Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Drainage Study

NCT ID: NCT01420978

Last Updated: 2013-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When patients suffer a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding around the brain), they often develop hydrocephalus. This is an enlargement of the fluid-filled spaces (ventricles) in the brain. Standard-of-care treatment includes placing an external ventricular drain (EVD) to drain off fluid. Eventually the EVD is weaned with the goal of removing it. Occasionally a patient does not tolerate this and a permanent surgery needs to be done to internalize a shunt.

Though this is done commonly and routinely throughout the world, there are no good studies to address how to optimally set the EVD level and how fast to wean it. Most set the EVD to a level of around 15 mmHg. The investigators hypothesize that setting the EVD lower (which will allow higher volume Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) drainage through the EVD) will improve perfusion at the level of the microcirculation in the brain, and result in improved neurologic outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High volume CSF diversion

The EVD will be set to an initial level of 5 mmHg. The drain will remain in place at a level of ≤ 5 mmHg until at least day 10 after SAH before a weaning trial is attempted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CSF Diversion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CSF drainage

Conventional CSF diversion

The EVD will be set to a level of 15 mmHg for as long as needed for the treatment of hydrocephalus, and subsequently weaned at the discretion of the treating physician. Lowering the level of the EVD can be considered by the treating physician if sustained intracranial hypertension occurs

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CSF Diversion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CSF drainage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CSF Diversion

CSF drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Diagnosis of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), confirmed with noncontrast head CT
* SAH is suspected to be aneurysmal in source
* Clinical management requires placement of EVD within 2 days of suspected time of hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* SAH of traumatic or non-aneurysmal etiology
* Patients treated with lumbar drains
* EVD placement ≥ 3 days after suspected time of hemorrhage
* Known contraindication to induction of relative intracranial hypotension (e.g. acute subdural hematoma)
* Pre-morbid mRS ≥ 3
* EVD that is suboptimally placed by CT obtained after EVD placement (i.e. EVD not in the ventricular system)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giuseppe Lanzino

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Lanzino, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-002713

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Tilburg Vasospasm Study
NCT01407614 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3