Targeted Disc Decompression (TDD) for Contained Herniated Lumbar Discs

NCT ID: NCT01429363

Last Updated: 2016-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prospective Clinical Series (CS) aims to prove the hypothesis that Targeted Disc Decompression (TDD) reduces the pain in patients suffering from radicular leg pain secondary to a contained focal disc protrusion (Lumboradicular Syndrome). Secondary objective will be to prove that the treatment Group will have less disability and better quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will start with a prospective clinical series (CS) in which 20 patients after careful selection will be treated with TDD, followed by a standardized rehabilitation program. After the diagnosis Lumboradicular syndrome the patient will first receive an transforaminal epidural injection at the site and level of the herniated disc, proven on MRI. Two weeks after the epidural injection the patient is evaluated. When the response is negative (a decrease less than 2.5 points on the 10 points VAS scale) TDD can be performed. Patient outcome will be evaluated at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the study intervention. End point of this study is 3 months after TDD treatment. A positive response is defined as a minimal decrease of 2.5 points on the 10 points VAS scale compared to the VAS score at baseline.

A positive response in at least seven patients and acceptable side-effects and complications will lead to the start of a RCT.

If the response is positive \< 7 out of 20 patients, the decision to proceed with a RCT following the prospective CS is made after evaluation of the CS by a team of experts. The results from this prospective study will be published.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spine Disc Herniation

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

contained herniated lumbar discs TDD Case series RCT

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Targeted disc decompression

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Targeted disc decompression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Targeted disc catheter is connected to Neurotherm TDD unit and heating protocol is started.In this heating protocol temperature gradually increases from 65C to 90C during a time period of 12 minutes;

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Targeted disc decompression

The Targeted disc catheter is connected to Neurotherm TDD unit and heating protocol is started.In this heating protocol temperature gradually increases from 65C to 90C during a time period of 12 minutes;

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mono radicular leg pain for at least 6 weeks as a result from a lumbar contained herniated disc. Leg pain must be of greater impact then concomitant back-pain
* Failing conservative treatment; analgesics and/or physical therapy ( WHO 1-3). Failing means persisting pain leading to problems with daily activities.

Exclusion Criteria

* Negative response to a transforaminal epidural injection. Injection must be performed \< 6 weeks before start treatment but least 2 weeks before start treatment
* Neurological investigation by neurologist. Symptoms should be clinical related to the disc herniation level.
* Age \>18 and \< 50 years
* Mean pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) \>50 mm (0 -100)


* Herniated disc with more then 33% obliteration of the spinal channel.
* Annulus rupture with sequestrated herniated disc.
* Pain on VAS below 50 mm
* Pain existing longer then one year
* Less then 50% preserved disc height
* Conflict with social security/insurance
* Major motor impairment as a result of the herniation, paresis gr 3 MRC or more
* Other degenerative causes of nerve root compression; ligament flavum or facet joint hypertrophy, degenerative spinal channel stenosis, loss of lumbar kyphosis, discopathy with signs of Schmorls' nodules and loss of nucleus pulposus signal. Other causes of radicular syndrome such as cancer, radiculitis or neural degeneration.
* Spinal instability (spondylolisthesis, spinal fracture or tumor)
* History of back surgery, chemonucleolysis or other intra discal procedures
* Coagulopathies or oral anti-coagula therapy
* Infection
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NeuroTherm

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rijnstate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

JW Kallewaard, Drs.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rijnsate Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Diakonessenhuis

Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Site Status

Rijnland Ziekenhuis

Leiderdorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LTC 760-220411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id