Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bystander Fatigue and CPR Quality Using Continuous Compressions Versus 30:2 Compressions to Ventilation (NCT NCT01397656)
NCT ID: NCT01397656
Last Updated: 2018-11-15
Results Overview
Count of compressions at a depth over 2 inches
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
63 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
5 minutes
Results posted on
2018-11-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CPR 30:2 Then CPR With Continuous Compressions
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations, then continuous chest compressions
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions Then CPR 30:2
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation then CPR using 30:2 ratio
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
33
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Bystander Fatigue and CPR Quality Using Continuous Compressions Versus 30:2 Compressions to Ventilation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CPR 30:2 Then CPR With Continuous Compressions
n=33 Participants
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions Then CPR 30:2
n=30 Participants
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
Total
n=63 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
|
69.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=7 Participants
|
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
CPR Training
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
CPR Experience
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 minutesCount of compressions at a depth over 2 inches
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CPR 30:2
n=62 Participants
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions
n=63 Participants
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
|---|---|---|
|
CPR Quality
|
324.9 Compressions
Standard Deviation 120
|
381.5 Compressions
Standard Deviation 68.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately before and after 5 minutes of CPROutcome measures
| Measure |
CPR 30:2
n=62 Participants
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions
n=63 Participants
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Rate
|
82.8 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
82.4 beats per minute
Standard Deviation 15.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately before and after 5 minutes of CPRMean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CPR 30:2
n=62 Participants
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions
n=63 Participants
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure
|
109.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.7
|
110.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately before and after 5 minutes of CPRThe Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale ranges from 6-20, where a score of 6 is associated with the least fatigue
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CPR 30:2
n=62 Participants
30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
|
CPR With Continuous Compressions
n=63 Participants
Continuous Chest Compressions without ventilation
Bystander CPR using 30:2 ratio versus continuous compression: Participants will use 2 CPR techniques, one with 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and the other with continuous compressions without ventilation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale
|
11.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
11.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
Adverse Events
CPR 30:2 Then CPR With Continuous Compressions
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
CPR With Continuous Compressions Then CPR 30:2
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Christian Vaillancourt
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Phone: 613-798-5555
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place