Comparison of Noninvasive Blood Glucose Concentrations Relative to Finger Capillary Blood Glucose References

NCT ID: NCT01415544

Last Updated: 2012-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to prospectively evaluate a noninvasive, near-infrared based method for measuring glucose concentration relative to invasive blood reference measurements. The initial phase of the study will be focused on procurement of the data needed to develop a robust, accurate calibration. The second phase will be focused on performance evaluation of the system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Currently, individuals with diabetes must use an invasive finger stick methodology for the determination of their blood glucose levels. Although current technology glucose meters use a smaller amount of blood than older generation meters, the pain and inconvenience associated with this invasive measurement is the number one reason cited for inadequate or infrequent blood glucose monitoring. In fact up to 67% of patients with diabetes fail to routinely monitor their blood glucose levels. A survey of 1895 patients showed that finger soreness was the most common reason given for self-reported noncompliance with testing recommendations, followed by pain, inconvenience, fear of needles, and "other" (including cost), (Diabetes Care August 2001 vol. 24 no. 8 1502-1503). The ability to make a painless blood glucose measurement using only light would address the pain and inconvenience issues associated with current technology glucose meters.

The initial application of the technology is associated with the monitoring of Gestational Diabetes. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recently released recommendations for diagnosing gestational diabetes, as well as clarifying the benefits of treatment (Diabetes Care, 2010;33:676-682). The IADPSG cited research that found significant graded relationships between increasing maternal glucose levels and the frequency of four primary and five secondary outcomes. For example, with a 1-standard deviation increase in maternal fasting, 1-hour, and 2-hour plasma glucose levels, there was a corresponding 38%, 46%, and 38% increased risk, respectively, in the primary outcome of birth weight \>90th percentile, and a 5%, 18%, and 16% increased risk, respectively, of the secondary outcome of premature delivery before 37 weeks gestation (N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991-2002).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes Type 2 Diabetes Gestational Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Type 2 Diabetes

Those previously diagnosed with type 2 diabetes

No interventions assigned to this group

Type 1 Diabetes

Those previously diagnosed with type 1 diabetes

No interventions assigned to this group

Gestational Diabetes

Those that are currently diagnosed with gestational diabetes

No interventions assigned to this group

Healthy Human Volunteers

Those that have not been diagnosed with any type of diabetes

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female at least 20 years of age but not older than 50 years of age
* Female with Type I or Gestational diabetes based on ADA criteria
* Female with Type II diabetes and A1c of greater than 7.0 as measured on a Bayer A1C Now meter
* May include female healthy volunteers.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject requires hemo-dialysis
* Severe heart disease as evidenced by peripheral edema
* Liver disease as evidenced by jaundice
* Active alcohol or drug abuse
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2
* Hand size too large to fit in the optical measurement instrumentation
* Middle finger width of less than 5 mm
* Skin damage at optical sampling site on hand
* Currently taking prednisone or other systemic steroids
* Tattoo at the optical sampling site
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

InLight Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Walter Forman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lovelace Scientific Resources

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lovelace Scientific Resources

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-0020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.