Electromagnetic Tracking of Devices During Biopsy Procedures
NCT ID: NCT01403727
Last Updated: 2013-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-11-30
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will compare the use of electromagnetic tracking and image guidance (CT) during biopsy procedures verses the typical CT image guided procedure alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electromagnetic Tracking of Devices During Interventional Procedures
NCT01279148
Effectiveness and Safety of CT-guided Needle Placement in the Liver With the Aid of the ActiSight Needle Guidance System
NCT01367392
Healthy Volunteer Visibility Study of Micromachined Tags for the Detection of Surgical Sponges
NCT02009566
Comparing Xperguide vs. Conventional Methods During Percutaneous Image Guided Procedures
NCT01287013
Lymphedema Sensor Technology Development Study
NCT06778837
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures with respect to:
* Total procedure time
* Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
* Number of needle passes
* Target registration error (TRE- distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan))
The study will consist of 50 patients from 1 site. The expected completion time for enrollment is 3 months, but will depend on the ability of the clinic to enroll patients. There are two arms in the study. An Unassisted Biopsy Control arm (physician and patient blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav system) and Assisted Biopsy (Physician not blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav). Patients will be randomized to each arm.
The PercuNav provides real-time, three-dimensional visualization and navigation tools for all stages of diagnosis and surgery including pre-procedure planning and intra-procedure navigation. PercuNav transforms two-dimensional patient images (scan sets), derived from CT, PET/CT and MRI into dynamic representations on which a tool can be navigated and fused with ultrasound. The system performs spatial mapping from one image space to another image space or from image space to physical space (registration) allowing the physician to correlate scan sets with each other and to the patient.
For this trial, each patient will have a pre-procedure CT image set of the area of interest. The image set should display the patient in the same position that the biopsy will be performed in, although not requisite.
Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP (Physician blinded to PercuNav system):
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded by pushing the start button again.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP:
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path and another screen capture will be taken. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
The primary study objective is to quantify, in terms of a point estimate and confidence interval, the treatment effect which characterizes the mean difference in number of CT scans between the "unassisted" CT and "assisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures. More specifically, the goal will be to show with 95% Confidence that the "assisted" CT procedure leads to 3 fewer scans, on average, than the "unassisted" CT group during guided liver biopsies.
H0: uT - aT \< 3 scans HA: uT - aT \>= 3 scans uT = mean number of scans during "unassisted" CT procedure aT = mean number of scans during "assisted" CT procedure Equivalently, the desired superiority will have been demonstrated whenever the lower 95% confidence limit on the difference, "unassisted" CT minus "assisted" CT, exceeds 3 scans.
Primary Endpoint and Objective:
The primary endpoint for this study is the number of CT radiation exposure scans received during the course of a CT guided liver biopsy procedure. The primary study objective is to characterize the difference in the number of scans received between the "assisted" and the "unassisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures.
The primary measure that will be assessed and quantified is any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided liver biopsies with respect to radiation dose.
The secondary measures that will be assessed and quantified are any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided procedures with respect to:
* Total procedure time
* Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP
Routine biopsy needle placement and Physician blinded to needle location
No interventions assigned to this group
Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP
The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Is over the age of 18;
3. Has the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and complies with the protocol;
4. Has the ability to follow procedural instructions, including, but not limited to, holding their breath and remaining reasonably motionless during the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has an adhesive allergy (due to the application of active fiducials with adhesive backing);
3. Has a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator;
4. Has a gross body weight above 180lbs for women and 260lbs for men;
5. Is pregnant
A patient may be excluded after enrollment if any of the following criteria are met:
1\. The patient's health and/or safety become jeopardized for any reason making it unsafe to continue; 2. Technical errors and/or difficulties; 3. Any reasonable rationale put forth by the physician or investigator 4. Lost to follow up - In-evaluable data
\-
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philips Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward Kim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010_MtSinai_BiopTrial_V2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.