Daily Checklists and Outcome in the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT01396044

Last Updated: 2012-12-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

451 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medical errors account for tens of thousands of deaths and tens of billions of dollars in healthcare costs in the United States every year. One field that has seen the strongest push toward quality improvement has been critical care medicine, likely because its particularly high degree of medical complexity makes it a practice area prone to high error rates with serious consequences. One of the most commonly used interventions used to help reduce errors in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been the implementation of checklists.

The investigators propose a clinical trial in a University critical care setting to determine whether an electronic checklist versus verbal prompting to use a written checklist improves clinical practice and patient outcomes. The investigators also plan to compare these data with a time period prior to the study to determine if the electronic checklist or verbal prompting are better than usual care. The investigators hypothesize that both the electronic checklist and verbal prompting to use a written checklist will be better for clinical practice and patient outcomes than usual care, and that verbal prompting will lead to better outcomes compared to the electronic checklist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Quality improvement Checklist Critical care Anti-bacterial agents Mechanical ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electronic checklist

Electronic checklist

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electronic checklist

Intervention Type OTHER

Electronic checklist for process of care issues implemented in our institution. Training on a regular basis of the electronic checklist arm to use the electronic checklist. Process of care issues on the electronic checklist include several that are under investigation: antibiotics and mechanical ventilation.

Verbal prompting

Verbal prompting with written checklist

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Verbal prompting

Intervention Type OTHER

Prompting by study investigators of physicians on the verbal prompting arm. Prompting will include questions related to antibiotic utilization and mechanical ventilation weaning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electronic checklist

Electronic checklist for process of care issues implemented in our institution. Training on a regular basis of the electronic checklist arm to use the electronic checklist. Process of care issues on the electronic checklist include several that are under investigation: antibiotics and mechanical ventilation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Verbal prompting

Prompting by study investigators of physicians on the verbal prompting arm. Prompting will include questions related to antibiotic utilization and mechanical ventilation weaning.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Admission to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) team during the study timeframe

Exclusion Criteria

* Transfer from MICU team to a separate ICU team within 12 hours of admission
* Transfer to MICU team from a separate ICU team after more than 72 hours on the separate ICU team
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parker B. Francis Fellowship Program

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Curtis Weiss

Instructor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Curtis H Weiss, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Weiss CH, Moazed F, McEvoy CA, Singer BD, Szleifer I, Amaral LA, Kwasny M, Watts CM, Persell SD, Baker DW, Sznajder JI, Wunderink RG. Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep 15;184(6):680-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201101-0037OC. Epub 2011 May 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21616996 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NUIRBSTU00013313

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id