Blood Pressure in Dialysis Patients

NCT ID: NCT01421771

Last Updated: 2023-11-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Although studies in the general population have demonstrated a continuous reduction in CV risk with each mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP), multiple observational studies conducted in hemodialysis (HD) patients have demonstrated that patients with mild to moderate hypertension may have decreased mortality compared to those with normal blood pressure (BP). The investigators recently reported that among HD patients, those with routine pre-dialysis BP values that met the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines (\<140/90 mm Hg) had increased mortality compared to patients with mild to moderate hypertension. However, these observational studies included untreated patients in whom low or normal BP may reflect significant cardiac disease or other comorbid conditions. In the setting of reduced vascular compliance and impaired autoregulation, aggressive BP lowering may decrease coronary or cerebral perfusion. Thus, it is unclear if aggressive BP lowering will be harmful or beneficial. A well-designed randomized control trial (RCT) is needed to answer this important question. Prior to conducting a full-scale RCT it is prudent to conduct a pilot study to assess feasibility and inform the design of the former. The investigators propose to conduct a pilot RCT in a prevalent cohort of HD patients to assess the safety and feasibility of treating patients to a low (110-140 mmHg)and standard (155-165) mm Hg pre-dialysis BP target.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mortality and morbidity among hemodialysis (HD) patients remain unacceptably high, thus there is a compelling need to improve clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Improvement program (KDOQI) has published a guideline calling for a pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<140 mmHg in HD patients. However, the evidence supporting this guideline was graded as weak since it was largely extrapolated from the general population. Studies in the general population have demonstrated a continuous reduction in cardiovascular risk with each mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP), extending below levels that were in past considered "normal". The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) study has showed a decrease in the composite outcome of CV events and CV mortality among non-diabetic patients at high risk for cardiovascular events by targeting a SBP of \<120 mmHg. It is reasonable to postulate that intensive control of BP may be beneficial in HD patients, who in many ways resemble patients in SPRINT except that they have progressed to end stage renal disease. Thus, it is timely to propose conducting a RCT of intensive versus standard control of blood pressure in HD patients.

The investigators recognize that from observational studies suggest that mortality among HD patients may be increased among patients who meet the current KDOQI guideline. Unidentified confounders may have contributed to these surprising findings. The conclusions reached by observational studies in HD patients have often been refuted by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Therefore, a RCT is needed to determine if a pre-dialysis SBP \<140 mmHg specified by KDOQI is an appropriate target. Prior to beginning a full-scale-RCT, it is imperative to conduct a pilot study to demonstrate safety and efficacy and to inform the design of the full-scale study. The pilot study is designed to answer the following questions:

1. What are the estimated recruitment, accrual and retention rates?
2. What proportions of patients in each arm will achieve and maintain SBP within the assigned target and will the investigators achieve equal or greater than 10mmHg separation in the average SBP between the two arms?
3. What are the anticipated adverse and serious adverse events rates within the intensive and standard arms?
4. What end points should be used in the full-scale trial?
5. What blood pressure (BP) measurements e.g., routine dialysis unit BP (RDUBPM), standardized dialysis unit BP (SDUBPM), standardized home BP (HBPM) or ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to guide therapy? Although SDUBPM, HBPM and ABPM may be more powerful than RDUBP in predicting clinical outcomes,long term adherence with these techniques has not been demonstrated.

Specific Aims

1. Establish procedures for SDUBPM, HBPM and ABPM and web-based data entry.
2. Recruit and randomize patients into two treatment arms with target pre-dialysis SDUSBPM values \<140 and \< 160 mmHg and measure recruitment, accrual, and dropout rates in each arm.
3. Assess the feasibility of attaining and maintaining these targets and the degree of SBP separation achieved during a one year intervention.
4. Measure adherence rates for obtaining protocol SDUBPM, HBPM and ABPM over the one-year intervention.
5. Assess the safety of treating participants to the study's SBP targets by measuring occurrence rates of CVD and non-CVD morbidity and mortality and other adverse and serious adverse events in each arm.
6. Compare the differences in changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMI), aortic pulse wave velocity(APWV), and aortic distensibility, respectively, between the two study arms.
7. Conduct statistical analyses to inform the design of the full-scale study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension Renal Failure Chronic Requiring Hemodialysis Blood Pressure Dialysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment to an intensive BP goal

Treatment to a pre-dialysis standardized dialysis unit systolic blood pressure of 110-140 mm Hg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antihypertensive Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Study formulary consists of ACE/ARB, Beta Adrenergic Blocker, Calcium Channel Blocker, vasodilators, peripheral alpha antagonist and central alpha agonist.

ACE I or ARB is first line, the order of addition of subsequent medications is per the discretion of the investigator

Dry weight Challenge

Intervention Type OTHER

Reduce the estimated dry weight of the patient's progressively over 2 -week intervals until the dry weight challenge is no longer tolerated or the patient is at BP goal

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Treatment to standard BP goal

Treatment to a pre-dialysis Standardized dialysis unit systolic BP of 155-165 mm Hg

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Antihypertensive Agents

Intervention Type DRUG

Study formulary consists of ACE/ARB, Beta Adrenergic Blocker, Calcium Channel Blocker, vasodilators, peripheral alpha antagonist and central alpha agonist.

ACE I or ARB is first line, the order of addition of subsequent medications is per the discretion of the investigator

Dry weight Challenge

Intervention Type OTHER

Reduce the estimated dry weight of the patient's progressively over 2 -week intervals until the dry weight challenge is no longer tolerated or the patient is at BP goal

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Antihypertensive Agents

Study formulary consists of ACE/ARB, Beta Adrenergic Blocker, Calcium Channel Blocker, vasodilators, peripheral alpha antagonist and central alpha agonist.

ACE I or ARB is first line, the order of addition of subsequent medications is per the discretion of the investigator

Intervention Type DRUG

Dry weight Challenge

Reduce the estimated dry weight of the patient's progressively over 2 -week intervals until the dry weight challenge is no longer tolerated or the patient is at BP goal

Intervention Type OTHER

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Extend dialysis treatment time and re-challenge estimated dry weight

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years
2. On thrice weekly maintenance hemodialysis for greater than 90 days
3. For entry into baseline period: 2-week average RDUSBPM \> 155 mm Hg on AHT medications or \< 155 mm Hg on ≥ 1 AHT medications For randomization: 2-week average SDUSBPM ≥ 155 mm Hg

Exclusion Criteria

1. Two- week average, pre-dialysis mid-week SDUSBPM ≥180 mmHg on maximal doses of ≥ 4 antihypertensive agents;
2. Inability to measure blood pressures in an upper arm;
3. History of inter or post-dialytic hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg) within the past 2 weeks or inter- or post- dialytic hypotension requiring hospitalization (including emergency room visit) and/or the use of midodrine in the past 6 months;
4. Required one or more urgent, unscheduled dialysis treatment for congestive heart failure in the past 3 months (other than in an incident patient at the time of starting dialysis);
5. Acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina or stroke/ TIA in past three the 3 months;
6. Severe aortic valve stenosis (valve area \<1cm 2) carotid artery stenosis (\>70% stenosis);
7. Known abdominal aortic aneurysm \>5 cm in diameter or thoracic aortic aneurysm of any diameter;
8. Body mass index \>40 kg/m2 or arm circumference \> 52 cm, which precludes measuring blood pressure with the "thigh" blood pressure cuff;
9. Life expectancy \<1 year;
10. A living donor, kidney transplant, or switch to peritoneal dialysis scheduled within the next year;
11. Significant cognitive impairment;
12. spKt/V ≤1.2 in the past 2 months;
13. Active liver disease;
14. Active alcohol or substance abuse including narcotics within the past year;
15. Contraindication to cardiac MRI;
16. Current or planned pregnancy within the next year;
17. Unwillingness to consent to pregnancy test and/or use of birth control if of childbearing potential;
18. Suspicion that the participant will not be willing or able to adhere to prescribed medications and study protocol;
19. Incarcerated;
20. Significant concern about the study expressed by spouse, significant other, family member primary nephrologist or primary care physician;
21. Participation in another intervention study;
22. Unable to speak or understand English or Spanish;
23. Plan to relocate within one year;
24. participation in another intervention study .
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tufts Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Case Western Reserve University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of New Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philip Zager, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University New Mexico

Dana Miskulin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tufts Medical Center

Jennifer Gassman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

David Ploth, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Manisha Jhamb

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Mahboob Rahman

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Case Western Reserve University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

DaVita Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Walden Pond Clinic

Concord, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Faulkner

Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Somerville

Somerville, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Albuquerque

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Albuquerque South

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Albuquerque East

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Grants

Grants, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Rio Rancho

Rio Rancho, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Centers for Dialysis Care East

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Centers for Dialysis Care - Shaker Heights

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Oakland

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Banksville

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Point Breeze

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - North Hills

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Magnolia Court

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - West Ashley

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - James Island

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - East Cooper

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dialysis Clinic Inc - Azalea Place

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Miskulin DC, Gassman J, Schrader R, Gul A, Jhamb M, Ploth DW, Negrea L, Kwong RY, Levey AS, Singh AK, Harford A, Paine S, Kendrick C, Rahman M, Zager P. BP in Dialysis: Results of a Pilot Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jan;29(1):307-316. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017020135. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29212839 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01DK083424-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link