Trial Outcomes & Findings for Potential of Florbetapir F 18 PET to Inform Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Progressive Cognitive Decline (NCT NCT01400425)
NCT ID: NCT01400425
Last Updated: 2013-03-29
Results Overview
The impact of a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan on a physician's clinical diagnosis and management of a subject was evaluated on a hypothetical basis because at the start of this study Florbetapir F 18 was an investigational drug and the data collected is for research purposes only. The percentage of subjects who received a negative florbetapir scan that led to a change in hypothetical clinical diagnosis and physician management plans are presented below. A negative florbetapir PET scan is indicative of none to sparse β-amyloid neuritic plaque density according to the modified Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
239 participants
6 weeks
2013-03-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
239
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
229
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Potential of Florbetapir F 18 PET to Inform Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Progressive Cognitive Decline
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=229 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
205 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
74.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
229 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: 116 of 229 subjects with progressive cognitive decline received a negative florbetapir scan.
The impact of a negative florbetapir F 18 PET scan on a physician's clinical diagnosis and management of a subject was evaluated on a hypothetical basis because at the start of this study Florbetapir F 18 was an investigational drug and the data collected is for research purposes only. The percentage of subjects who received a negative florbetapir scan that led to a change in hypothetical clinical diagnosis and physician management plans are presented below. A negative florbetapir PET scan is indicative of none to sparse β-amyloid neuritic plaque density according to the modified Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=116 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Undergo a Hypothetical Change in Clinical Diagnosis and Physician Management Plan After Obtaining a Negative Florbetapir F 18 PET Scan.
Change in Clinical Diagnosis
|
56.9 Percentage of subjects
Interval 47.8 to 65.5
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Undergo a Hypothetical Change in Clinical Diagnosis and Physician Management Plan After Obtaining a Negative Florbetapir F 18 PET Scan.
Change in Physician Management Plan
|
81.9 Percentage of subjects
Interval 73.9 to 87.8
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: 113 out of 229 subjects with progressive cognitive decline received a positive florbetapir scan.
The impact of a positive florbetapir F 18 PET scan on a physician's clinical diagnosis and management of a subject was evaluated on a hypothetical basis because at the start of this study Florbetapir F 18 was an investigational drug and the data collected is for research purposes only. The percentage of subjects who received a positive florbetapir scan that led to a change in hypothetical clinical diagnosis and physician management plans are presented below. A positive florbetapir PET scan is indicative of moderate to frequent β-amyloid neuritic plaque density according to the modified Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=113 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Undergo a Hypothetical Change in Clinical Diagnosis and Physician Management Plan After Obtaining a Positive Florbetapir F 18 PET Scan
Change in Clinical Diagnosis
|
52.2 Percentage of subjects
Interval 43.1 to 61.2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Undergo a Hypothetical Change in Clinical Diagnosis and Physician Management Plan After Obtaining a Positive Florbetapir F 18 PET Scan
Change in Physician Management Plan
|
92.0 Percentage of subjects
Interval 85.6 to 95.8
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: The hypothetical clinical diagnosis remained unchanged in 62 of 229 subjects who received a florbetapir scan.
Change in confidence of the clinical diagnosis prior to obtaining a florbetapir F 18 PET scan to the confidence after obtaining a florbetapir F 18 PET scan among subjects in whom the clinical diagnosis remains unchanged. Confidence levels were self-determined by physicians based on their diagnostic certainty and ranged from 0-100%. The mean (SD) change in confidence reflects the average change in diagnostic confidence along the 0-100% scale for the 62 subjects analyzed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=62 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Confidence of the Clinical Diagnosis
|
23 Percent Change in Confidence
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: All subjects with progressive cognitive decline who have received a florbetapir scan.
Determine the percentage of subjects that had at least one hypothetical change between pre and post scan physician management plans. Change in management is defined as the number of subjects prescribed different item-wise plans at the two assessments divided by the total number of subjects in the population with both a pre and post florbetapir F 18 PET scan physician management plan.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=229 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Physician Management Plans
|
86.9 Percentage of subjects
Interval 81.9 to 90.7
|
—
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: The number of subjects analyzed for each reporting group is determined by scan status. There were 229 total subjects with progressive cognitive decline of whom 113 received a positive florbetapir scan and 116 received a negative florbetapir scan.
This outcome analyzed the percentage of subjects who had a hypothetical change in one of the medication or diagnostic categories listed below after receiving a florbetapir scan.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=229 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
n=113 Participants
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
n=116 Participants
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
AD Medication
|
31.0 Percentage of subjects
|
31.9 Percentage of subjects
|
30.2 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Psychiatric Medication
|
7.4 Percentage of subjects
|
3.5 Percentage of subjects
|
11.2 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Refer to Clinical Trial
|
16.2 Percentage of subjects
|
22.1 Percentage of subjects
|
10.3 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Brain Structural Imaging (CT/MRI)
|
14.0 Percentage of subjects
|
15.0 Percentage of subjects
|
12.9 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Lumbar Puncture
|
10.5 Percentage of subjects
|
8.8 Percentage of subjects
|
12.1 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Neuropsychologic Testing
|
22.7 Percentage of subjects
|
23.9 Percentage of subjects
|
21.6 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
FDG PET
|
10.0 Percentage of subjects
|
10.6 Percentage of subjects
|
9.5 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
ApoE Genotype
|
5.2 Percentage of subjects
|
5.3 Percentage of subjects
|
5.2 Percentage of subjects
|
|
Item Wise Changes in Physician Management Plan
Lab Test
|
7.9 Percentage of subjects
|
10.6 Percentage of subjects
|
5.2 Percentage of subjects
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Subjects who have received a florbetapir scan (either positive or negative).
The impact of a florbetapir F 18 PET scan on a physician's clinical diagnosis of a subject was evaluated on a hypothetical basis because at the start of this study Florbetapir F 18 was an investigational drug and the data collected is for research purposes only. The percentage of subjects who received a florbetapir scan that led to a change in hypothetical clinical diagnosis is presented below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=229 Participants
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
Subjectss With a Positive Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a positive florbetapir scan.
|
Subjects With a Negative Scan
Subjects with progressive cognitive decline that received a negative scan.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Who Undergo a Hypothetical Change in Clinical Diagnosis After Obtaining a Florbetapir F 18 PET Scan.
|
54.6 Percentage of subjects
Interval 48.1 to 60.9
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Subjects With Progressive Cognitive Decline
n=229 participants at risk
Subjects who have previously or are currently being evaluated for progressive cognitive decline. Enrolling physicians must have a confidence of less than 85% in their initial diagnosis of the subject's progressive cognitive decline and that there was at least a 15% chance that the subject's progressive cognitive decline was due to Alzheimer's disease. All subjects who did not complete the study withdrew before receiving a florbetapir F 18 injection and PET scan. Subjects received IV injection, 370 MBq (10 mCi) florbetapir F18, single dose.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.7%
4/229 • Number of events 4
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Crying
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.44%
1/229 • Number of events 1
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60