Trial Outcomes & Findings for Development of a Behavioral Observer for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT01434030)
NCT ID: NCT01434030
Last Updated: 2014-09-04
Results Overview
The categories below indicate types of information that could be received from a PGASystem and the percentage of participants who stated that they would like to receive this type of information from a PGASystem.
COMPLETED
NA
57 participants
2 hour focus group
2014-09-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Behavioral Observer
Focus group methodology was chosen to obtain qualitative and quantitative data on participants' desire to use glucose advisory systems to manage their diabetes, their concerns about and desired features and functions of these systems, and their perceived confidence with behavioral event recording. At the outset of each interview, the personalized glucose advisory system (PGASystem) was described to participants as a system composed of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device and insulin pump, into which they would input daily information about their insulin, food, and physical activity. The system would then use their data to create personalized algorithms and advice about various aspects of their diabetes management, such as suggestions regarding bolus and basal rate dosing. The interview consisted of open-ended, multiple choice, and dichotomous questions.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
57
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Development of a Behavioral Observer for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Behavioral Observer
n=56 Participants
Behavioral: This is a field study that will investigate behavioral events (e.g. meals, exercise) in T1DM and daily glucose patterns using an insulin pump, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, and frequent SMBG tagged with behavioral markers (recent food and activity). From these data, a learning algorithm - behavioral observer - will be able to track over time key recurrent elements, such as wake-up time, meals, exercise, and daily patterns of risks for hypo- or hyperglycemia. In future controllers, behavioral observation such as this will be used to forecast upcoming routine events, enabling open-loop and closed-loop control algorithms to deal with the probabilistic patterns of patients' self-treatment behavior.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HbA1c
|
7.7 percent glycated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of Diabetes
|
24.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hour focus groupThe categories below indicate types of information that could be received from a PGASystem and the percentage of participants who stated that they would like to receive this type of information from a PGASystem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Observer
n=56 Participants
Focus group methodology was chosen to obtain qualitative and quantitative data on participants' desire to use glucose advisory systems to manage their diabetes, their concerns about and desired features and functions of these systems, and their perceived confidence with behavioral event recording. At the outset of each interview, the personalized glucose advisory system (PGASystem) was described to participants as a system composed of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device and insulin pump, into which they would input daily information about their insulin, food, and physical activity. The system would then use their data to create personalized algorithms and advice about various aspects of their diabetes management, such as suggestions regarding bolus and basal rate dosing. The interview consisted of open-ended, multiple choice, and dichotomous questions.
|
|---|---|
|
Desire to Receive Advice From Personal Glucose Advisory System (PGASystem)
Correction Boluses
|
100 percentage of participants
|
|
Desire to Receive Advice From Personal Glucose Advisory System (PGASystem)
Basal Rates
|
92.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Desire to Receive Advice From Personal Glucose Advisory System (PGASystem)
Meal Boluses/Inuslin to Carb Ratios
|
94.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Desire to Receive Advice From Personal Glucose Advisory System (PGASystem)
Hypoglycemia Risk
|
85.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 hour focus groupThe categories below indicate types of information that could be received from a PGASystem and the percentage of participants who stated that they would follow this type of advice from a PGASystem.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Behavioral Observer
n=56 Participants
Focus group methodology was chosen to obtain qualitative and quantitative data on participants' desire to use glucose advisory systems to manage their diabetes, their concerns about and desired features and functions of these systems, and their perceived confidence with behavioral event recording. At the outset of each interview, the personalized glucose advisory system (PGASystem) was described to participants as a system composed of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device and insulin pump, into which they would input daily information about their insulin, food, and physical activity. The system would then use their data to create personalized algorithms and advice about various aspects of their diabetes management, such as suggestions regarding bolus and basal rate dosing. The interview consisted of open-ended, multiple choice, and dichotomous questions.
|
|---|---|
|
Willingness to Follow PGASystem Advice
Basal Rates
|
44.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Willingness to Follow PGASystem Advice
Correction Boluses
|
53.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Willingness to Follow PGASystem Advice
Meal Boluses
|
60.4 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Behavioral Observer
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place