Participant Preference of Subcutaneous (SC) Versus Intravenous (IV) Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER) 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01401166

Last Updated: 2017-03-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

488 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, open-label, crossover study will evaluate participants' preference and healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction with SC versus IV Herceptin administration in HER2-positive early breast cancer. Participants will be randomized to receive either SC Herceptin or IV Herceptin every 3 weeks for Cycles 1 to 4, followed by crossover to the other treatment administration for Cycles 5 to 8. For up to 10 additional cycles (for a total of 18 cycles), participants will receive IV or SC Herceptin every 3 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1: SC (SID) then IV Herceptin

Participants will receive Herceptin on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 18 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 4 of the crossover period, SC Herceptin will be administered via single-use injection device (SID), and during Cycles 5 to 8, IV Herceptin will be given. In the continuation period, participants will receive IV Herceptin for up to 10 remaining cycles. Administration will be performed by HCP. Those with at least 2 treatment cycles remaining of the 18-cycle treatment course after the crossover period will be offered the opportunity to self-administer SC Herceptin via SID under the direction of a trained HCP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herceptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 milligrams (mg) for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Single-Use Injection Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The SID will be used, containing Herceptin 600 mg per 5 milliliters (mL).

Cohort 1: IV then SC (SID) Herceptin

Participants will receive Herceptin on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 18 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 4 of the crossover period, IV Herceptin will be given, and during Cycles 5 to 8, SC Herceptin will be administered via SID. In the continuation period, participants will receive IV Herceptin for up to 10 remaining cycles. Administration will be performed by HCP. Those with at least 2 treatment cycles remaining of the 18-cycle treatment course after the crossover period will be offered the opportunity to self-administer SC Herceptin via SID under the direction of a trained HCP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herceptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 mg/kg for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 mg for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Single-Use Injection Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The SID will be used, containing Herceptin 600 mg per 5 mL.

Cohort 2: SC (Vial) then IV Herceptin

Participants will receive Herceptin on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 18 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 4 of the crossover period, SC Herceptin will be administered via handheld syringe using the vial formulation, and during Cycles 5 to 8, IV Herceptin will be given. In the continuation period, participants will receive SC Herceptin via handheld syringe using the vial formulation for up to 10 remaining cycles. Administration will be performed by HCP throughout the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herceptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 mg/kg for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 mg for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Cohort 2: IV then SC (Vial) Herceptin

Participants will receive Herceptin on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 18 cycles. During Cycles 1 to 4 of the crossover period, IV Herceptin will be given, and during Cycles 5 to 8, SC Herceptin will be administered via handheld syringe using the vial formulation. In the continuation period, participants will receive SC Herceptin via handheld syringe using the vial formulation for up to 10 remaining cycles. Administration will be performed by HCP throughout the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Herceptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 mg/kg for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 mg for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Herceptin

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 milligrams (mg) for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Intervention Type DRUG

Herceptin

Herceptin will be given on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle for a total of 18 cycles. If study treatment for Cycle 1 is IV Herceptin, the initial dose will be a loading dose of 8 mg/kg for de novo participants who start Herceptin treatment in the study. For all other cycles where IV Herceptin is given and for non-de novo participants, the dose will be 6 mg/kg. The SC dose will be 600 mg for both the SID and vial formulations for all cycles where SC Herceptin is given.

Intervention Type DRUG

Single-Use Injection Device

The SID will be used, containing Herceptin 600 mg per 5 milliliters (mL).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single-Use Injection Device

The SID will be used, containing Herceptin 600 mg per 5 mL.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Trastuzumab Trastuzumab

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed HER2-positive primary breast cancer
* No evidence of residual, locally recurrent, or metastatic disease after completion of surgery and chemotherapy (neo-adjuvant or adjuvant)
* Completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to entry, if received
* At least 8 remaining cycles out of the total 18 planned 3-week cycles, if received IV Herceptin
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria

* History of other malignancy, except for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell carcinoma, or other curatively treated malignancies of which the participant has been disease-free for at least 5 years
* Inadequate bone marrow function
* Impaired liver function
* Inadequate renal function
* Serious cardiovascular disease
* Human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B or C infection
* Prior maximum cumulative dose of doxorubicin greater than (\>) 360 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m\^2) or epirubicin \>720 mg/m\^2 or equivalent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

La Tronche, , France

Site Status

LeMans, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint-Cloud, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Deggendorf, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Fürstenwalde, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Magedburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Meiningen, , Germany

Site Status

Recklinghausen, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Genoa, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Antella (FI), Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Terni, Umbria, Italy

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain

Site Status

Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain

Site Status

Huesca, Huesca, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Zamora, Zamora, Spain

Site Status

Eskilstuna, , Sweden

Site Status

Gävle, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Bornova, ?zm?r, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Gaziantep, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chelmsford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Maidstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Peterborough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Truro, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Denmark France Germany Italy Poland Russia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pivot X, Verma S, Fallowfield L, Muller V, Lichinitser M, Jenkins V, Sanchez Munoz A, Machackova Z, Osborne S, Gligorov J; PrefHer Study Group. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous trastuzumab and intravenous trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: Final analysis of the randomised, two-cohort PrefHer study. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28963915 (View on PubMed)

Gligorov J, Curigliano G, Muller V, Knoop A, Jenkins V, Verma S, Osborne S, Lauer S, Machackova Z, Fallowfield L, Pivot X. Switching between intravenous and subcutaneous trastuzumab: Safety results from the PrefHer trial. Breast. 2017 Aug;34:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28549309 (View on PubMed)

De Cock E, Pivot X, Hauser N, Verma S, Kritikou P, Millar D, Knoop A. A time and motion study of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2016 Mar;5(3):389-97. doi: 10.1002/cam4.573. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26806010 (View on PubMed)

Pivot X, Gligorov J, Muller V, Curigliano G, Knoop A, Verma S, Jenkins V, Scotto N, Osborne S, Fallowfield L; PrefHer Study Group. Patients' preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two-cohort PrefHer study. Ann Oncol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1979-1987. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu364. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25070545 (View on PubMed)

Pivot X, Gligorov J, Muller V, Barrett-Lee P, Verma S, Knoop A, Curigliano G, Semiglazov V, Lopez-Vivanco G, Jenkins V, Scotto N, Osborne S, Fallowfield L; PrefHer Study Group. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PrefHer): an open-label randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):962-70. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70383-8. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23965225 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-024099-25

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MO22982

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.