Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of Besivance™ for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children (NCT NCT01431170)
NCT ID: NCT01431170
Last Updated: 2016-07-14
Results Overview
The NLDO grading scale in the study eye at every visit. The scale ranges from 0 to +4: * 0: No tearing and discharge. * 1: Tearing, moderate mucous discharge around nasolacrimal punctum * 2: Moderate redness of the medial eyelid with mucous discharge * 3: Redness and swelling of the eyelid with mucopurulent discharge * 4: Redness and swelling of eyelid with purulent discharge Due to varying baseline severity (measured by NLDO grade) among subjects, change from baseline to week 8 in NLDO grade was further classified as the following: Treatment success: grade of 0 or improvement by 2 or more compared to the prior visit. Recurrence: NLDO with infection returns in the study eye, as indicated by a NLDO grade \>0 after a grade of 0 at the prior visit. Treatment Failure: grade is worse than or same as the baseline visit.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
24 participants
Baseline to Week 8
2016-07-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
Subjects receive Besivance™ ophthalmic suspension, 0.6% one drop in the study eye three times daily for 10 days.
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
Subjects receive Polytrim ophthalmic solution one drop in the study eye three times daily for 10 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
9
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of Besivance™ for Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=12 Participants
Subjects received Besivance™ ophthalmic suspension, 0.6% one drop in the study eye three times daily (TID) for 10 days.
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=12 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution one drop in the study eye three times daily (TID) for 10 days.
|
Total
n=24 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
110.83 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 93.05 • n=5 Participants
|
158.58 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 110.62 • n=7 Participants
|
134.71 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 102.90 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8The NLDO grading scale in the study eye at every visit. The scale ranges from 0 to +4: * 0: No tearing and discharge. * 1: Tearing, moderate mucous discharge around nasolacrimal punctum * 2: Moderate redness of the medial eyelid with mucous discharge * 3: Redness and swelling of the eyelid with mucopurulent discharge * 4: Redness and swelling of eyelid with purulent discharge Due to varying baseline severity (measured by NLDO grade) among subjects, change from baseline to week 8 in NLDO grade was further classified as the following: Treatment success: grade of 0 or improvement by 2 or more compared to the prior visit. Recurrence: NLDO with infection returns in the study eye, as indicated by a NLDO grade \>0 after a grade of 0 at the prior visit. Treatment Failure: grade is worse than or same as the baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=11 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physician-rated Scale of NLDO From Baseline to Follow-Up Visit at Week 8 or From Baseline to Time of Treatment Failure, if Earlier.
Number of Treatment Success
|
7 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Change in Physician-rated Scale of NLDO From Baseline to Follow-Up Visit at Week 8 or From Baseline to Time of Treatment Failure, if Earlier.
Number of Recurrence
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Change in Physician-rated Scale of NLDO From Baseline to Follow-Up Visit at Week 8 or From Baseline to Time of Treatment Failure, if Earlier.
Number of Treatment Failure
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit )Population: The overall study recurrence rate was 10% study-wide (2 of 20 subjects), with one Besivance subject (11%), and one Polytrim subject (9%) experiencing recurrence.
Recurrence is defined as when the NLDO with infection in the subject's study eye returns, as indicated by a NLDO grading scale of greater than zero after achieving a grade of zero at the previous visit. Number of subjects who had a recurrence event of the subjects who completed the study by treatment Group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=11 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Recurrences by Randomization Group
|
1 Recurrence Subjects
|
1 Recurrence Subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit)Subjects who experience recurrence were re-treated as if they were a new patient, with the same study medication, were followed up then classified as "Treatment Success" or "Treatment Failure" according to study protocol.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=1 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=1 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy of Recurrence Treatment as Measured by Change in the Physician- Rated Scale of NLDO
Number of Treatment Failure after Recurrence
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Efficacy of Recurrence Treatment as Measured by Change in the Physician- Rated Scale of NLDO
Number of Treatment Success after Recurrence
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the time of failure or Week 16 (Closeout Visit)Possible treatment failure at a follow-up examination is operationally defined as follows: if the physician-grading scale of NLDO is worse than or same as the prior visit at any given follow-up visit, possible treatment failure then exists. Treatment Failure occurred if at visit #1 (2-week visit), the physician-grading scale of NLDO is worse than or same as the baseline visit. Treatment failure can also occur at recurrence visit #1 if the NLDO grading scale is worse or the same as compared to the previous visit. Subjects who meet the criteria for treatment failure were withdrawn from the study by the principal investigator and no additional data was collected. Subjects were referred for continued care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=11 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Failure
|
1 Number of Treatment Failures
|
1 Number of Treatment Failures
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (Closeout Visit )Population: No safety issues were reported
During each study visit, the Principal Investigator will evaluate any possible adverse events by assessing clinical complaints and symptoms that are experienced by subjects and observed by the parent(s)/legal guardian(s), including findings in external, lacrimal duct system and anterior segment using slit lamp and fundus exam using indirect ophthalmoscope by principal investigator, as well as clinical signs including findings in external, nasolacrimal duct system and anterior segment using slit lamp and fundus exam using indirect ophthalmoscope by principal investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=11 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Medication Safety Outcomes
|
0 Number of Adverse Events
|
0 Number of Adverse Events
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16 (Close-Out Visit)Treatment Success is defined as a grade of 0 or improvement by 2 or more compared to the prior visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Besivance Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Subjects received Besivance ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times a day for ten days
|
Polytrim Treatment Group
n=11 Participants
Subjects received Polytrim ophthalmic solution in the study eye, one drop three times daily for ten days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects Treated Successfully at Close-Out Visit (Week 16)
|
8 Number of Treatment Success
|
10 Number of Treatment Success
|
Adverse Events
Besivance Treatment Group
Polytrim Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place