Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion on the Quality of Recovery of Ambulatory Patients (NCT NCT01433081)

NCT ID: NCT01433081

Last Updated: 2014-04-02

Results Overview

Quality of recovery scores post operative. Scored on a scale of 40 (poor recovery) to 200 (good recovery).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

50 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

24 hours post operative

Results posted on

2014-04-02

Participant Flow

Patients were enrolled consecutively from 2/2011 through 4/2013.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
Administration of magnesium suflate
Placebo
Normal saline infusion
Overall Study
STARTED
25
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
23
23
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

The Effect of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion on the Quality of Recovery of Ambulatory Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
n=25 Participants
Administration of magnesium suflate
Placebo
n=25 Participants
.9 normal saline infusion
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15 • n=5 Participants
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=7 Participants
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.01 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
n=5 Participants
25 participants
n=7 Participants
50 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 hours post operative

Population: Two drop outs for either arm were removed from analysis.

Quality of recovery scores post operative. Scored on a scale of 40 (poor recovery) to 200 (good recovery).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
n=23 Participants
Administration of magnesium suflate
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Normal saline infusion
Quality of Recovery Scores Post Operative
183 units on scale 40 (low) - 200 (high)
Interval 173.0 to 188.0
159 units on scale 40 (low) - 200 (high)
Interval 153.0 to 175.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 hours

Opioid consumption after discharge

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
n=23 Participants
Administration of magnesium suflate
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Normal saline infusion
Opioid Consumption
10 miligram morphine equivalents
Interval 0.0 to 20.0
30 miligram morphine equivalents
Interval 20.0 to 40.0

Adverse Events

Magnesium Sulfate Infusion

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Magnesium Sulfate Infusion
n=23 participants at risk
Administration of magnesium suflate
Placebo
n=23 participants at risk
.9 normal saline infusion
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
30.4%
7/23 • Number of events 10 • 24 hours
Nausea in the post operative period
43.5%
10/23 • Number of events 10 • 24 hours
Nausea in the post operative period
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • 24 hours
Nausea in the post operative period
26.1%
6/23 • Number of events 6 • 24 hours
Nausea in the post operative period

Additional Information

Gildasio De Oliveira MD

Northwestern University

Phone: 312-472-3573

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place