Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole

NCT ID: NCT01429441

Last Updated: 2016-03-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion / (VMT) including macular hole with ocriplasmin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present study is designed to assess anatomical and functional outcomes following a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin 0.125mg in subjects with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)/ (VMT) including macular hole.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ocriplasmin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ocriplasmin

Intervention Type DRUG

0.125 mg single intravitreal injection

Sham injection

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ocriplasmin

0.125 mg single intravitreal injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Sham injection

Sham injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects 18 years of age or older and of either gender
* Presence of vitreomacular adhesion
* Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/32 or worse in study eye
* BCVA of 20/800 or better in the non-study eye

Exclusion Criteria

* History or current evidence of proliferative retinopathy, exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or retinal vein occlusion in the study eye
* Any vitreous hemorrhage or any other vitreous opacification which precludes the visualization of the posterior pole by visual inspection OR adequate assessment of the macula by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in the study eye
* Macular hole of \> 400 µm diameter in the study eye
* Presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM)
* Aphakia in the study eye
* High myopia (more than 8D) in study eye
* History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in either eye
* History of vitrectomy in the study eye
* Previous participation in this trial or prior administration of ocriplasmin in the study eye
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ThromboGenics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Retinal Consultants of Arizona

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants Medical Group

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

West Coast Retina Group, Inc

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Retina Associates

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

MedEye Associates

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Center for Retina and Macular Disease

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Associated Retinal Consultants

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sabates Eye Center Research

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Eyesite Opthalmic Services, PA

Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Retina-Vitreous Center, PA

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Retina Association of NJ

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Retina Vitrous Surgeons of CNY

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Southeast Clinical Research, PA

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Eye Institute

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Retina Associates of Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mid Atlantic Retina

Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Research Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants, PA

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Vitroretinal Consultants

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Valley Retina Institute, P.A.

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Eye Care Associate

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Velaga SB, Nittala MG, Ip MS, Duchateau L, Sadda SR. Post hoc analysis of ellipsoid zone changes beyond the central subfield in symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion patients from the OASIS trial. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 21;6(1):e000648. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000648. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34250257 (View on PubMed)

Yu TM, Dugel PU, Haller JA, Kaiser PK, Arnold RJ. Budget impact analysis of ocriplasmin for the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion in the USA. J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Dec;7(12):1195-1207. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0057. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30350717 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TG-MV-014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.