCT01435031
Last Updated: 2018-05-09
Results Overview
The primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
COMPLETED
NA
250 participants
1 year
2018-05-09
Participant Flow
A total of 250 subjects were enrolled in 20 sites from September 13, 2011 to February 7, 2013. Twenty-eight participants were excluded from ITT (N=222) in whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion were not completed and/or study stent was not inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
ITT set included 222 subjects who met entry criteria, were enrolled in the trial and whose target lesion was successfully crossed and predilated. PP set included all ITT subjects (N = 183) in whom at least 1 study stent was implanted,met procedure success,had follow-up data and had no major protocol deviations due to inappropriate enrollment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
ITT at 1 Month
STARTED
|
222
|
|
ITT at 1 Month
COMPLETED
|
216
|
|
ITT at 1 Month
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
|
ITT at 6 Months
STARTED
|
216
|
|
ITT at 6 Months
COMPLETED
|
211
|
|
ITT at 6 Months
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
STARTED
|
211
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
COMPLETED
|
202
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
STARTED
|
202
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
COMPLETED
|
189
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
STARTED
|
189
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
COMPLETED
|
178
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
STARTED
|
178
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
COMPLETED
|
171
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
ITT at 1 Month
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
ITT at 1 Month
Death
|
1
|
|
ITT at 1 Month
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
ITT at 6 Months
Death
|
2
|
|
ITT at 6 Months
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
Death
|
1
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
ITT at 1 Year
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
Death
|
7
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
ITT at 2 Years
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
Death
|
5
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
ITT at 3 Years
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
Death
|
4
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
|
ITT at 4 Years
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
EXPERT CTO: Evaluation of the XIENCE PRIME™ LL and XIENCE Nano™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Coronary Stents, Performance, and Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
180 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
178 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
222 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Previous Percutaneous Intervention (PCI)
|
96 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Stroke
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Congestive Heart Failure
|
27 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Diabetes Mellitus
|
89 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Hypertension
|
203 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Dyslipidemia
|
215 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Renal Insufficiency/failure
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Atrial fibrillation
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
History of bleeding
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Cancer
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Clinical Characteristics
Mental Illness
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tobacco use
Never used tobacco
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tobacco use
Former user, quit more than 1 month ago
|
89 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tobacco use
Current or former, quit within the past month
|
54 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of diseased vessels
Single
|
170 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of diseased vessels
Double
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of diseased vessels
Triple
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Intention-to-treat (ITT) definition: ITT subjects include all subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and whose target lesion was successfully crossed and predilated.
The primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=211 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per ITT Set)
|
39 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Per-protocol (PP) definition: The per-protocol population is defined as all ITT subjects in whom at least 1 study stent was implanted, met procedure success, had available follow up data (i.e. a MACE event within 360 days or follow up of at least 330 days), and did not have major protocol deviations due to inappropriate enrollment.
The primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=183 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per Protocol Set)
|
15 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: All the subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and in whom an attempt was made to cross the target lesion with the HT Progress or the HT Pilot guide wires, are included in the ITT population for the guide wire-related analysis.
Successful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on ARC MI (component 2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=138 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)
Guide Wire-related Endpoint
|
79.0 percentage of participants
Interval 71.2 to 85.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)
Component 1
|
89.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.6 to 94.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)
Component 2
|
89.1 percentage of participants
Interval 82.7 to 93.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: All the subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and in whom an attempt was made to cross the target lesion with the HT Progress or the HT Pilot guide wires, are included in the ITT population for the guide wire-related analysis.
Successful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on protocol MI (component 2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=138 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)
Component 2
|
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 93.8 to 99.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)
Guide Wire-related Endpoint
|
87.7 percentage of participants
Interval 81.0 to 92.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)
Component 1
|
89.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.6 to 94.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: Angiographically Evaluable Subjects
1. Successful delivery of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter to and across the target lesion and; 2. Successful inflation and deflation of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter and; 3. Absence of clinically significant vessel perforation, flow-limiting vessel dissection, reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) from baseline or clinically significant arrhythmias requiring medical treatment or device intervention following dilatation with MINI-TREK and; 4. Achievement of final TIMI flow 3 for the target lesion at the conclusion of the index procedure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=65 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Angioplasty Predilatation-related: Successful Predilatation of the CTO
|
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 85.0 to 98.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Pre-procedure
|
0.01 mm
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=221 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedure
In-Segment
|
1.85 mm
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
|
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedure
In-Stent
|
2.32 mm
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set.The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure
3
|
0.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure
0
|
95.9 percentage of participants
Interval 92.4 to 98.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure
1
|
3.6 percentage of participants
Interval 1.6 to 7.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure
2
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=221 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure
2
|
1.8 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 4.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure
3
|
97.7 percentage of participants
Interval 94.8 to 99.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure
0
|
0.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure
1
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Achievement of \<50% diameter stenosis within the target lesion segment using assigned study device
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=221 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Device Success
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 98.3 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Device success and absence of in-hospital MACE. Per-protocol MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per protocol definition were categorized as Q-wave (development of new, pathological Q waves on the ECG) or non-Q-wave (elevation of CK levels to greater than two times the upper limit of normal and elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves). Per ARC MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per ARC definition were also categorized as Q-wave (development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads (according to the Minnesota code) with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal) or non-Q-wave (all MIs not classified as Q-wave). ARC defined MIs were further classified as Periprocedural PCI, Periprocedural CABG, Spontaneous, Sudden Death, and Reinfarction based on biomarker and additional criteria and as ST Elevation MI (STEMI) or Non-ST Elevation MI (NSTEMI) based on ST segment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=221 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedure Success
Per Protocol MI definition
|
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 93.0 to 98.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedure Success
Per ARC MI definition
|
89.6 percentage of participants
Interval 84.8 to 93.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=187 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Antegrade Crossing
|
97.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=7 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Subintimal Tracking and Re-entry (STAR) Technique
|
100 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=1 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Knuckle Wire
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=12 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Primary Retrograde Wire Crossing
|
91.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=1 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Controlled Antegrade-Retrograde Technique (CART)
|
100 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=9 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Reverse CART
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set.The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=1 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Kissing Wire Technique
|
100 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=1 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Sub Intimal Technique
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.
Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=5 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Multiple Crossing Techniques
|
80.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Resource Utilization: Procedural Time
|
79.88 Minutes
Standard Deviation 48.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Resource Utilization: Fluoroscopic Time
|
33.61 Minutes
Standard Deviation 23.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT set.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Resource Utilization: Contrast Volume
|
259.00 mL
Standard Deviation 136.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPopulation: ITT Set
Any perforation resulting in hemodynamic instability and/or requiring intervention including pericardiocentesis, embolization, prolonged balloon occlusion, stent graft or comparable therapy
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Perforation
Post Last Mini-Trek Balloon Angiography (n=67)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Perforation
Final Angiography (n=221)
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Perforation
Site reported (n=222)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=219 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=215 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=211 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 720 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 690 days.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=205 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=199 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
37 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=196 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
|
44 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=214 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=210 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=202 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=195 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=191 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Death
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=212 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=208 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=196 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=188 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=181 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=219 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=213 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=209 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=197 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
31 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=188 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
34 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=182 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)
|
37 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=219 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
23 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=213 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=209 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=197 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
27 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=188 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=181 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=212 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=207 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=194 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=185 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=177 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=212 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=207 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=194 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=185 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=177 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=212 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=207 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=194 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=185 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=177 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when any of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=219 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=213 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=209 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=199 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=192 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=186 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
|
36 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=219 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=213 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=209 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=199 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=192 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=186 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Acute (0-24 hours)Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Subacute (>24 hours to 30 days)Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=218 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Late (>30 days to 1 year)Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=206 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=207 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=192 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=182 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=174 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 360 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 330 days
Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion
|
0.0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 720 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 690 days.
Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion
|
0.0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.
Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion
|
0.0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame. The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.
Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 Participants
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion
|
0.0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
CTO Treatment
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 participants at risk
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy mediastinal
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.2%
7/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
9.0%
20/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
2.7%
6/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery dissection
|
2.7%
6/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery thrombosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulseless electrical activity
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Medical device complication
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Thrombosis in device
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chest wall abscess
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cardiac procedure complication
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Coronary artery restenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent coronary artery restenosis
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ureteric anastomosis complication
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac enzymes increased
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephropathy
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal artery stenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory arrest
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic dissection
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Ischaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection bacterial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bone cancer metastatic
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Glioblastoma multiforme
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant palate neoplasm
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary hypertension
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CTO Treatment
n=222 participants at risk
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO:
* XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
* HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization
* MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.6%
8/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.6%
8/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
14.4%
32/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriospasm coronary
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
3.2%
7/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial tachycardia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery dissection
|
8.1%
18/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery perforation
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
3.2%
7/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Cushing's syndrome
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mesenteric artery stenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haematoma
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Retroperitoneal haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Swollen tongue
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haematoma
|
5.9%
13/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
3.2%
7/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site related reaction
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
5.9%
13/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Thrombosis in device
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected cyst
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cardiac procedure complication
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus lesion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular graft occlusion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase MB increased
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac enzymes increased
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac stress test abnormal
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QRS complex abnormal
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen consumption decreased
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Smear cervix abnormal
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Lactic acidosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.7%
6/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Enthesopathy
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc degeneration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint range of motion decreased
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sensation of heaviness
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
5.0%
11/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary hypertension
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriovenous fistula
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.8%
4/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
4.5%
10/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy mediastinal
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block second degree
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
2.7%
6/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery thrombosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
2.3%
5/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulseless electrical activity
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular extrasystoles
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
General disorders
Medical device complication
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chest wall abscess
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection bacterial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Coronary artery restenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
In-stent coronary artery restenosis
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ureteric anastomosis complication
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bone cancer metastatic
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Glioblastoma multiforme
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant palate neoplasm
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
1.4%
3/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephropathy
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal artery stenosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory arrest
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic dissection
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arteriosclerosis
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Ischaemia
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
0.90%
2/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.45%
1/222 • 4 years
ITT set
|
Additional Information
Jennifer M Jones-McMeans, PhD (Associate Director Clinical Research)
Abbott Vascular
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60