A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Larazotide Acetate for the Treatment of Celiac Disease

NCT ID: NCT01396213

Last Updated: 2017-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

342 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-07

Study Completion Date

2013-08-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2B study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Larazotide Acetate in the treatment of patients with celiac disease who have persistent symptoms despite being on a gluten-free diet.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2B study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three different doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg TID) of Larazotide Acetate as an adjunct to gluten-free diet in the treatment of patients with celiac disease (CD). The diagnosis of CD must have been established by jejunal biopsy as well as serology at some point in time prior to entry into the study. Patients must have symptoms despite being on a gluten-free diet as defined by a celiac disease domain of the gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale equal to or more than 2.0.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Celiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
double-blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Larazotide Acetate 0.5 mg

larazotide acetate 0.5 mg capsules TID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Larazotide Acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Larazotide Acetate 1 mg

larazotide acetate 1 mg capsules TID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Larazotide Acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Larazotide Acetate 2 mg

larazotide acetate 2 mg capsules TID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Larazotide Acetate

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Placebo

placebo capsules TID

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

gelatin capsule

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Larazotide Acetate

gelatin capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

gelatin capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AT-1001 INN-202

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female adults with biopsy proven and serology-confirmed celiac disease on a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months
* measurable serology at screening
* CeD GSRS score of ≥ 2.0 prior to randomization
* experiencing symptoms (ie, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, or stomachache)
* willing to maintain current diet gluten-free diet throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* refractory celiac disease or severe complications of celiac disease (eg, EATL, ulcerative jejunitis, perforation, etc.)
* chronic active GI disease other than celiac disease
* diabetes (Type 1 or 2) or other autoimmune disease that might interfere with the conduct of the study
* hemoglobin value \< 8.5 g/dL
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henrik Rasmussen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sponsor GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Summerfield, Florida, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Wyoming, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Marlton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mentor, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Perkasie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

St. George, Utah, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leffler DA, Kelly CP, Green PH, Fedorak RN, DiMarino A, Perrow W, Rasmussen H, Wang C, Bercik P, Bachir NM, Murray JA. Larazotide acetate for persistent symptoms of celiac disease despite a gluten-free diet: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jun;148(7):1311-9.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25683116 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Clin1001-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id