Comparison of Constant Current to Constant Voltage Stimulation in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

NCT ID: NCT01423565

Last Updated: 2015-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

HYPOTHESIS: Constant current stimulation for STN DBS will allow better and more stable control of Parkinson's disease symptoms than constant voltage stimulation.

Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Two types of implantable pulse generators (IPGs) are available, differing on whether voltage or electrical current is controlled. Constant current IPGs provide a specific electrical current and will automatically adjust the voltage depending on the impedance, while the current applied by constant voltage IPGs will depend on the tissue impedance that may change over time. No study has compared the clinical differences of these two electronic modalities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for neurological and psychiatric disorders, being one of the most important therapies in functional neurosurgery to date. Class I evidence shows that subthalamic nucleus stimulation (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is more effective than the best medical therapy (1,2). Globus pallidus internus stimulation for primary dystonia has an improvement rate of up to 70%(4) and is considered the main surgical treatment for this pathology. Symptom improvement in essential tremor is well documented. Pain, epilepsy, psychiatric disorders such as Tourette syndrome, obsessive - compulsive disorder and depression are promising applications of DBS. Obesity, memory improvement, aggressiveness, drug addiction, minimal conscious state and hypertension are areas of continuing investigation as potential applications of DBS.

The clinical effects of DBS result from the delivery of electrical charge to brain tissue. The way this electrical charge is delivered depends on the electronics of implantable pulse generators (IPGs). IPGs apply pulses of electrical stimulation in which voltage or current increases from zero to a maximum value for a period of time (order of tens of microseconds) and then returns to zero.

There are two types IPGs , differing on whether voltage or electrical current is controlled (3).

1. Constant - voltage IPGs: in this type of IPG there is control over the maximum voltage associated with each pulse. The maximum current will vary depending on the impedance. A specific voltage is programmed. The amount of electrical current delivered with a constant voltage depends on the impedance of the tissue and the electrodes. Thus, the voltage will not indicate how much electrical current is given; the resistance will determine this parameter.
2. Constant - current IPGs: provide a specific electrical current and will automatically adjust the voltage depending on the impedance. The strength of stimulation will remain the same regardless of changes in the impedance. The difference in impedances on each electrode and the intersubject variability in impedances will not alter the electrical current by modifying the voltage.

Until fairly recently, only constant voltage IPG's have been available for use. A newer generation of IPG's have been available for more than a year that can provide either constant voltage or constant current according to physician and patient preference. There is no evidence yet to support the preferential use of one modality over the other.

IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY Following DBS electrode implantation, the impedances within the same patient can vary widely. Surgical implantation changes tissue impedance, being usually higher immediately after surgery. In this case the patient will require higher electrical currents. After the initial tissue reaction subsides, the reduction of impedance will generate an increase of the charge density. For this reason it is commonplace to wait at least 2 weeks after electrode implantation before programming the IPG.

Furthermore, different contacts on the same DBS lead can have widely varying impedances. Effects or side effects associated with stimulation of one electrode contact often cannot be applied to a different contact on the same DBS lead in the same patient because the impedances may differ.

The range of impedances that can be measured will depend on the choice of voltage. In some patients, the voltage used therapeutically may not be enough to allow an accurate measure of the impedances, causing confusion regarding the structural and electrical integrity of the IPG.

For all the above mentioned factors, the clinical results in patients with constant - voltage IPGs will depend on the experience of the operator to deal with the different aspects related to tissue and electrode impedances to achieve the desired current. The electronic properties of constant - current IPGs allows the system to make voltage adjustments in order to maintain the desired current and the subsequent clinical effect. This has been the theoretical background for the development of constant current IPG's; whether or not this theory is true in practice is the subject of this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson's Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Deep Brain Stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deep Brain Stimulation (Medtronic, Activa PC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Following subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation patients will be randomized to receive either constant current or constant voltage stimulation and subsequently "crossed over" to receive the other type of stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deep Brain Stimulation (Medtronic, Activa PC)

Following subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation patients will be randomized to receive either constant current or constant voltage stimulation and subsequently "crossed over" to receive the other type of stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Medtronic Activa PC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease
* Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hadassah Medical Organization

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Israel Zvi

Dr. Zvi Israel, Director, Functional Neurosurgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zvi Israel, MBBS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hadassah Medical Organization

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hadassah University Hospital

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

386150-HMO-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Closed Loop DBS Implanted RC+S Study
NCT03815656 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA